Thursday 4 October 2012

The Everyday Lives Of Frugal Billionaires


When you think about the richest people in the world, you may envision them surrounded by all the trappings of wealth: race cars, yachts, mansions and other toys that most of the rest of us can only dream about. The term "frugal billionaire" may seem like an oxymoron, but a small subset of the richest of the rich are well-known for their penny-pinching ways. While most people will never have that kind of money to throw around, everyone can take a page from the fiscally-responsible habits of these billionaires. 







Warren Buffett
The Everyday Lives Of Frugal Billionaires

Probably the most famous cheapskate since Scrooge, Buffett lives a modest lifestyle despite his net worth of around $44 billion. He purchased a five-bedroom house in Omaha in 1958 for $31,500 and has lived there ever since. Buffett doesn't spend his money on electronics and reportedly doesn't carry a cell phone or have a computer at his desk. Although he could afford a whole fleet of limousines to be at his beck and call, he prefers to drive himself and owns a Cadillac DTS, which comes in at a modest $50,000 or so. When it comes to entertainment, the investment mogul shuns splashy parties and trips and spends his time playing bridge.



Mark Zuckerberg
Zuckerberg makes the list as the world's youngest billionaire. Though he's still in his 20s, this Facebook creator has an estimated net worth of $17.5 billion. Almost all of his money is tied up in the social media company's equity. It can be argued that Zuckerberg simply hasn't had enough time to splash his wealth around or that it really doesn't exist until he takes the company public later this year. By all accounts, Zuckerberg keeps his life low-key and spends up to 16 hours a day at the office. He doesn't own his home, but prefers to rent a house down the road from Facebook's Palo Alto headquarters. Zuckerberg chooses t-shirts and jeans over expensive tailored suits and sneakers and sandals over Italian leather loafers.



Carlos Slim Helu
In 2010, Helu passed Bill Gates on the billionaire list to become the richest man in the world, with an estimated net worth of $69 billion. He built his fortune in Mexico, where he owns over 200 companies including Telmex, the country's largest telephone service provider. He shares many frugal traits with Warren Buffett, including living in a modest home and eschewing computers. Helu, widowed since 1999, spends most of his downtime at home with his six children and his grandchildren. In a country where security is often sketchy, he still chooses to drive himself wherever he goes. Although much more dandily dressed than Mark Zuckerberg, Helu purchases most of his clothing off the rack from one of the many retail franchises he owns.



John Caudwell
You might argue that Caudwell, now retired from the British cellphone empire he built from scratch, doesn't belong on this list at all. He owns many rich toys including a helicopter, yacht and a car worth more than most people's homes. When it comes to wasting money, Caudwell is a skinflint at heart. He cuts his own hair because he thinks barbershops are a waste of time and money. He buys his clothing off the rack at the British retailer Marks and Spencer. Before retirement, he would bike 14 miles to work each day rather than have someone drive him in his Bentley. Now, he bikes 40 miles every week to and from his favorite pub.


The Bottom Line
The uber-wealthy don't always live the high life, which helps them stay rich. The frugal billionaires listed above all came from modest means and frugality was learned and practiced by their families. They carried these lessons with them in business and, one hopes, they will pass them on to their children.


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0412/the-everyday-lives-of-frugal-billionaires.aspx#ixzz28JPtDUir

A look at the stock/quotes table


Open any financial paper and you will see stock quotes that look something like the image below. In this section, we'll explain how to make sense of these tables so that you can use the information to your advantage.

Let's take a look at the stock/quotes table:

Columns 1 & 2: 52-Week High and Low. These are the highest and lowest prices at which a stock has traded over the past 52 weeks (1 year). This typically does not include the previous day's trading.

Column 3: Company Name and Type of Stock. This column lists the name of the company. If there are no special symbols or letters following the name, it is common stock. Different symbols imply different classes of shares. For example, "pf" means the shares are preferred stock.

Column 4: Ticker Symbol. This is the unique alphabetic name which identifies the stock. If you watch financial TV, the ticker tape will quote the latest prices alongside this symbol. If you are looking for stock quotes online, you always search for a company by the ticker symbol. If you don't know a particular company's ticker symbol, you can search for it at Yahoo Finance.
Column 5: Dividend Per Share. This indicates the annual dividend payment per share. If this space is blank, the company does not currently pay out dividends.

Column 6: Dividend Yield. The percentage return on the dividend, dividend yield is calculated as annual dividends per share divided by price per share.

Column 7: Price/Earnings Ratio (P/E ratio). This is calculated by dividing the current stock price by earnings per share from the last four quarters. (For more on how to interpret this, see Understand The P/E Ratio.)

Column 8: Trading VolumeThis figure shows the total number of shares traded for the day, listed in hundreds. To get the actual number traded, add two zeros to the end of the number listed.

Column 9 & 10: Day High and Low. This indicates the price range in which the stock has traded throughout the day. In other words, these are the maximum and the minimum prices that people have paid for the stock.

Column 11: Close. The close is the last trading price recorded when the market closed on the day. If the closing price is more than 5% above or below the previous day's close, the entire listing for that stock is bold-faced. Keep in mind, you are not guaranteed to get this price if you buy the stock the next day because the price is constantly changing, even after the exchange is closed for the day. The close is merely an indicator of past performance and, except in extreme circumstances, it serves as a ballpark of what you should expect to pay.




Column 12: Net Change.
 This is the dollar value change in the stock price from the previous day's closing price. When you hear about a stock being "up for the day," it means the net change was positive.

Quotes on the Internet
Nowadays, it's far more convenient for most people to get stock quotes off the internet. This method is superior because most sites update throughout the day and give you more information, news, charting and research.

To get quotes, simply enter the ticker symbol into the quote box of any major financial site like Yahoo FinanceCBS Marketwatch, or Quicken.com. The example below shows a quote for Microsoft (MSFT) from Yahoo Finance. The data can be interpreted exactly as it would if it were from the newspaper.


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/university/tables/tables1.asp#ixzz28JJkx9Ou

A look at a currency table


Now, let's take a look at a currency table:

Row 1 & Column 1: Currency Name (or symbol) The currencies are exactly the same in both the column and the row. This table allows you to compare the value of a currency in relation to another. The only exception on this table is gold, which is commonly quoted in currency tables because it is considered to be an alternative currency that anyone can purchase.

If you are reading this table the values are in the following context:

$1 in currency of row #1, is worth $___ in column #1 dollars.

For example, 1 euro is worth $1.3926 in Canadian dollars. If you were in Canada and you wanted to exchange your 1 euro for Canadian dollars, you would get $1.3926 in return. On the other side of the equation, if you had $1 Canadian and you wanted to convert it to euros, you would get 0.7181 in return. Both of these numbers are circled in red on the table.
It is also important to note that 1/1.3926 = 0.7181. If you only have the currency rate for one direction, then all you need to do is divide one by that number to find the value in the other country's currency.


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/university/tables/tables5.asp#ixzz28JIVJCza

A look at the mutual fund table


Take a look at the mutual fund table below:

Columns 1 & 2: 52-Week High and Low. These are the mutual fund's highest and lowest over the previous 52 weeks (1 year). This typically does not include the previous day's price.

Column 3: Fund Name. This column lists the name of the mutual fund. The company that manages the fund is written above the column in bold type.

Column 4: Fund Specifics. Different letters and symbols have various meanings. For example, a "*" means the fund is retirement account eligible, "N" means no load, "F" is front-end load, and "B" means the fund has both front and back-end fees. For other symbols, see the legend that accompanies the financial tables in your newspaper.

Column 5: Dollar Change. The dollar change in the price of the mutual fund from the previous day's trading.

Column 6: % Change. The percentage change in the price of the mutual fund from the previous day's trading.
Column 7: Week High. The highest price at which the fund traded during the past week.

Column 8: Week Low. The lowest price at which the fund traded during the past week.

Column 9: Close. The last price at which the fund traded.

Column 10: Week's Dollar Change. The dollar change in the price of the mutual fund from the previous week.

Column 11: Week's % Change. The percentage change in the price of the mutual fund from the previous week. 


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/university/tables/tables4.asp#ixzz28JHnCUuf

A look at the bond table

Let's take a look at the bond table, and see how to break it down. 


Column 1: Issuer. This is the company, state, province or country that is issuing the bond

Column 2: Coupon. The coupon refers to the fixed interest rate that the issuer pays to the lender. The coupon rate varies by bond. 

Column 3: Maturity Date. This is the date when the borrower will pay the principal back to the lenders (investors). Typically, only the last two digits of the year are quoted, so 25 means 2025, 04 is 2004, etc. 

Column 4: Bid Price. This is the price that someone is willing to pay for the bond. It is quoted in relation to 100, regardless of the par value. Think of the bond price as a percentage, a bond with a bid of $93 means it is trading at 93% of its par value. 

Column 5: Yield. The yield indicates the annual return until the bond matures. Yield is calculated by the amount of interest paid on a bond divided by the price -- it is a measure of the income generated by a bond. If the bond is callable it will have a "c" followed by the year in which the bond can be called. For example, c10 means the bond can be called as early as 2010. 

Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/university/tables/tables3.asp#ixzz28JH2UqLJ

A look at the Options table


Let's take a look at the Options table:

Column 1: Strike Price. This is the stated price per share for which underlying stock may be purchased (for a call) or sold (for a put) by the option holder upon exercise of the option contract. When you exercise a call option, this is the value for which you purchase the shares. Option strike prices typically move in increments of $2.50 or $5. In the example above, the strike price moves in $2 increments.

Column 2: Expiry Date. This shows the end of the life of an options contract. Options expire on the third Friday of the expiry month.

Column 3: Call or Put. This column refers to whether the option is a call or a put. A call is the option to purchase, whereas a put is the option to sell.

Column 4: Volume. This indicates the total number of options contracts traded for the day. The total volume of all contracts is listed at the bottom of each table.
Column 5: Bid. The price someone is willing to pay for the options contract. To get the cost of one contract you need to multiply the price by 100.

Column 6: Ask. The price for which someone is willing to sell an options contract. To get the cost of one contract you need to multiply the price by 100.

Column 7: Open InterestOpen interest is the number of options contracts that are open. These are contracts that have not expired or have not been exercised.


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/university/tables/tables6.asp#ixzz28JFzYsK6

Morgan Stanley’s Best Stocks for Long-Term Growth

Laura Joszt

Published: Monday, October 1st 2012




Although stock picking is incredibly inaccurate and often wrong, that doesn’t stop analysts from predicting which stocks they think will do the best. Given the state of the world, Morgan Stanley has come up with its list of stocks that do well no matter how the economy is doing.

Europe is still fighting off a debt crisis, China’s economy is finally slowing down and the U.S. is facing a scary fiscal cliff at the end of 2012 (in addition to the end of the world?). Plus, investors seem to be scared of stocks again. And the truth is no one can really predict where the economies of the world are going — although they will try their hardest to come up with accurate indicators.

Business Insider has posted the 42 stocks on Morgan Stanley’s list that should help investors in this uncertain environment. These companies benefit from strong long-term growth prospects, so don’t expect to make a quick buck and get out like other stocks.

Here are the companies on the list with the highest earnings per share (EPS) growth.

Note: The EPS growth is the projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2011 to 2014; the P/E estimates are based on 2012 EPS expectations; and the PEG ratio refers to the price earnings to growth ratio, which is an indicator of the stock's valuation.

Stock information and estimates are from Morgan Stanley.

10. Lululemon Athletica


Ticker: LULU
EPS growth: 29.9%
P/E 2012: 40.0
PEG ratio: 1.3

9. American Tower


Ticker: AMT
EPS growth: 34.3%
P/E 2012: 50.1
PEG ratio: 1.5

8. Apple

Ticker: AAPL
EPS growth: 34.4%
P/E 2012: 15.4
PEG ratio: 0.4
7. Under Armour


Ticker: UA
EPS growth: 34.5%
P/E 2012: 45.1
PEG ratio: 1.3
6. Rackspace Hosting Inc.


Ticker: RAX
EPS growth: 35.3%
P/E 2012: 87.0
PEG ratio: 2.5

5. Michael Kors Holdings


Ticker: KORS
EPS growth: 40.0%
P/E 2012: 37.2
PEG ratio: 0.9

4. (tie) Fusion-io


Ticker: FIO
EPS growth: 43.8%
P/E 2012: 83.6
PEG ratio: 1.9

4. (tie) Amazon


Ticker: AMZN
EPS growth: 43.8%
P/E 2012: 327.9
PEG ratio: 7.5
2. Crown Castle


Ticker: CCI
EPS growth: 50.1%
P/E 2012: 67.6
PEG ratio: 1.3
1. Linkedin Corp


Ticker: LNKD
EPS growth: 89.9%
P/E 2012: 214.1
PEG ratio: 2.4

The information contained in this article should not be construed as investment advice or as a solicitation to buy or sell any stock.

Read more:
Morgan Stanley: These 42 Stocks are Winners No Matter What Happens in the Economy – Business Insider

Wednesday 3 October 2012

How the rich get richer and you can, too


By Mitch Tuchman
We all know, innately, how the rich get richer. Money begets money. But how does that actually happen, aside from compounding interest and purely financial factors?
You could take the cynic's view that the game is rigged. But the more accurate answer, backed by research, is that the rich get richer because of great parenting. How rich you become over your lifetime is directly related to how early you capture the basic truths of finance and investing.
You have seen the exception that proves the rule, the rich kid who blows his family's wealth in a generation through poor decisions. Chalk that up to absentee parents. Truly, teaching is the missing link.
In a paper unveiled a few months ago, researchers led by Annamaria Lusardi, professor of economics at George Washington University, found that an early understanding of financial concepts accounts for as much as half of the wealth gap between the affluent and those with low incomes . Lusardi also found an exponential effect: Those who acquire financial understanding early tend to accumulate assets faster and those with more assets tend to keep learning about personal finance because they have more at stake. (Emphasis added)
There are two powerful forces at work here, in terms of how the rich get richer. Let's tease them out so that you can benefit from the knowledge.
First and foremost, how the rich get richer has a lot to do with picking the right parents. Kidding aside, being born into a developed-country household, availing yourself of a quality education at a low relative cost, enjoying the benefits of a healthy diet and a safe childhood, all of these things give a person automatic advantages.
Yet there are people born into good circumstances who nevertheless seem to just "get by." They see the rich get richer and, quite rightly, question their own choices.
Instead, they should question, or at least examine, their parents' choices. Kids don't listen to what their parents say. They do what their parents do. A parent who saves diligently and consumes moderately is setting a very good, lifelong example for his or her children. A parent who constantly overspends and lives in debt does not.

How the rich get richer: They start early

But the kicker here is learning by doing: Teaching by example is great, but a child learns the power of saving and investing not only by seeing it done by others but by doing it themselves. Practice is how the rich get richer.
Once a young person gets a little bit of capital set aside, they begin to think more conservatively about money: How can I protect and grow that wealth? What are the risks to my plan?
How the rich get richer is by passing on simple lessons about compound interest, about risk and reward, and about the role of money in a healthy, happy life. Rich parents don't fear money; they consider it a useful tool. Those attitudes pass on, compounding in value with each succeeding generation.
Working hard at getting an education is a great base. The simple act of periodic, automatic saving is another excellent lesson. Prudent, effective investing is yet another.

Can Drive-Through Grocery Shopping Save Tesco?

Bloomberg's Tom Gibson on how Tesco is trying to win back customers with their `click-and-collect' service.

Tesco Seen to Regain Market Share Through 2013



Oct. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Bryan Roberts, an analyst at Kantar Retail, talks about competition between U.K. retailers Tesco Plc and J Sainsbury Plc. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television's "On the Move." (Source: Bloomberg)

Tesco Reports First Profit Decline in Almost Two Decades


By Sarah Shannon - Oct 3, 2012 3:20 PM GMT+0800

So-called trading profit, a measure that excludes property gains, fell 11 percent to 1.59 billion pounds ($2.6 billion) in the six months ended Aug. 25, the Cheshunt, England-based retailer said in a statement today. The average estimate of 12 analysts compiled by Bloomberg was 1.62 billion pounds.
Chief Executive Officer Philip Clarke has pledged to invest 1 billion pounds in new products, additional staffing and Tesco’s 2,900 U.K. stores as he seeks to boost a leading market position that fell to a seven-year low earlier this year. Same- store sales rose in the second quarter, snapping a run of six straight quarterly declines.
“The last couple of years have shown us that even the giants can falter when they take their eye off the shopper,” said Bryan Roberts, an analyst at Kantar Retail in London. Still, the second-quarter sales performance “tell us that its underperformance in the U.K. may well have bottomed out.”
Tesco fell as much as 2.1 percent in London trading and was down 1.7 percent at 331 pence as of 8:06 a.m. The shares have fallen 18 percent this year, while those of competitor J Sainsbury Plc have gained 14 percent.

Sainsbury Sales

Sainsbury said today that U.K. same-store sales growth accelerated to 1.9 percent in the second quarter on a basis that excludes gasoline as it stepped up price competition with Tesco.
Tesco’s same-store sales rose 0.1 percent in the most recent quarter, excluding fuel and value-added tax, the first increase since the third quarter of the 2011 financial year.
“The changes are coming through at a pace,'' Clarke said on a conference call. ''Customers are starting to tell us they like what they’re seeing. I wouldn’t be saying we’ve turned the corner, we’re on the road.”
The CEO said the external environment “continues to present challenges all over the world.”
In South Korea, Tesco’s second-largest market after the U.K., profit was hurt by restrictions to store opening hours. Business in European countries including Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary was affected by the debt crisis and falling consumer sentiment. The retailer gets about a third of sales and earnings from outside of the U.K.
Tesco maintained the first-half dividend at 4.63 pence, the first time this century that it hasn’t raised the payout.

Tuesday 2 October 2012

10 rules for multiplying personal wealth


http://business.rediff.com/report/2009/jul/09/perfin-10-rules-for-multiplying-personal-wealth.htm



I have the privilege of teaching financial planning courses at local colleges and adult learning centers.


One of the things we do in class is recite and write down a set of rules I hope each student can learn to live by.


Here are a few key rules to remember:
Rule 1: Be systematic, unemotional and diversified
This is the very first rule we touch on right from the beginning. There's a popular bumper sticker that says, "I'm spending my grandkids' inheritance."
That whole idea just frustrates me. In some ways, our society's personality is such that if we can spend our money before we die, we've lived a great life. But you can't do that.
Rule 2: Never spend principal
That's the second rule. Inflation has gone above 10 per cent in the US economy five times, and I'd bet you it will happen again.
Rule 3: Never borrow money to buy a depreciating asset
Almost everybody does this at some point. But as soon as possible, and definitely by retirement, you have to get back to a cash basis.
How many people know what a $30,000 car bought on credit costs them at age 25? In retirement dollars, at age 65 and assuming a hypothetical 10 per cent return, that financed car could cost as much as $11,314 a month in potential income. Forever!
So, do you or your children understand what an "investment" in a car really costs you? Yes, I know we all buy cars. But try to imagine what would happen if I got every 25-year-old to forgo just one car purchase and invest that same amount of money in their long-term retirement goals. What a huge difference that could make to their choices at retirement!
Rule 4: Never save money in a spending account
Keep separate bank accounts for saving and spending. You have to save in savings accounts. If you truly want those savings to grow, use an account that helps you leave the money at work, rather than a "slush fund" that's easy to dip into.
People tell me they are saving $545 a month in an account. Yet when I ask them how much they have accumulated after seven years of doing this, their answer is often $1,123 because they spend out of that same account.
It is not a save-to-save account -- it's a save-to-spend account! If you know you're not naturally a disciplined saver, make it harder to get at the money. You'll be doing yourself a favor in the long run.
Rule 5: Use half, save half
Every time you pay off a debt, get a pay raise, get a bonus, or have any excess cash, have fun with half the money, and put the other half toward your long-term goals.
This is one of the best rules, especially for younger people. By following this rule consistently, in ten years, most people are amazed at how much they can save.
Whether you save or not has nothing to do with how much money you make. Either you save or you don't. It's a habit. Make a habit of investing half of any windfall, big or small, right off the top.
Rule 6: Always use matching money
For example, your employer's 401(k) matching program (in India [ Images ], the employer's matching Providend Fund Contribution, for example).
Do whatever you must to take advantage of matched contributions in a retirement plan. You can't afford not to take the free money.
Hypothetically speaking, if you invest $100 take-home pay in a taxable investment (25 per cent tax on growth) at an assumed 10 per cent return, you would potentially have $135,586 in 30 years (sales charges and fees not included).
If you put the same $100 into your 401(k) that is 100 per cent matched, now you have $150 a month saved because of the tax savings.
Meanwhile your boss adds $150 because of the match -- and it grows tax-deferred, too! Using the same hypothetical return scenario, we have $683,797 to live on -- five times as much wealth with the same work.
Sometimes being smart with our money is a phenomenal advantage. This is a classic example of where investor behavior, not investment performance, makes a huge difference in your long-term wealth potential. You can hate your boss, or plan to quit, but you must take advantage of the matched money.
Rule 7: Do not spend more than you make
This should seem painfully obvious, but people often have no idea how much they're really spending and what relationship that has to how much they make.
In making a budget people often cannot account for 30 per cent of the money they earn and where it goes.
If you are just a little more vigilant, you can significantly enhance your long-term ability to reach your goals.
A budget doesn't happen by accident; it takes practice and is an ever-changing tool in our financial planning. Practice makes perfect. Although "perfect" is never the ideal word for a budget, it does have more meaning and usefulness the longer we practice its use.
Rule 8: Never leave undivided real property to joint beneficiaries
Lots of things are more important than money. Family is probably at the top of the list. If you want a vicious family feud on your hands, breaking this rule would be a great place to start.
Imagine a farm that gets left to four sons: One has farmed it for 20 years; one is an environmentalist and wants it to be a park; one is broke and needs money; and one could not care less about it. Who will get wealthy from this plan? The attorneys. And the kids and grandkids will probably hate each other forever.
Remember that 'equal', 'equitable', and 'fair' are three different words with three totally different meanings.
Rule 9: Never name co-trustees or co-executors of your estate
This one goes right along with the undivided property rule above. Next to poor planning, litigation can be the biggest financial drain on an estate.
Minimize the number of trusted decision-makers, and you'll reduce your chances for litigation. What's more, the entire process will be easier and more efficient with one decision-maker.
Rule 10: Above all --
--Be happy with what you have, and it will lead to both unbelievable financial success and personal (not mere financial) wealth!
[Excerpt from The Invincible Investor: 10 Top Financial Planners Reveal the Secrets of Loss-Proof Investing(www.visionbooksindia.com/details.asp?isbn=8170947456) Published by Vision Books.]


7 investment risks and how to deal with them


T
he fact is that you cannot get rich without taking risks. Risks and rewards go hand in hand; and, typically, higher the risk you take, higher the returns you can expect. In fact, the first major Zurich Axiom on risk says: "Worry is not a sickness but a sign of health. If you are not worried, you are not risking enough". Then the minor axiom says: "Always play for meaningful stakes".


The secret, in other words, is to take calculated risks, not reckless risks.

In financial terms, among other things, it implies the possibility of receiving lower than expected return, or not receiving any return at all, or even not getting your principal amount back.

Every investment opportunity carries some risks or the other. In some investments, a certain type of risk may be predominant, and others not so significant. A full understanding of the various important risks is essential for taking calculated risks and making sensible investment decisions.


Seven major risks are present in varying degrees in different types of investments.

Default risk
This is the most frightening of all investment risks. The risk of non-payment refers to both the principal and the interest. For all unsecured loans, e.g. loans based on promissory notes, company deposits, etc., this risk is very high. Since there is no security attached, you can do nothing except, of course, go to a court when there is a default in refund of capital or payment of accrued interest.
Given the present circumstances of enormous delays in our legal systems, even if you do go to court and even win the case, you will still be left wondering who ended up being better off - you, the borrower, or your lawyer!
So, do look at the CRISIL / ICRA credit ratings for the company before you invest in company deposits or debentures.

Business risk
The market value of your investment in equity shares depends upon the performance of the company you invest in. If a company's business suffers and the company does not perform well, the market value of your share can go down sharply.
This invariably happens in the case of shares of companies which hit the IPO market with issues at high premiums when the economy is in a good condition and the stock markets are bullish. Then if these companies could not deliver upon their promises, their share prices fall drastically.
When you invest money in commercial, industrial and business enterprises, there is always the possibility of failure of that business; and you may then get nothing, or very little, on a pro-rata basis in case of the firm's bankruptcy.
A recent example of a banking company where investors were exposed to business risk was of Global Trust Bank. Global Trust Bank, promoted by Ramesh Gelli, slipped into serious problems towards the end of 2003 due to NPA-related issues.
However, the Reserve Bank of India's [Get Quote] decision to merge it with Oriental Bank of Commerce [Get Quote] was timely. While this protected the interests of stakeholders such as depositors, employees, creditors and borrowers was protected, interests of investors, especially small investors were ignored and they lost their money.
The greatest risk of buying shares in many budding enterprises is the promoter himself, who by overstretching or swindling may ruin the business.

Liquidity risk
Money has only a limited value if it is not readily available to you as and when you need it. In financial jargon, the ready availability of money is called liquidity. An investment should not only be safe and profitable, but also reasonably liquid.
An asset or investment is said to be liquid if it can be converted into cash quickly, and with little loss in value. Liquidity risk refers to the possibility of the investor not being able to realize its value when required. This may happen either because the security cannot be sold in the market or prematurely terminated, or because the resultant loss in value may be unrealistically high.
Current and savings accounts in a bank, National Savings Certificates, actively traded equity shares and debentures, etc. are fairly liquid investments. In the case of a bank fixed deposit, you can raise loans up to 75% to 90% of the value of the deposit; and to that extent, it is a liquid investment.
Some banks offer attractive loan schemes against security of approved investments, like selected company shares, debentures, National Savings Certificates, Units, etc. Such options add to the liquidity of investments.
The relative liquidity of different investments is highlighted in Table 1.
Table 1
Liquidity of Various Investments
Liquidity
Some Examples
Very high
Cash, gold, silver, savings and current accounts in banks, G-Secs
High
Fixed deposits with banks, shares of listed companies that are actively traded, units, mutual fund shares
Medium
Fixed deposits with companies enjoying high credit rating, debentures of good companies that are actively traded
Low and very low
Deposits and debentures of loss-making and cash-strapped companies, inactively traded shares, unlisted shares and debentures, real estate
Don't, however, be under the impression that all listed shares and debentures are equally liquid assets. Out of the 8,000-plus listed stocks, active trading is limited to only around 1,000 stocks. A-group shares are more liquid than B-group shares. The secondary market for debentures is not very liquid in India. Several mutual funds are stuck with PSU stocks and PSU bonds due to lack of liquidity.

Purchasing power risk, or inflation risk
Inflation means being broke with a lot of money in your pocket. When prices shoot up, the purchasing power of your money goes down. Some economists consider inflation to be a disguised tax.
Given the present rates of inflation, it may sound surprising but among developing countries, India is often given good marks for effective management of inflation. The average rate of inflation in India has been less than 8% p.a. during the last two decades.
However, the recent trend of rising inflation across the globe is posing serious challenge to the governments and central banks. In India's case, inflation, in terms of the wholesale prices, which remained benign during the last few years, began firming up from June 2006 onwards and topped double digits in the third week of June 2008. The skyrocketing prices of crude oil in international markets as well as food items are now the two major concerns facing the global economy, including India.
Ironically, relatively "safe" fixed income investments, such as bank deposits and small savings instruments, etc., are more prone to ravages of inflation risk because rising prices erode the purchasing power of your capital. "Riskier" investments such as equity shares are more likely to preserve the value of your capital over the medium term.

Interest rate risk
In this deregulated era, interest rate fluctuation is a common phenomenon with its consequent impact on investment values and yields. Interest rate risk affects fixed income securities and refers to the risk of a change in the value of your investment as a result of movement in interest rates.
Suppose you have invested in a security yielding 8 per cent p.a. for 3 years. If the interest rates move up to 9 per cent one year down the line, a similar security can then be issued only at 9 per cent. Due to the lower yield, the value of your security gets reduced.

Political risk
The government has extraordinary powers to affect the economy; it may introduce legislation affecting some industries or companies in which you have invested, or it may introduce legislation granting debt-relief to certain sections of society, fixing ceilings of property, etc.
One government may go and another come with a totally different set of political and economic ideologies. In the process, the fortunes of many industries and companies undergo a drastic change. Change in government policies is one reason for political risk.
Whenever there is a threat of war, financial markets become panicky. Nervous selling begins. Security prices plummet. In case a war actually breaks out, it often leads to sheer pandemonium in the financial markets. Similarly, markets become hesitant whenever elections are round the corner. The market prefers to wait and watch, rather than gamble on poll predictions.
International political developments also have an impact on the domestic scene, what with markets becoming globalized. This was amply demonstrated by the aftermath of 9/11 events in the USA and in the countdown to the Iraq war early in 2003. Through increased world trade, India is likely to become much more prone to political events in its trading partner-countries.

Market risk
Market risk is the risk of movement in security prices due to factors that affect the market as a whole. Natural disasters can be one such factor. The most important of these factors is the phase (bearish or bullish) the markets are going through. Stock markets and bond markets are affected by rising and falling prices due to alternating bullish and bearish periods: Thus:
  • Bearish stock markets usually precede economic recessions.
  • Bearish bond markets result generally from high market interest rates, which, in turn, are pushed by high rates of inflation.
  • Bullish stock markets are witnessed during economic recovery and boom periods.
  • Bullish bond markets result from low interest rates and low rates of inflation.
How to manage risks
Not all the seven types of risks may be present at one time, in any single investment. Secondly, many-a-times the various kinds of risks are interlinked. Thus, investment in a company that faces high business risk automatically has a higher liquidity risk than a similar investment in other companies with a lesser degree of business risk.
It is important to carefully assess the existence of each kind of risk, and its intensity in whichever investment opportunity you may consider. However, let not the very presence of risk paralyse you into inaction. Please remember that there is always some risk or the other in every investment option; no risk, no gain!
What is important is to clearly grasp the nature and degree of risk present in a particular case � and whether it is a risk you can afford to, and are willing to, take.
Success skill in managing your investments lies in achieving the right balance between risks and returns. Where risk is high, returns can also be expected to be high, as may be seen from Figure 1.
Figure 1: The Risk-Return Trade-Off
Once you understand the risks involved in different investments, you can choose your comfort zone and stay there. That's the way to wealth.
(Excerpt from Personal Investment & Tax Planning Yearbook (FY 2008-09) by N. J. Yasaswy, published by Vision Books.)
Published by 





Related:

The Malaysian Airline Business


The Malaysian Airline Business

Now that the "low-cost" airline has successfully crippled the "national flag carrier", it does look like the small fly may eat the big bug, in small snatches.

Introducing the low cost airline cannot be to "increase competition" of the Malaysian aviation industry. You have two totally different products: one "full cost" and the other "low cost". In no way should "full cost" be thought of as "high cost" and "low cost" to be "better value". It is just the way the competitor has cleverly maneuvered itself into the public psyche that created this perception. If pricing is cost-plus, then one should be getting probably almost the same value for the services rendered.

As a corollary, it is also true that "low cost" means "low price" (which the airline is now trying to reposition itself) but not necessarily "better value." The apparent disgust that the low cost operator treats its customers must be something that the average consumer must constantly deal with which in more technical parlance means the loss of consumer rights. It is OK for the operator not to deliver as promised, but woe betide the consumer who happens to try to alter a little bit of the contract. It is this lopsidedness that is the peculiar feature of the "business model" of the low cost flyer, and not its much touted greater "operational efficiency". If you set a computer system to deal with customers who have not way to communicate back to the system, and if you program the computer system to generate a certain amount of profit from every customer, then obviously you are going to get that profit as programmed. Once the "parameters" change, as we see the low cost flyer pulling out of Europe, then you know that it is out of its depth to cope with a more challenging environment.

It is not rocket science to know that to get the average price down, every flight must operate at a certain high capacity. It is this targeting that we see to be promotional strategy of the low cost flyer, as well as the constant attempt to juggle flights in order to pack passengers into a certain targeted "high capacity" which is otherwise termed as operational efficiency.

The national carrier becomes disoriented when the low cost flyer enters the story. How does one compete with a "low cost" competitor? This is the wrong question. The correct response is how to redefine the full-cost market now that the competitor is going to soak up all the cheap customers. It is not surprising if the first impact the national carrier feels is that more than half of its customers are all gone. If we work on the simple Pareto rule of 20% business class and 80% economy class and if the normal capacity on the economy class is 60% and if half of the 80% is lost to the competitor, then you have a mix of 20% business class and 20% economy class. It is instant death to the national carrier.

The objective of the national carrier must be to concentrate on how to get back its economy class passengers. By imitating the competitor in its treatment of customers, the national carrier takes the risk of alienating itself from its customer base. Its computer system is not geared to dealing with online booking and changes to online booking. It simply does not know how to handling this cut-throat business of low price. Instead, the national carrier should build up a new market for traditional full-service flying and at the  same time overhaul its operating system to lower cost by automating more of its internal operations. Instead, the national carrier tries to become a low cost flyer and in the process simply cannot compete as the low cost competitor is king in the business of low cost flying. It automates all its external communications with the customers, an area where the old method should have given it an edge. The national carrier has fallen into a trap, all on its own doing.

At the end of the day, probably one of the most vital factors that determines which airline survives in this globally competitive business is its management of its cost of fuel - supposedly a major cost element. If this is set right, all the other costs are small in comparison. If the fuel cost is too high, then it has to weather it. The low cost flyer simply pass this down to the average consumer in the form of a "fuel surcharge" which really is one of the most appalling abuses of consumers in the market place. Unable to get a team to get its fuel cost right, the response to saving the national carrier is to send in a marketing and accounting team to manage the accounts, and probably not the operations. The operations can only deteriorate with neglect.


So how does one then "rationalise" the national carrier with the low cost flyer? It is as if the low cost flyer has business class travellers to bring to the table, while it will certainly try to soak up the remaining of the economy class passengers from the national carrier. There is also room for further cannibalism by the small of the big. What other experience and expertise does one have that the other does not have.

The Malaysian airline business may just be one episode that shows the general fragility of the national economic fabric. There is a lot of communications and clever talk, but all those who could do are sidelined and relegated to the dungeon to work in the galley to keep the ship going.