Tuesday 16 October 2012

10 Money Mistakes That Can Ruin a Marriage


By Renee Morad
Fri, Oct 12, 2012


As anyone who’s been there knows, there’s no such thing as a friction-free marriage. But arguing can be ominous when the topic is money.
Couples who reported disagreeing about finances once a week were 30 percent more likely to get divorced than couples who reported disagreeing about them once a month, according to a Utah State University study.
In another survey, published in the Forum for Family and Consumer Issues, finances proved to be the leading cause of conflict in marriage, with 39 percent of respondents listing it as their primary issue and 54 percent as their secondary issue.
Here are 10 of the most common mistakes couples make when dealing with money.

1. Not talking enough about finances
There’s a time and place for everything, but it’s often difficult to find the right time and place to talk money.
Some couples benefit from scheduling a time to talk about money matters, just like they would for a date night or business meeting. Other couples might choose to set a monetary limit that would initiate a conversation: Let’s say, for example, they decide purchases under $500 are discretionary but spending money over that amount warrants a discussion.
Find what works for you and your spouse and commit to it. It might not be the most enjoyable way to spend time together, but you’ll thank yourselves later.

2. Thinking you can buy love
If you think splurging on a new diamond ring or luxury car will help improve your marriage, think again.
A Brigham Young University study found couples with two materialistic spouses were worse off on nearly every measure. Following behind were couples with one materialistic spouse.
Couples who claimed money was not important to them, however, were lucky in love: They scored 10 to 15 percent better on marriage stability and other measures of relationship quality than couples with one or two materialistic spouses.
Interestingly, it didn’t matter how much money they had, but how much value they put on money. In the study, couples who were better off financially but admitted to having “a strong love of money” found that money was a bigger source of conflict.

3. Ignoring conflicting spending habits
Scholars have found that individuals gravitate toward spouses who look, sound, and act as they do – except when it comes to money, according to surveys conducted by the University of Pennsylvania, University of Michigan, and Northwestern University.
Penny pinchers and reckless spenders tend to marry the other, but these couples report unhappier marriages than those in which both spouses had similar spending habits, the studies revealed.
Disparity in spending can be manageable, but if issues aren’t addressed, research says this could increase your likelihood of divorce. The Utah State University study found individuals who feel their spouse spends money foolishly reported lower levels of marital happiness and gauged their likelihood of divorce at 45 percent.

4. Not agreeing on how to divide money
Whether you have joint or separate accounts – or both – doesn’t really matter. What does is whether your financial plan is the right one for your marriage.
This comes down to you and your spouse’s spending habits and money values. If you’re unnecessarily stressing about small, day-to-day purchases, for example, it might be better to put part of your finances in separate accounts – so you’re less likely to question your spouse’s every buy. If you work better as a team knowing where all your money is and where it’s going at all times, then merged accounts could be better.

5. Taking on too much debt
About 76 percent of Americans admit money is a significant source of stress in their lives, according to an American Psychological Association report.
There’s nothing more stressful about money than debt – especially the high-interest, hard-to-pay-off kind. If there’s debt hanging overhead that’s threatening to come between you, read stories like A Simple System to Destroy Debt and focus on paying it off – together.

6. Hiding purchases or debts
Eighty percent of married couples hide some purchases from their spouse, according to a survey by nonprofit CESI Debt Solutions – with men admitting they’re more likely to routinely cover up their spending.
The survey revealed 30 percent of respondents view financial infidelity as being just as harmful as sexual infidelity. What’s more, 79 percent of married respondents were more likely to confess about their financial infidelity to a friend than their spouse.

7. Lending or borrowing money from family
In our recent story The 7 Dumbest Ways to Borrow Money, we explained that borrowing money from family comes with major strings attached. After all, you’re risking your relationship if the deal goes bad.
These waters are even more treacherous for married couples. Rule of thumb: Whether it’s borrowing or lending, the fewer in-laws involved, the better.
Of course, with the right scenarios, borrowing money from or lending it to family can be a success. But proceed with caution: Consider drafting a legal document to ensure everyone’s on the same page, and resist splurging on luxury items while you still owe family members money.

8. Believing you need to split up financial responsibilities traditionally
Traditional roles suggest that women manage the day-to-day finances, like balancing the checkbook and paying the utility bills, and men typically handle investing and financial planning. But traditional isn’t always best.
A better option: Recognize each other’s individual strengths and divvy up the financial tasks accordingly. You want the best candidate for the job, regardless of what other couples do or used to do.

9. Failing to recognize that money matters carry emotional weight
Compared with disagreements over any other topic, research shows financial disagreements last longer, are more salient to couples, and generate more negative conflict tactics, such as yelling.
Money conflicts in marriage particularly affect men. Research suggests that since they are socialized to be providers, men tend to take financial conflict harder than women.

10. Not enjoying your money together
Money doesn’t always have to be a source of stress or conflict. It can also be a source of pleasure. Some of my happiest memories with my husband wouldn’t have been possible without us spending money – on things like exploring Italy, or taking our daughter on her first trip to Florida.
In fact, research indicates that spending money on new experiences, like concert tickets or a wine tasting, produces longer-lasting satisfaction than spending money on material possessions. Experiences bring us happiness not only when we’re experiencing them, but also whenever we reflect back on them as memories.
Fond memories, after all, usually turn out to be one of the most valuable assets in a marriage.


How do you value this company OPQ?

I have been looking at this company.  Its business is doing very well.  It has grown its revenues, profit before tax and earnings consistently over many  years.  Its business is growing due to its excellent products and marketing.

Its PBT margin and net profit margins have grown over the years from single digits to double digits.  It latest PBT margin and net profit margins were 17.4% and 13% respectively.  Its ROE is consistently above 30% for many quarters and the last few years.  It DPO ratio averages 70%.

Its latest trailing-twelve months earnings was $110 million and its market capitalisation recently was $ 3200 million.  It is projected that it will probably deliver $130 million in this financial year with a high degree of predictability.

(A)  Calculating the value of this company today.
How would you value the earnings and dividends of this company?

Using the thinking similar to that of Buffett:

1.  The risk free interest rate offered by the banks is 4% per year.
2.  How much deposit would you need to put in the bank to earn $110 million per year?
3.  Answer:  $110 million / 4% = $2750 million.
4.  This company pays out 70%+ of its earnings as dividends, i.e. about $77 million.
5.  How much deposit would you need to put in the bank to earn $77 million at present prevailing interest rate of 4% per year?
6.  Answer:  $77 million / 4% = $1925 million.
7.  A fixed deposit gives you a fixed interest rate of the same amount every year, assuming that the interest rate paid remains unchanged.
8.  On the other hand, this company's earnings are expected to grow quite fast in the coming years.
9.  Assuming that this company can grow its earnings at 2% per year for the next few years, with a high degree of predictability, how would you value this company?
10.  Let's continue with the analogy above.
11.  With its earnings of $ 110 million, growing at 2% per year, you will need to have a fixed deposit of the equivalent of $ 110 million / (4% - 2%) = $ 5500 million.
12.  With its dividend of $ 77 million, growing at 2% per year, you will similarly have to have a fixed deposit of the equivalent of $ 77 million / (4% - 2%) = $ 3850 million.


To summarise:

Assuming no growth in its earnings or dividends, and using 4% risk free interest rate as the discount factor, the present values of
- the earnings stream is the equivalent to an asset of $ 2750 million.
- the dividends stream is the equivalent to an asset of $1925 million.

When growth is factored into the earnings and dividends stream, even at a low rate of growth of 2% and still using the 4% risk free interest rate as the discount factor, the present values of:
- the earnings stream is $ 5500 million.
- the dividends stream is $ 3850 million.

This company's market capitalization was $ 3200 million recently.  Assuming no growth in the earnings of this company, the value of this company is anywhere between $1925 million (this price is supported by its dividend yield) and $ 2750 million (supported by its earning yield).

At $ 3200 million, its reward:risk ratio is against the investor as the current price of this company is higher than your calculated intrinsic value of $ 2750 million.


(B)  Calculating the value of this company at the end of this financial year, using (projected earnings and dividends).
However, it is projected that this company will deliver $ 130 million in earnings and at DPO of 70%, $91 million in dividends.

Let's recalculate the values you will place on these earnings stream and dividend streams.

How would you value the earnings and dividends of this company?

Using the thinking similar to that of Buffett:

1.  The risk free interest rate offered by the banks is 4% per year.
2.  How much deposit would you need to put in the bank to earn $130 million per year?
3.  Answer:  $130 million / 4% = $ 3250 million.
4.  This company pays out 70%+ of its earnings as dividends, i.e. about $91 million.
5.  How much deposit would you need to put in the bank to earn $91 million at present prevailing interest rate of 4% per year?
6.  Answer:  $91 million / 4% = $ 2275 million.
7.  A fixed deposit gives you a fixed interest rate of the same amount every year, assuming that the interest rate paid remains unchanged.
8.  On the other hand, this company's earnings are expected to grow quite fast in the coming years.
9.  Assuming that this company can grow its earnings at 2% per year for the next few years, with a high degree of predictability, how would you value this company?
10.  Let's continue with the analogy above.
11.  With its earnings of $ 130 million, growing at 2% per year, you will need to have a fixed deposit of the equivalent of $ 130 million / (4% - 2%) = $ 6500 million.
12.  With its dividend of $ 91million, growing at 2% per year, you will similarly have to have a fixed deposit of the equivalent of $ 91 million / (4% - 2%) = $ 4550 million.


To summarise:

Assuming no growth in its earnings or dividends, and using 4% risk free interest rate as the discount factor, the present values of
- the earnings stream is the equivalent to an asset of $ 3250 million.
- the dividends stream is the equivalent to an asset of $ 2275 million.

When growth is factored into the earnings and dividends stream, even at a low rate of growth of 2% and still using the 4% risk free interest rate as the discount factor, the present values of:
- the earnings stream is $ 6500 million.
- the dividends stream is $ 4550 million.

This company's market capitalization was $ 3200 million recently.  Assuming no growth in the earnings of this company, the value of this company is anywhere between $ 3250 million (this price is supported by its dividend yield) and $ 2275 million (supported by its earning yield), at the end of its financial year..

At $ 3200 million, it is priced close to the calculated intrinsic value for the company in the end of its financial year of $ 3250 million.  There is little margin of safety as demanded by Benjamin Graham in his teaching.  The upside reward = 50 million and the downside risk = 925 million, that is, a reward;risk ratio = 1 : 18.5.

But what if you also factored in the strong growth of this company?  What would be its intrinsic value?


Conclusion:

Since, this company is projected to grow its earnings with a high degree of predictability in the future, will you buy this company at its current price of $ 3200 million?

Those with a short term perspective in their "investing" will realise that the current price has priced in the growth expected for this financial year. 

However, for those with a longer term perspective in their investing, for example 5 years, they will realise that the earnings of this company will continue to grow consistently and predictably.  Considering the earnings growth potential, and including this factor into their calculation of intrinsic value, they may rightly be of the opinion that this company is indeed undervalued.  


Monday 15 October 2012

How do you value this company XYZ?

I have been looking at this company.  Its business is doing very well.  It has grown its revenues, profit before tax and earnings consistently over the last few years.  Its business is growing and it is opening new branches in various towns/cities in our country.

Its net profit margins are high (>20%), its ROE is high (> 25%) and it pays about 30%+ of its earnings as dividends.

Its trailing-twelve months earnings was $113.1 million and its market capitalisation recently was $1642 million.


How would you value the earnings and dividends of this company?

Using the thinking similar to that of Buffett:

1.  The risk free interest rate offered by the banks is 4% per year.
2.  How much deposit would you need to put in the bank to earn $113.1 million per year?
3.  Answer:  $113.1 million / 4% = $2827.5 million.
4.  This company pays out 30%+ of its earnings as dividends, i.e. about $40 million.
5.  How much deposit would you need to put in the bank to earn $40 million at present prevailing interest rate of 4% per year?
6.  Answer:  $40 million / 4% = $1000 million.
7.  A fixed deposit gives you a fixed interest rate of the same amount every year, assuming that the interest rate paid remains unchanged.
8.  On the other hand, this company's earnings are expected to grow quite fast in the coming years.
9.  Assuming that this company can grow its earnings at a very low 2% per year for the next few years, with a high degree of predictability, how would you value this company?
10.  Let's continue with the analogy above.
11.  With its earnings of $ 113.1 million, growing at 2% per year, you will need to have a fixed deposit of the equivalent of $ 113.1 million / (4% - 2%) = $ 5655 million.
12.  With its dividend of $ 40 million, growing at 2% per year, you will similarly have to have a fixed deposit of the equivalent of $ 40 million / (4% - 2%) = $ 2000 million.


To summarise:

Assuming no growth in its earnings or dividends, and using 4% risk free interest rate as the discount factor, the present values of
- the earnings stream is the equivalent to an asset of $ 2827.5 million.
- the dividends stream is the equivalent to an asset of $1000 million.

When growth is factored into the earnings and dividends stream, even at a low rate of growth of 2% and still using the 4% risk free interest rate as the discount factor, the present values of:
- the earnings stream is $ 5655 million.
- the dividends stream is $ 2000 million.

This company's market capitalization was $ 1642 million recently.  Assuming no growth in the earnings of this company, the value of this company is anywhere between $1000 million (this price is supported by its dividend yield) and $2827.5 million (supported by its earning yield).

At $ 1642 million, its reward:risk ratio = 64.9%: 35.1%.


Conclusion:

Since, this company is projected to grow its earnings with a high degree of predictability, at its present price of $ 1642 million, those who are buying into this company at the present price, enjoy a large margin of safety.




How to Determine the VALUE? Illustrated by Buffett's investment in GEICO.

GEICO

1976

When Buffett started buying GEICO, the company was close to bankruptcy.

But he says GEICO was worth a substantial sum, even with a negative net worth, because of the company's insurance franchise.

In 1976, the company had no earnings, and this defied a mathematical determination of value as put forth by John Burr Williams.

Williams postulated that the value of a business is determined by the net cash flows expected to occur over the life of a business discounted at an appropriate rate.  

Despite the uncertainty over GEICO's future cash flows, Buffett was sure that the company would survive and earn money in the future.  

How and when was open to speculation.


1980

In 1980, Berkshire Hathaway owned one-third of GEICO, invested at a cost of $47 million.   That year, GEICO's total market value was $296 million.  

Even then, Buffett estimated that the company possessed a significant margin of safety.

In 1980, the company earned $60 million on $705 million in revenues.  Berkshire's share of GEICO's earnings was $20 million.

According to Buffett, "to buy a similar $20 million in earnings in a business with first class economic characteristics, and bright prospects would cost a minimum of $200 million" - more if the purchase was for a controlling interest in a company.


Let's look at Buffett's $200 million assumption.  Is it realistic, given the theory by Williams?

Assuming that GEICO could sustain this $60 million in earnings without the aid of any additional capital, the present value of GEICO, discounted at the then-current 12% rate for a thirty-year U.S. government bond, would have been $500 million - almost twice GEICO''s 1980 market value.

PV (no growth)
= $60 / 12% 
= $500 million.

IF the company could grow this earnings power at 2% real, or at 15% before current inflation, the present value of GEICO would increase to $600 million, and Berkshire's share would equal $200 million.  

PV (2% earnings growth rate)
= $60 million / (12%-2%) 
=  $60 million / 10% 
= $ 600 million.


Conclusion

In other word, in 1980, the market value of GEICO's stock was less than half the discounted present value of its earnings power.

Sunday 14 October 2012

My First Post in this Blog was on 1.8.2008 on the Investment Policies based on Benjamin Graham's teachings.

I started my blog on 1.8.2008 and my first post was:

Investment Policies (Based on Benjamin Graham)
Summary of Investment Policies
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2008/08/investment-policies-based-on-benjamin.html

It was highly educational to blog during that period at the start of the global financial crisis.  There were so much uncertainties.  

However, when you have a philosophy and strategy to guide your investing that is sound and safe, it was a great time to see if this can withstand the onslaught of a severe bear market.  Actually, you should not fear the bear market.  You should fear the bull market instead.

In June 12, 2009, when the market had turned, I reviewed my investing for the previous 12 months.  Here are my lessons learned from the recent severe bear market.
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/06/lessons-from-recent-severe-bear-market.html

Here are 2 articles to guide investing in the different phases of the stock market.
What to Do in a Up (Bull) Market?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-to-do-in-up-bull-market.html

What to Do in a Down (Bear) Market?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-to-do-in-bear-market.html

Saturday 13 October 2012

Hong Leong Bank Berhad (28.8.2012)


Date announced 28-Aug-2012
Quarter 30/6/2012
Qtr 4
FYE 30/6/2012
STOCK HLBank
C0DE  5819 

Price $ 13.68
Curr. PE (ttm-Eps) 13.7
Curr. DY 2.78%


Dividends % chg
Curr. FY0 38.00 90.0%
Prev FY1 20.00 0.0%
Prev FY2 20.00
Curr. DY  2.78%
Risk vs Returns
Upside 2.58 72%
Downside 1.00 28%
Returns
One Yr Apprec Pot.  15%
Avg Yield  6%
Avg Tot. Ann Return 21%
(for next 5 years)
INPUT VARIABLES
Today's Share Pr $ 13.68
EPS GR % 15%
Avg H. PE 12.0
Avg. L. PE 10.0
Rec. Severe Low Pr 9.64
Current PE 13.71
Signature PE 11.00
RV 125%
Rational Price 10.98
Dividends
Present Dividend 38.00
Avg % DPO 38%
Present Div Yield 2.78%
Present High Yield 3.94%
EPS G. RATE 15%
Present Market Pr. 13.68


Stock Performance Chart for Hong Leong Bank Berhad

Should I Buy Tesco?

Should I Buy Tesco?

By Harvey Jones
October 8, 2012

LONDON -- It's time to go shopping for shares again, but where to start? Mining giant Rio Tinto? High-yielding insurer RSA Insurance Group? Or renowned U.K. engineer Rolls-Royce?
There are plenty of great stocks to choose from, and I'm enjoying doing some window shopping. So, here's the question I'm asking right now. Should I buy Tesco (LSE:TSCO.L  ) ?
The big drop
Gosh, hasn't Tesco been a disappointment lately? A couple of years ago, this growth-hungry retail giant had gobbled up most of the U.K. high street and was sizing up the rest of the planet. It looked unstoppable.
But the world turned, and Tesco fell out of favor. U.K. shoppers bridled at its charmless big-box stores. The supermarket's 500 million pound Big Price Drop campaign famously flopped. Sales fell for the first time since 1994.
In January, the unthinkable happened. Tesco's share price suffered its own Big Price Drop, plunging nearly 25% to from 4.11 pounds to just 3.12 pounds in a matter of days, wiping 5 billion pounds off its market value
Just as shockingly, it has scarcely recovered since. You can now buy Tesco for 3.18 pounds. Does that make it a bargain?
A little help needed
It's a good time to find out, because Tesco has just posted its results for the half year to Aug. 26. And it's looking a bit shop-soiled, reporting a 12.4% fall in U.K. trading profits to 1.12 billion pounds, although it did return like-for-like sales growth for the first time in seven quarters, thanks to the success of its rebranded Everyday Value range. It was only a quarterly rise of 0.1% but, as they say, "every little helps."
Tesco also reported 11% growth in online U.K. sales, while chief executive Philip Clarke defended the profits drop by saying it had spent big this year, taking on 8,000 new staff and investing 1 billion pounds in its stores, in a bid to boost the customer experience.
Mr. Clarke also blamed the disappointing performance on rising fuel prices, tax hikes, and slowing incomes, all of which have hit Tesco customers hard.
Mind you, they have also hit shoppers at Sainsbury's, but sales growth has been stronger.

Think small
Investors who bought right after the big Tesco share price drop in January in the hope of making a quick profit will have to hunker down for a lengthy wait.
After years of sweeping all before it, Tesco has some adapting to do. It now plans to investmore in its online offerings, and slow its aggressive campaign to slap a new giant store on the edge of every U.K. city, town and village. Smaller stores are the future, it believes.
Tesco isn't just struggling in the U.K. International profits fell 17% to 378 million pounds, because of the slowing Chinese economy and eurozone austerity, where sales dropped nearly 7%.
This isn't an easy time to invest in retailers. Then again, the share price slump has left Tesco trading on a juicy yield of 4.5%, with a forecast price-to-earnings ratio of 9.8 for February 2013.
I like to buy big companies on bad news. Although I expect Tesco to struggle for a little longer, I wouldn't bet against it in the longer run. Over a five-year time frame, I'm tempted to gamble on its recovery.

A Quick Review of Tesco's Results

A Quick Review of Tesco's Results

By G. A. Chester
October 3, 2012 |

LONDON -- Last week, in a preview of Tesco's (LSE: TSCO.L  ) half-year results, I told you about some of the key numbers to look out for.
The U.K.'s biggest supermarket announced its results this morning, so let's have a quick look at how it did in the first half -- and whether it's on track to meet analysts' forecasts for the full year. The forecasts are the analysts' consensus ahead of the results.

H1 2012/13
H1 Growth
Forecast FY 2012/13
Forecast FY Growth
Revenue*
32.3 billion pounds
1.6%
67.2 billion pounds
3.1%
Trading profit
1.6 billion pounds
(10.5%)
3.6 billion pounds
(3.0%)
Trading margin
4.9%
5.4%
Underlying profit before tax
1.8 billion pounds
(8.5%)
3.8 billion pounds
(4.0%)
Underlyingearnings per share (diluted)
17.08 pence
(7.9%)
35.1 pence
(6.3%)
4.63 pence
0%
14.83 pence
0.5%
*Excluding VAT, including petrol.
Overall, the H1 growth percentages are below the rate analysts are expecting for the full year, so a much stronger H2 is baked into the full-year forecast numbers.
It should be relatively easy for Tesco to beat last year's H2 because performance was weak during that period and included an unusually poor Christmas. Nevertheless, the company has something to do after today's H1 numbers if it's to meet analysts' full-year forecasts. I wouldn't be surprised to see those forecasts edging down a bit now.
In the U.K., like-for-like sales (excluding VAT and petrol) -- the key indicator of how management action to turn around the core home supermarket business is going -- were broadly in line with the expectations of the house brokers: namely, a Q2 rise of 0.1%, following Q1's -1.5%.
Internationally, Tesco's U.S. Fresh & Easy business continues to be loss-making at the same 70-odd million pound level as last year's H1. The company has to improve here in H2 to meet the chief executive's prediction earlier this year of a "significant" reduction in losses during the current year.
In the recent past, Tesco has relied on Asia and Europe as the powerhouses for group growth. However, a hefty fall in H1 profits in these regions now leaves the company facing difficulties on many fronts.
Finally, Tesco maintained its interim dividend at the same level as last year -- the first time it's failed to increase the dividend in I don't know how long.
Tesco remains one of the most popular shares with U.K. small investors. It's also a favorite of legendary U.S. billionaire investor Warren Buffett. In fact, Buffett bought a trolley-load of Tesco shares earlier this year.
You can find out the price the Sage of Omaha was willing to pay for his shares by downloading an exclusive Motley Fool report: “The One U.K. Share Warren Buffett Loves.”



Friday 12 October 2012

QL Resources Bhd (23.8.2012)


Date announced 23-Aug-2012
Quarter 30/6/2012
Qtr 1
FYE  31/3/2013
STOCK QL
C0DE  7084

Price $ 3.3
Curr. PE (ttm-Eps) 20.22
Curr. DY 1.36%


Dividends % chg
Curr. FY0 4.50 5.9%
Prev FY1 4.25 36.0%
Prev FY2 3.13
Curr. DY  1.36%
Risk vs Returns
Upside 3.96 80%
Downside 1.00 20%
Returns
One Yr Apprec Pot.  10%
Avg Yield  3%
Avg Tot. Ann Return 13%
(for next 5 years)
INPUT VARIABLES
Today's Share Pr $ 3.30
EPS GR % 15%
Avg H. PE 15.0
Avg. L. PE 12.0
Rec. Severe Low Pr 2.89
Current PE 20.22
Signature PE 13.50
RV 150%
Rational Price 2.20
Dividends
Present Dividend 4.50
Avg % DPO 28%
Present Div Yield 1.36%
Present High Yield 1.56%
EPS G. RATE 15%
Present Market Pr. 3.30


Stock Performance Chart for QL Resources Bhd






Parkson (27.8.2012)


Date announced 27-Aug-2012
Quarter 30/6/2012
Qtr 4 FYE 30/6/2012
STOCK Parkson
C0DE  5657 

Price $ 4.7
Curr. ttm-PE 13.60
Curr. DY 3.40%


Dividends   % chg
Curr. FY0 16.00 6.7%
Prev FY1 15.00 150.0%
Prev FY2 6.00  
Curr. DY  3.40%  
     
     
Risk vs Returns  
Upside 1.54 61%
Downside 1.00 39%
     
Returns    
One Yr Apprec Pot.  7%
Avg Yield    5%
Avg Tot. Ann Return 12%
(for next 5 years)  
     
INPUT VARIABLES  
Today's Share Pr $ 4.70
EPS GR %   7%
Avg H. PE   13.0
Avg. L. PE   10.0
Rec. Severe Low Pr 3.66
     
Current PE   13.60
Signature PE 11.50
RV   118%
Rational Price   3.97
     
     
Dividends    
Present Dividend 16.00
Avg % DPO   46%
     
Present Div Yield 3.40%
Present High Yield 4.37%
     
EPS G. RATE 7%
Present Market Pr. 4.70


Stock Performance Chart for Parkson Holdings Berhad

Announcements:

Changes in Sub. S-hldr's Int. (29B) - GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE INVESTMENT CORPORATION PTE LTD
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1083497
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1078729
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1073833
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1073829
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1049041
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1041285
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1036345
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1032121
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1028561
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/972149
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/920680



Share buybacks
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1073841
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1063793
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1062541
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1050681
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1000077


Changes in Director's Interest (S135) - TAN SRI CHENG HENG JEM
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/928793
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/921269






http://biz.thestar.com.my/marketwatch/charts/chartlist.asp?charttype=17&days=365&submit1=submit&stock_code=5657%2CPARKSON&p1=4.72&p2=4.71&p3=4.78&p4=4.71&p5=4.75&p6=0.03&p7=0.64&p8=14054&p9=17.44&comurl=