Sunday 25 July 2010

The 1929 & 2007 Bear Market Race to The Bottom

19 February 2010






We can always learn something from studying the past, but past performance is no guarantee of what is to come.

Well during Bull Market, there are bad weeks, and in Bear Markets there are good weeks.

http://www.gold-speculator.com/mark-lundeen/22558-bear-market-race-week-123-djia-market-volume-dividend-payout-yield-considerations.html

Total Stock Returns = Fundamental Return + Speculative Return

Over long periods of time, if you take the entire stock market, you would expect the speculative return to be very negligible. This makes a lot of sense, right? In the end, you’ve got to show me the money! And history agrees. Over the last 100 years, the total annualized return for the total U.S. market was 9.6%, and all but 0.1% of that was explained by earning growth and dividends. (See graph below.)





Fundamental Return = Earnings Growth + Dividend Yield

Speculative Return = P/E Ratio Changes


Total Return = Fundamental Return + Speculative Return


What are we buying when we buy a share of a company? Essentially, we are buying a stream of future money. That money is returned to us the form of earnings growth (which increases the share price) and dividends (which goes straight to us as cash).


http://www.mymoneyblog.com/will-future-long-term-stock-returns-be-less-than-8.html

The Little Book of Common Sense Investing by Vanguard founder Jack Bogle

Double Your Dividends by Investing in Foreign Companies





http://www.globaldividends.com/newsletter.asp?d=2010



http://www.investmentadvisor.com/Issues/2007/August%202007/Pages/The-Income-Barista.aspx




http://www.zimbio.com/Stock+Portfolio+Investing/articles/554/Three+useful+dividend+growth+reinvestment

Australian companies usually have high dividend payout ratios and dividend yields.

Australia-Companies-Dividend-Yield

http://topforeignstocks.com/2009/08/24/top-10-banks-of-australia-by-assets-deposits/

10 by 10: A New Way to Look at Yield and Dividend Growth

Dividend investors often set minimum requirements for an “acceptable” initial dividend yield and/or dividend growth rate when they are considering buying a dividend stock.

Thus one investor might say, “I won’t invest in a dividend stock with a starting yield less than 3%.” Another might say, “I want a minimum 10% per year dividend increase.”

The goal, of course, is to purchase stocks whose yields and dividend growth rates are high enough to make them better bets than safer fixed-income investments like money market accounts, certificates of deposit, and bonds.

The dynamic that determines the goal of “high enough” is how a stock’s initial dividend yield and annual dividend growth rates interact over time. Obviously, a 6% initial yield will require a lower annual growth rate than a 2% initial yield to achieve a given return within a given time. By the same token, a 6% initial yield will get to a given return faster than a 2% initial yield for any given rate of growth.

Most dividend investors have a long-term holding period in mind when they buy dividend stocks. They are not looking to trade them often, but rather to hold them, allowing time for the dividends to increase and compound, until the stock itself becomes a money-generating machine irrespective of the stock’s price fluctuations.

Here is a useful way to look at this: Look for stocks that will achieve a 10% dividend return on your original investment within 10 years’ time. I call this the “10 by 10” approach.

The two 10’s are arbitrary, of course. You can put in any goals you like. I chose 10 and 10 because:
10% is a healthy rate of return, almost equal to the long-term total return of the stock market itself, which most studies show is between 10% and 11%. (Total return includes price appreciation as well as dividend return.)

10 years is a useful time frame for people of most ages. Young people, of course, have a much longer investment timeframe, but nevertheless may consider 10 years long enough to wait for the kind of return they are seeking. Older people—say in their 60’s and 70’s—still often think in terms of timeframes at least as long as 10 years, since just by having lived to their current age, their life expectancy usually is longer than 10 years from right now.

And, of course, 10 is a nice round number. It is easy to think in terms of 10% return and a 10-year timeframe to get a good grasp of the underlying principles.

So the question becomes simple: What initial yields, compounded at what rates of growth, achieve 10% return within 10 years?

The following table answers that question. It shows initial yields (across the top) and annual growth rates (down the side). Where any two values intersect, the table shows how many years it takes to achieve a 10% dividend return. Beneath the table are a few notes on calculation and interpretation.



The faster you hit your 10% dividend return rate goal, the fewer years that your stock choice is subject to prediction risk—that is, the risk that you overestimated its rate of dividend growth. As all dividend investors know, their initial rate of return is fixed at the time of purchase, but the future rate of dividend growth is somewhat speculative. Also, the higher the rate of projected dividend growth, the lower the probability that it will actually be achieved. Getting to your goal in fewer years is generally better all around.


http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/11/10-by-10-new-way-to-look-at-yield-and.html

Global High Dividend Stocks Have Outperformed the Markets

Dow Dividend Yield



The list is ranked based on dividend yield as of Dec. 31, 2009. As you can see, the dividend yield varies from an attractive 5.9% to 0%.

Here's a bar chart showing the dividend yield of the Top 15:

How to Create a Stream of Lasting Dividend Income

Future Dividends Growing at Varying Growth Rates 
(Graphic)





How to Create a Stream of Lasting Dividend Income
Thanks to the power of reinvested dividends and dividend growth.


Retention Rate Is Important Factor For Dividend Growth Companies

Investing in a company that simply increases it dividend will not ensure an investor that the investment will yield higher returns. One factor to evaluate is the earnings retention rate. Retention rate is the amount of earnings left over after accounting for the dividends paid to shareholders. If a company pays all earnings to shareholders, then the earnings retention would be zero. If a company pays out 70% of its earnings to shareholders, then the company's retention rate would equal 30%.

The table below shows the average retention and dividend growth rates over the past ten and five years for a number of companies we have recommended. As can be seen, since 1999 these companies, as a group, had an average retention rate of 17%, or more than four times the average of the S&P 500 for the same period. Their average dividend growth rates for the past five years were also far superior to the S&P 500 -- even taking into account the three companies in the group not paying dividends for the entire period.



http://disciplinedinvesting.blogspot.com/2009/05/retention-rate-is-important-factor-for.html

The power of compounding from Reinvested Dividends

The two charts below show the cumulative return of a dollar for the S&P 500 Index on a price only basis and total return that includes reinvested dividends since 1926. The second chart shows the power of compounding on a percentage basis.



Dividend Growers Have Outperformed with Less Risk



Investors continue to be rewarded with better risk adjusted returns by maintaining a focus on investing in dividend growth stocks. A recent report from Oppenheimer contained a Ned Davis Research chart noting the dividend growers and initiators continue to achieve higher risk adjusted returns for the period 1972 - 2008.

For investors then, continuing to focus on stocks/companies that increase the company's dividend on an annual basis can be a rewarding investment approach.

"...many of the dividend payers of final interest will likely tend to be large, more established, companies with market capitalizations of more than $5 billion, and this select set will comprise the bulk of our group. In an effort to boost returns, though, we will also seek out mid-cap stocks with good dividend prospects."


http://disciplinedinvesting.blogspot.com/2009/03/dividend-cuts-no-worse-than-in-prior.html

Carlsberg Financial Data (1998 to 2007)



No growth in net dividend.

What about its share price over the same period?

Dividend Aristocrats: A Comprehensive View

There tends to be much debate on whether dividends are a critical factor in determining the suitability of a particular investment. One fact is clear though and that is since 1926 the dividend component of the S&P 500 has accounted for one-third of the index's total return

Dividend Aristocrats have outperformed the S&P 500 Index on both a return basis and with less risk (beta).

The ability of management to maintain stable or increasing dividends indicate the quality of the firm’s earnings and its growth prospects.














The math behind compounding shows if one looses less in a down market, it takes a lower return to get back to even. In essence, if one looses less in the down market period, the portfolio will have more invested when the market turns around and moves higher.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/183829-dividend-aristocrats-a-comprehensive-view

More Gems from Buffett

Screen as many stocks as possible.  You will find a good investment among these many stocks.

The moment you find value in a good stock, buy and don't wait hoping to find a better one.

Cash is the worst form of investment.  You need to keep some cash so that your future is not determined by others.

Imagine being a farmer with your own farm.  The farm is productive but every 10 years, there are 2 severe drought years.  Do you sell your farm during those years?  No.  Similarly, in investing, be prepared for these bad years.


[My comment: In stock market investing, one can expect on average a bad year (a bear market) in every 5 years.]

The Principles of Dividend Investing

The point is that dividend growth followed earnings growth.

Fig. 1. JNJ Correlation of EPS Growth and Stock Price

Fig 2 BMY Correlation of EPS Growth and Stock Price

Fig. 3. JNJ Dividend and Price Performance

Fig. 4. BMY Dividend and Price Performance

Fig. 5. MCD Correlation of EPS Growth and Stock Price

Fig. 6. CLX Correlation of EPS Growth and Stock Price

Fig. 7. AFL Correlation of EPS Growth and Stock Price

http://seekingalpha.com/article/176988-the-principles-of-dividend-investing

Relative Contributions of Price Returns and Dividend Returns to Total Returns over the Decades



Stocks that pay dividends provide a nice inflation hedge since their revenues and net income would be affected by an increase in overall prices paid by consumers. Dividends soften losses during bear markets, and they provide the only sources for investment gains in troublesome times. In addition, dividend income takes away the need to sell large chunks of your portfolio in a declining market. Retirement income could be solely derived from dividends and their growth would compensate the dividend investor for the erosion in the purchasing power of the dollar.

If a retiree holds a diversified portfolio of stocks which have the ability to grow their dividend payments over time, they would be well prepared for retirement. They should be focusing on stocks with high yields and ability to grow dividends; stocks with average yields but with above average dividend growth and some domestic and foreign index funds for diversification.


http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2008/03/case-for-dividend-investing-in.html

The power of dividends is substantial, especially when you reinvest them.

The Power of Reinvesting Dividends


This chart, from Bernstein Global Wealth Management, demonstrates how reinvesting dividends can substantially improve your total returns.

http://www.investmentu.com/2008/April/mark-skousen.html

The Sweet Spot of Dividend Investing


The green area in the middle is the sweet spot: Initial dividend yields of between about 3% and 9%, combined with dividend growth rates of about 4% to 17%. Those are generally sustainable numbers, and it is where we will find most of the best dividend stocks for long-term investing.

In long-term dividend investing, one needs to control risk in many areas. Risk comes in many forms: selecting unsound companies; purchasing companies whose dividends are in peril; creating a portfolio that is insufficiently diversified; and so on.


Two important areas of risk to a long-term dividend strategy are the initial yield and expected growth rate of the dividend itself.


If you start out with too low a yield, it will take many years for the dividend to grow to where it provides a worthwhile return on your original investment. On the other hand, if you start out with too high a yield, it may well be that the dividend is unsustainable and in peril.


If the company typically increases its dividend at too slow a rate, again the dividend will take too long to grow into a desirable return. On the other hand, if you anticipate too fast a growth rate, the company may not achieve it.Plotting these two characteristics against each other--initial yield and anticipated dividend growth rate--gives us a diagram of the "sweet spot" in dividend investing.

Read more here:  The Sweet Spot of Dividend Investing

Relevant Articles:

- 10 by 10: A New Way to Look at Yield and Dividend Growth
- Yield on Cost Matters
- The Dividend Edge
- My Dividend Growth Plan - Strategy


This company grew its earnings and dividends healthily over the years. The point is that dividend growth followed earnings growth.



http://seekingalpha.com/article/176988-the-principles-of-dividend-investing

The DJIA Dividend Yield Points the Way






The Dow Jones Industrials Average dividend yield, for sixty years was a key bull and bear market-timing indicator.

http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_08/lundeen011009.html

Saturday 24 July 2010

Stocks that pay dividends have done better historically

Dividend Yield Investing



The dividend growth of this company is not fantastic.

There are also companies in Bursa paying increasing dividend over the years quite similar to the above company.

Stock Market vs. Dividend Yield



The Dividend Yield is another way to measure values in the stock market. This is the total dollar amount of the dividends paid on the DJIA stocks divided by the value of the DJIA.

Looking back at over 100 years of data for the DJIA, it is clear that stocks become over valued, i.e. too expensive, when their Dividend Yields are less than 4%. These low Dividend Yields represent major tops, and prices fall from there until Dividend Yields return to the long-term average of 6%, and then continue beyond that to a level where they are under valued, i.e. cheap, around 8-10%.

The 1929 top was formed at a DY of 3.5%, which resulted in a 3-year bear market that bottomed in 1932 at a DY of 17%.

The 1966 top was formed at a DY of 3.5%, which resulted in a 16-year bear market that bottomed in 1982 at a DY of 8%.

The 2000 top was formed at a DY of 1.2%; 66% lower than the top in 1929!! Currently, the DY stands at 2.5%, which is hardly cheap!! It is still beyond the level that formed the 1929 and 1966 tops!

History has shown that after a major top, a multi-year bear market should take prices back to a DY of about 10%, in order to work off the excesses of the previous bull market. This means that, by this measure, the DJIA should eventually drop to 3,500-4,000. That's when stocks will be cheap again!  



http://www.thefinancialhelpcenter.com/Stock-Market/Are-Stocks-Cheap.html

****The power of dividends is pretty obvious!



Investing in stocks that continually increase their dividends has the dramatic effect of consistently giving investors a raise each and every year. I have kept track of my own personal dividend income since really focusing on dividend growth as a strategy in 2005. Shooting forward almost 3 years and my dividend income has gone from $727 per year to its current $1320 per year.

The growth in this dividend income has come from two sources.

  1. The first and most obvious is that I have continued to add dividend growth stocks to my portfolio. Every time that I add a stock the resulting income can be quite substantial. For example when I added Coca-Cola in March 2005 I immediately added almost $30 in dividend income per year to my earnings.
  2. The second and less obvious source of the increase in dividend income is the dividend increases that my dividend stocks have done every year. This is metric that can move quite slowly at first, sometimes feeling like you are getting nowhere. However, over time as dividends are reinvested into more stock and the dividends are raised then the results can be quite dramatic. For example, in June 2006 I bought 16.4821 shares of Wal-Mart when it was throwing off $0.67 per share in dividends. Today, with no additional money added to the stock I now hold 16.9761 shares and the yearly dividend payment from the company is $0.95 per share. My hypothesis is that in 20 years from now the yearly dividends will have risen dramatically and my reinvested shares will be throwing off a very substantial sum of money – enough to retire on.

To create a reminder of the power of my strategy during times when dividend stocks are not performing as well in the market, I have created a quick and dirty chart that shows the trend in my dividend income. Every once in a while I create a new data point with my current dividend income and inevitably it shows my income rising.



http://www.thedividendguyblog.com/a-review-of-my-yearly-dividend-income/

Dividends for Top Bursa Malaysia Companies




It shows the normal dividends (Interim & Final) and any special dividend as well.
http://www.horizon.my/2008/11/dividends-for-top-bursa-malaysia-companies/

The results of reinvesting dividends




http://www.dividend.com/dividend-stock-library/dividend_reinvestment_plans.php

S&P 500 Dividend Yield versus 10 Year Treasury Yield



The 10 year U.S. Treasury yield has been greater than the S&P 500 Index dividend yield since 1958. However, in November 2008 the roles reversed when the S&P 500 yielded more than 10 year Treasuries. The chart above compares these yields from November 1993 to November 2008. Why do stocks, as represented by the S&P 500 Index, now yield more than bonds, as represented by the U.S. 10 Year Treasury?

Experts differ on the reasons, but one reason is simply market forces. The 10 year U.S. Treasury yield has been driven down as investors have moved out of stocks and into the safety of U.S. Treasuries, driving bond prices up. Bond yields go down when bond prices go up. The S&P 500 dividend yield has increased due to the recent sharp declines in stock prices. Dividend yield represents the trailing annual dividend per share divided by the current share price. Current stock prices have dropped at such a sharp rate that when dividing trailing annual dividends by current price, the dividend yield increased.

http://www.icmarc.org/xp/rc/marketview/chart/2008/20081212SP500DividendYield.html

An Increasing Dividend, but Lower Dividend Yield?



The graph above compares the annual cash dividend per share for all of the S&P 500 companies to their dividend yield since 1960. While it is evident that companies increased their cash dividends per share over time, it is also just as clear that their dividend yield fell. Many investors use dividend yield to find the percentage of a stock’s purchase price that the company will return to shareholders in dividends. Dividend yield can be calculated by dividing a stock’s annual dividend by its share price. For example, if a stock pays an annual dividend of $2 and is trading at $40 a share, it would have a yield of 5%. In 1987, the dividend yield on the S&P 500 Index reached 3.17% and over the following 20 years, the dividend yield declined to 1.77% during 2006. In the late 90's and early-to-mid 00’s, increases in stock price significantly outpaced the increases in dividends, which sent the S&P 500 dividend yield down. According to The Wall Street Journal, one of the reasons dividends grew at a slower pace than stock prices was due in part to companies reinvesting profits back into company operations instead of distributing dividends to shareholders. Although dividend yields for the S&P 500 Index remain lower than the historical average, dividends continue to increase shareholder wealth by providing a source of current income and total return for the investor.


http://www.icmarc.org/xp/rc/marketview/chart/2007/20070914dividendyield.html

Ex-dividend and cum-dividend explained




The four dates to consider are:
1. Declaration date: The date on which the board of directors announces to shareholders and the market as a whole that the company will pay a dividend.
2. 
Date of record: The date on which the company looks at its records to see who the shareholders of the company are. An investor must be listed as a shareholder to receive the dividend.
3. 
Date of payment: The date the company mails out the dividends.
4. 
Ex-dividend date: An investor must own the stock before the ex-dividend date to be eligible for the dividend payout.