Sunday 6 December 2009

Global recession timeline

Global recession timeline


How did the credit crunch at the end of 2007 become a full financial meltdown by the middle of 2008, and finally turn into a global recession?

This interactive timeline highlights key dates in the financial collapse and helps you find the original reports of the events as they happened.

Click on an event on the timeline here:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8242825.stm



8 February 2007: HSBC WARNS OF SUBPRIME LOSSES

HSBC reveals huge losses at its US mortgage arm Household Finance due to subprime losses, in one of the first signs that the US housing market is turning sour, and that it could have a knock-on effect on the global financial sector.


2 April 2007: NEW CENTURY GOES BUST

New Century Financial, a leading subprime lender, files for bankruptcy. It is the first signal that something is seriously amiss at US mortgage lenders. Shares in other US mortgages banks like Countrywide come under pressure.


9 August 2007: CREDIT MARKETS FREEZE

Credit markets go into freefall after Paribas announces that two of its hedge funds are frozen due to "complete evaporation of liquidity" in asset backed security market. European Central Bank injects 170bn euros into the banking market and Fed lowers interest rates. Bank of England refuses to intervene in credit markets.


14 September 2007: RUN ON THE ROCK

Savers in beleaguered UK former building society Northern Rock begin withdrawing their savings after the BBC reveals the bank has received emergency financial support from the Bank of England. Northern Rock is in trouble as it was heavily reliant on the wholesale money market to fund its operations, and these markets have dried up.


17 March 2008: BEAR STEARNS RESCUE

US investment bank Bear Stearns is rescued by rival bank JP Morgan Chase after the US government provides a $30bn guarantee against its mounting losses. It is the first sign that, rather than easing, the financial crisis is getting worse but investors are relieved that US government prepared to act as lender of last resort.


7 September 2008: FANNIE MAE RESCUE

US government rescues giant mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, taking them into temporary public ownership after they reveal huge losses on the US subprime mortgage market. Their failure would have triggered a run on the dollar as many foreign governments had invested in their bonds, believing they were already guaranteed by the government.


15 September 2008: LEHMAN BROTHERS GOES BANKRUPT

US investment bank Lehman Brothers goes bankrupt after the US government refuses to bail it out. Merrill Lynch is bought by Bank of America after revealing it also is facing huge losses. Insurance firm AIG, which issued credit guarantees for subprime mortgages, is rescued the next day with an $85bn loan from US Treasury.


17 September 2008: LLOYDS TAKES OVER HBOS

Lloyds agrees a £12.2bn takeover of the ailing Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS), the UK's largest mortgage lender, after its shares plummet amid concerns over the firm's future. The UK government invokes a national interest clause to bypass competition law, as the new bank is responsible for close to one-third of the UK's savings and mortgage market.


3 October 2008: $700BN BAILOUT APPROVED BY CONGRESS

The biggest financial rescue in US history is approved after a gruelling debate in Congress, and initial defeat a week earlier. Republicans and Democrats alike were reluctant to bail out the banks with such large sums while ordinary citizens were suffering in the recession. Both presidential candidates endorse the bail-out.


13 October 2008: UK GOVERNMENT RESCUES RBS AND LLOYDS-HBOS

Two of the UK's major banks, RBS and HBOS, are in major trouble as financial markets collapse. Having merged with HBOS in September, Lloyds is hit by the huge debts built up by its new partner in the mortgage market, while RBS is struggling with its expensive merger with ABN-AMRO. The UK government injects £37bn to stabilise both banks.


16 December 2008: FED CUTS KEY RATE TO NEAR ZERO

The US central bank cuts its interest rate to 0 - 0.25% in an attempt to stem the deepening recession, and begins to consider a programme of quantitative easing to throw money into the economy to help make borrowing easier. It is the lowest interest in the history of the Fed.


14 February 2009: US CONGRESS PASSES $787BN STIMULUS

President Obama wins his first major victory in Congress as it passes a huge economic recovery plan aimed at preventing the US falling into recession as a result of the credit crunch. Much of the money will go to the states to prevent them laying off public sector workers, but some will be invested in infrastructure projects like roads, schools and green energy.


2 April 2009: G20 SUMMIT IN LONDON

World leaders pledge an additional $1.1 trillion to help emerging market countries and promise coordinated action to fight the slump and improve regulation. Gordon Brown emerges triumphant from a global summit, which he claims is a turning point in the crisis, and stock markets begin to revive. However, not all the money pledged is actually delivered.


22 April 2009: UK BUDGET REVEALS HUGE DEFICIT

The UK Chancellor Alistair Darling reveals that the credit crunch will lead to the largest budget deficit in UK financial history of £175bn, with total government debt set to double to £1 trillion by 2014. Mr Darling admits it will take two Parliaments, or 10 years to get the budget back to the position it was in before the credit crunch.



Well, what did you do with your portfolio of stocks during each of the above periods?

Lessons drawn from this crisis:

1. The recession was rather a long one. The start was when HSBC first announced the problems with US subprime loans in February 2007. However, the severity of the crisis was uncertain in the beginning. Our local Tan Teng Boo dismissed the subprime as of insignificant size to dent the financial market. However, he failed to predict the subsequent events. Those who took his advice endured the pain of the forthcoming severe downturn.

2. The crisis was better explained by reading financial articles of the US, UK, Australia and other countries. Those reading the local press were unlikely to get the whole big picture of the financial problems that subsequently unfolded. Reading widely gave a more balanced views. However, faced with uncertainties, there were conflicting views given by many "experts".

3. The local gneral election of March 08 did not affect the local market much despite the BN losing 5 states. Presumably, the economic and political risks were already factored in the index then.

4. The Lehman crisis brought a precipitous fall in the market. Those who panicked and sold after the fall would have fallen to the folly of the market - buying high and selling low - being driven by fear in a falling market. The better approach then would be to do nothing. So many a time, so much losses came about because one has to do something, when one would have been better to just do nothing. The braver and smarter ones actually bought into the market, though on hindsight, this was still 6 months too early.

5. It is difficult to time the market. It is better to be approximately right than to be exactly wrong. Warren Buffett was right when he asked people to buy in October 2008. To do likewise, one has to be wired appropriately - this is certainly possible through a deeper understanding of the market, the stocks and behavioural finance.

6. Buy and hold is a safe strategy for selected stocks.

7. The market is cyclical. After a downturn of 20% or more, the ghost of the 1929 prolonged Great Recession was resurrected causing fear to investors. This occured also in previous downturns. Just as the market cannot rise forever relentless, similarly, it cannot fall forever unabated. After a severe prolonged downturn, try to call the near-bottom if you can to pick up the underpriced valued stocks. Similarly, in a prolonged bull market, try to call the near-top to cash out of some of the overpriced stocks.

How much longer will the rally last? All good things have to come to an end.

How much longer will the rally last?
At the end of each month, BBC World News business presenter Jamie Robertson takes a look at the world's major stock markets. This month he considers what will happen when the global rally comes to a halt.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The price of copper has almost doubled in the past year
A world where everything is going up in price and inflation is close to zero should be a happy and contented place.

It is not quite turning out that way.

Investors cannot put the idea out of their minds that all good things have to come to an end.

It is just no one yet can figure out how - or how messy an end it is going to be.

Huge gains

First, the good news.

Had you invested in a spread of Dow stocks a year ago you would have seen a 24% gain - despite the virtual wipe-out in the spring. The Nasdaq has seen a 51% gain, the FTSE 29%.

Bonds, treasuries as well as corporate bonds, have all shown healthy returns - even though they traditionally head in the opposite direction to stocks, benefiting from low growth scenarios. Copper is up almost 100%.

Early this year, metals prices started to lose touch with fundamentals

Andrew Cole, analyst
It seems everything investors have touched has turned to gold - which, I might add, is up over 70% on the year.

And that's without even mentioning some of the super-performers: the miners Fresnillo and Kazakhmys have risen - wait for it - 597% and 516% respectively.

Now these numbers have a somewhat narrow relevance in that November last year marked the low point for many commodity stocks, while the bulk of the global markets hit bottom in March.

Nevertheless, the point is we are riding a bull market goaded on by an indiscriminate, possibly blind and certainly irrational exuberance.

Commodity boom

The exuberance comes from cheap money.

As long as the liquidity remains the market will not fail, but we all know that at some point monetary policy will start to tighten and the stimulus packages will run out.

Then as fundamentals start to come back into play, which of the markets will turn out to have been an illusion?

The date of this turn-around seems to be around the middle to end of next year.

A number of economists are pointing to June or July for a raising of interest rates in the euro-zone, while the US is likely to wait until the end of the year.

However, markets are very good at pre-empting these things and they may well stumble several months before the actual moves are made.

Commodity prices are particularly sensitive to the Chinese economy that really lifted them out of their trough at the end of 2008, and the weakness of the dollar.

Investors moved money into commodities as a hedge against the dollar and a bet on recovery aided, if not led by China. But, again, it is the weight of money that has caused the rises.

So it is no accident that mining companies dominate the list of best performers on the FTSE 100 over the last year.

'Very shaky'

But Andrew Cole, metals analyst at Metal Bulletin, said: "Early this year, metals prices started to lose touch with fundamentals, which are still pretty poor.

"Outside of China, demand has still not picked up. There is a lot of risk and demand is very shaky. And there is no sign that stockpiles are coming down either.


Those who invested a year ago have had a good run

"But the truth is that investors are looking for places to put cash, and metals still look like a good bet," he added.

The trigger point for a commodity sell-off could be a strengthening of the dollar (or a corresponding weakening of the euro), especially if it happens in conjunction with a slowing of the Chinese stimulus package and a tightening of monetary policy, all of which are possible at varying points over the next 12 months.

The bond market is perhaps the most curious bull market of all, since it seems to be built on such a colossal supply of debt.

While the Dubai crisis rocked the sovereign debt markets - there was no real fear of a sovereign default as Dubai World is a state-owned company, not the state itself.

The real worries are closer to home in Greece, Ireland and Hungary.

UK concerns

Deutsche Bank believes Greece's public debt-to-GDP ratio could soon reach 135%. Meanwhile in the UK if the government doesn't get to grips with its debt in the next 12 months, the bull market in treasuries there may also come to an abrupt halt.

But, and here's the twist, if it does get to grips with it, such self-discipline could mean curtains for the equity bull market.

Howard Wheeldon, senior Strategist at BGC Partners, believes the US has a diverse and dynamic enough economy to continue its recovery.

But he paints a gloomy picture for the UK: "What will happen then to equities when they start slashing jobs in the public sector, when they start putting up taxes, ending the subsidies to things like car buying, and start doing all the things they have to do to bring the debt under control?

"Many of the equities in the UK have a cushion in that they have a great deal of exposure to the international economy, but the effect on the UK economy of all that austerity is going to be profound."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8393574.stm

Singapore’s rich optimistic on property prices, survey finds

Singapore’s rich optimistic on property prices, survey finds
Written by Bloomberg
Thursday, 03 December 2009 15:27
Share this


Singapore’s rich are among the most optimistic of global investors on real estate, expecting the value of their property holdings to rise in the next two years, according to a survey.

Fifty-three percent of Singapore investors forecast prices to increase, more than the 49% of respondents globally, the survey by Barclays Wealth and the Economist Intelligence Unit found. The survey of 2,000 people with investable assets of more than US$800,000 ($1.1 million) was taken in August and September.

Home prices in Singapore rose 15.8% in the third quarter, the first increase in more than a year, according to the Urban Redevelopment Authority. Transactions declined since peaking in July, and private home sales slowed for a third straight month in October, the authority said.

“While it can be tempting to seek refuge in property as a safe haven, investors must be careful to avoid overexposure to an asset class that has traditionally proven to be susceptible to economic cycles,” said Didier von Daeniken, chief executive of Barclays Wealth Asia Pacific, in a statement released today with the survey.

Singapore has said it will sell more land sites and ban interest-only mortgages for uncompleted homes as part of measures to prevent excessive price swings. Last month, its central bank said it may be “necessary” to implement more measures to counter real-estate market speculation.

Singapore investors said they plan to raise their property investments from the current average of 25% of their portfolio, the survey stated.

Investors from India and Canada were the most optimistic, according to the survey, with 56% and 55%, respectively, expecting price increases.

Basic Knowledge for International Investing

Evaluating Country Risk For International Investing
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/evaluating-country-risk-for.html

Malaysia's economy stagnant, needs reform
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/malaysias-economy-stagnant-needs-reform.html


Economics Basics: What Is Economics?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/economics-basics-what-is-economics.html

What is GDP and why is it so important?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-gdp-and-why-is-it-so-important.html

What Is The Balance Of Payments?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-balance-of-payments.html

Understanding The Current Account In The Balance Of Payments
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/understanding-current-account-in.html

Current Account Deficits: Government Investment Or Irresponsibility?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/current-account-deficits-government.html

What is a trade deficit and what effect will it have on the stock market?
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-trade-deficit-and-what-effect.html


What is RISK? Equity investment is the most risky investment in all the financial markets.
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-risk-equity-investment-is-most.html















Saturday 5 December 2009

Never Use P/E Ratios in Isolation

Different Types of P/E Ratios

It's important to understand that all P/E ratios are not created equally. Some are calculated using earnings from the past four quarters (known as a trailing P/E). Meanwhile, others use earnings from the last two quarters, plus projected earnings for the next two quarters (known as a current P/E). Finally, some are calculated based entirely on future earnings estimates (known as a forward P/E).

Caution must be used when examining forward P/E ratios, as future growth estimates may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Also, the underlying earnings used in the P/E calculation can vary from source to source. Some analysts, for example, choose to work with adjusted earnings figures, which exclude one-time gains or losses. Meanwhile, others prefer to use net income figures calculated based on traditional GAAP rules.

Never Use P/E Ratios in Isolation
Although a P/E ratio can provide a good approximation of how "expensive" a particular stock is relative to its underlying earnings stream, it is by no means a perfect gauge of a company's value. P/E ratios have a number of drawbacks, including:

-- Earnings Manipulation -- Companies often use a variety of accounting techniques to alter their reported net income. As a result, the reported earnings figures we read about are often not entirely representative of a company's true financial situation. Since net income is a critical component of a firm's P/E ratio, manipulated earnings can lead to misleading P/E data.

-- Industry Differences -- Different industries typically have different historical growth rates, risk levels, etc... and hence different average P/E ratios. Thus, stocks that may appear cheap in one industry may look expensive when stacked up against another. For this reason, it is typically more appropriate to compare a firm's P/E ratio to those of other companies within the same sector.

-- Other Factors -- It's important to remember that P/E ratios only take two items into account -- a firm's current stock price and its net income. As a result, P/E ratios completely ignore a variety of other important factors. One of the most notable of these factors is a firm's projected future growth rate. Two stocks could be identical in every respect (including on a P/E basis), but if one company is growing at twice the rate of the other firm, then the high-growth firm will likely make a better investment over the long haul. With this in mind, many investors prefer to examine PEG ratios as opposed to traditional P/E ratios.

-- Volatility and Risk -- P/E ratios also ignore such critical items as risk and volatility. Two firm's may sport identical P/E ratios, but if one firm's revenue and earnings base is extremely reliable, yet the other firm's earnings are highly uncertain, then the more reliable firm could make a better investment over the long haul.

With the above limitations in mind, when attempting to assess the value of a particular security, most experienced investors choose to analyze P/E ratios in conjunction with a variety of other ratios, including Price/Sales (P/S), Price/Cash Flow (P/CF), etc...



http://web.streetauthority.com/terms/p/pe-ratio.asp

The growth in stock returns came mostly from earnings growth

"The growth in stock returns came mostly from earnings growth," says Peng Chen, chief investment officer at Ibbotson Associates.

Company Valuation: NAV and DCF

Company Valuation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whenever people talk about equity investments, one must have come across the word "Valuation". In financial parlance, Valuation means how much a company is worth of. Talking about equity investments, one should have an understanding of valuation.

Valuation means the intrinsic worth of the company. There are various methods through which one can measure the intrinsic worth of a company. This section is aimed at providing a basic understanding of these methods of valuation. They are mentioned below:

Net Asset Value (NAV)

NAV or Book value is one of the most commonly used methods of valuation. As the name suggests, it is the net value of all the assets of the company. If you divide it by the number of outstanding shares, you get the NAV per share.

One way to calculate NAV is to divide the net worth of the company by the total number of oooutstanding shares. Say, a company’s share capital is Rs. 100 crores (10 crores shares of Rs. 10 each) and its reserves and surplus is another Rs. 100 crores. Net worth of the company would be Rs. 200 crores (equity and reserves) and NAV would be Rs. 20 per share (Rs. 200 crores divided by 10 crores outstanding shares).

NAV can also be calculated by adding all the assets and subtracting all the outside liabilities from them. This will again boil down to net worth only. One can use any of the two methods to find out NAV.

One can compare the NAV with the going market price while taking investment decisions.

Discounted Cash Flows Method (DCF)

DCF is the most widely used technique to value a company. It takes into consideration the cash flows arising to the company and also the time value of money. That’s why, it is so popular. What actually happens in this is, the cash flows are calculated for a particular period of time (the time period is fixed taking into consideration various factors). These cash flows are discounted to the present at the cost of capital of the company. These discounted cash flows are then divided by the total number of outstanding shares to get the intrinsic worth per share.

Role of Earnings in Investment decisions

 
Role of Earnings in Investment decisions

 
Once you have got an understanding of Income statement, you are ready to be your own analyst. Each quarter, companies release their earnings, and, for companies using the traditional calendar-year approach, the quarter ended on New Year's Eve. Earnings season is a great time to re-evaluate your current holdings to make sure the companies you own are living up to your expectations. But before earnings are even announced, you might want to review why you made the investment in the first place.

 
Whenever you buy a stock, write down in three or four sentences why you are doing so. State your reasons as objectively as you can. You might want to list such items as
  • revenue growth,
  • sustainability of earnings or growth over time,
  • increased market share,
  • increased gross margins,
  • price targets for the stock or
  • any other reasons you have for making the investment.

For example, you might write, "I am buying XYZ Corp. because I think earnings will grow at a rate of 20% per year and that the price/earnings multiple will increase from its current level of 16 to between 22 and 25."

 
By writing down your assumptions and your goals, you'll create a benchmark that can help you see over time how the company is performing. If you've never done this in the past, you might want to start now.

 
Now take a look at the earnings. The earnings per share (EPS) number is a good place to start. The EPS is the total net profit of the company divided by the number of shares of stock outstanding. But don't just look at the actual EPS and compare it to the expected EPS. Pull out your calculator and crunch some numbers.

 
First of all, has the number of shares outstanding changed significantly?
  • Has the company bought back a large chunk of its stock?
  • If so, earnings may have improved on a per-share basis, but may have stayed flat or even declined in real terms.
Next, you should be on the lookout for any one-time charges. You will want to remove the effect of the one-time charge, as it only creates noise and makes year-over-year comparisons more difficult.
  • Any one-time charge or gain will be stated in per-share amounts as a footnote. Just subtract it from the EPS if it is a gain, or add it back if it is a loss.
  • Once you have the EPS number exclusive of one-time items, you can compare it to the EPS from the same quarter last year to see how much growth has occurred.
  • Compare the growth figure of your company to others in the same industry.

 
Once you have gotten a good feel for the EPS, it's time to look at the actual numbers on the income statement. Here are some questions to ponder while you have your calculator in hand.
  • What does the growth rate in sales look like?
  • How was it last quarter?
  • Are gross margin percentages better or worse than they have been historically?
  • Are expenses increasing faster than sales?

 
Using your written benchmarks for the stock, create a couple of additional questions to help you compare the company's results with your own stated assumptions.

 

 
http://www.karvy.com/buysell/incomestatement.htm

What is RISK? Equity investment is the most risky investment in all the financial markets.

Risk Reward Ragas


Whenever we talk about investments, there is always some risk associated with all of them. Risk is the most dreaded word in all the financial markets across the globe. Any person, who is operating in the financial markets, in whatever capacity, has to face risk. So the question in most minds is, what exactly this RISK is? What does it mean?

In general terms, risk means any deviation from expectations. In Financial parlance, risk means any deviation from the expected returns. More specifically, the probability that the returns from any asset will differ from the expected yields is the risk inherent in that asset. We all face risk in our lives in one way or the other. So lets have an understanding of the risk

Risk inherent in equity investments

Equity investment is the most risky investment in all the financial markets. So one needs to have an understanding of risks associated with equity investments. Broadly, there are two types of risks associated with equity investments, viz., systematic risk and unsystematic risk. Lets have an understanding of these two types of risks.

Systematic risk: or the market risk, as it is called, this is the variation in the return on any scrip due to market movements. For example, suppose the Government announces a corporate tax cut or rise across the board, it is going to effect all the stocks in the market in the same way. This is the systematic risk of scrip, which exists because of market movements.

There is nothing much one can do about systematic risk of a security because it arises due to some extraneous variables. But there still exists some techniques, which help to hedge against the systematic risk of a security.

A good measure of an asset’s systematic risk is its Beta. Beta is calculated by regressing the returns of a particular asset on market returns. It can be interpreted as, say the beta of a stock is 1.25, then whenever the market moves by 1%, the stock will move by 1.25%.

Unsystematic risk: is the variation in the return of a scrip due to that scrip specific factors or movements. For example, say the Government announces tax sops to companies in a particular sector, it is going to effect the prices of the stocks of companies which are operating in that sector and not all the stocks.


Measuring risk

We can measure risk in two ways – Ex post and Ex ante risk measurement. Ex post measurement is done after the happening of an event and Ex ante measurement is done before the happening of an event.

Ex post Risk

When risk is measured ex post, it is measured as Variance from the mean value. That is, it is the statistical measure of Variance associated with the returns on a particular asset. For example, if one wants to measure risk associated with a particular stock, he will take the returns generated on the stock over a period of time and then he will find out the variance in the return of that particular stock. That variance will be the risk of that stock.

Ex ante Risk

When it is measured ex ante, it is measured as the probability that the returns from an asset will deviate from the mean or the expected returns. For this, if the variable has a normal distribution, the Theory of Normal distribution can be easily applied to find out the probability of this deviation. Otherwise subjective estimates of the probability have to be made.

For example, say the changes in a stock price have normal distribution. One can take the mean return based on the past return of the stock. Then, using the Standard Normal probability distribution, he can find out the probability of the return on that stock falling below that mean or expected return.

If the stock price is not normally distributed, then he will have to make subjective estimates of probabilities of getting a particular return. Using that, he can find out what is the expected return on that stock. Then the risk on that stock is the statistical measure of variance in return of that stock from the expected return.

Hedging risks associated with equity investments

Risk Hedging encapsulates all the activities required to ensure that the exposure, one is having, on account of the risk, doesn’t transform into loss. That is, the exposure is only a notional loss, which might transform into actual loss on happening of a particular event, but if necessary steps are taken to control, manage and diversify away the risk, this exposure can be controlled. All the activities undertaken to do so collectively comes under the purview of risk hedging.

In the following section, we present some of the commonly used techniques for managing risks:

Use of derivatives: Derivatives are most commonly used to hedge against the market risk. The use of the type of derivative instrument depends upon the expectations. An example will make the point clear. Say, you have 100 Reliance shares, the market price of which is presently RS. 300. Now you expect that the price of Reliance might go down in the future due to some reason. To hedge yourself against this risk, you can buy a Put option on Reliance’s stock and lock in a price. If the price actually falls, you can sell those shares at the price you contracted through Put option. If you expect prices to rise and you want to buy shares in the future, you can buy a Call option on Reliance’s stock.

To learn more about derivative basics, click here (a link to our derivative channel).

As of now, the use of derivatives on individual securities is not allowed in India. Sometime back, the use of any derivative instrument was not allowed in India. But now the SEBI has allowed the use of Index Futures on BSE and NSE. Soon, these Futures instruments will start trading on other exchanges also. And in due of course of time, the entire range of derivative instruments will be allowed in India.

Making a portfolio: To guard yourself against market risk, you can also make a portfolio of stocks whose returns are negatively correlated with each other. If you make a portfolio of two stocks whose correlation co-efficient is –1 (minus 1), then your market risk is minimized.


http://www.karvy.com/buysell/risk.htm

Basics of Company Valuation

Basics of Company Valuation

Andrew J. Sherman, Partner, Dickstein Shapiro Morin and Oshinsky LLP

Formal valuation of the seller's business is a vital component of the buyer's analysis when discussing a proposed acquisition. The valuation of a business in the context of an acquisition, as opposed to estate planning or other purposes, often involves consideration of "investment" or "strategic" value beyond a street analysis of fair market value. Valuation may be done by the seller prior to entertaining prospective buyers, by the buyer who identifies a specific target or by both parties during negotiations to resolve a dispute over price.

However, company valuation is not an exact science, nor will valuation issues typically drive the terms and pricing of the transaction. There are numerous acceptable valuation methods and, in most situations, each will yield a different result. In fact, the formal mathematical valuation should only play one part in the overall pricing of the deal and in determining the transaction's true value to the parties. While all methods should, in theory, yield the same result, they rarely do, because of factors including, but not limited to, market conditions, the industry in which the target company operates and the type and nature of the business.

All three main methods of valuation are open to debate and differences of opinion. The methods are useful in that they provide starting points and supply a range of reasonable values backed by various valid manners of justification. Even so, the value or price of a company is dependent on the particular time of the valuation and on the true motivations and goals of the key players involved in the transaction. Fair market value is commonly defined as the amount at which property would change hands between a willing seller and a willing buyer when neither is under compulsion and both have reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.

Challenges for a Smaller Company

For deals in the $1-million to $250-million range, these smaller, closely-held businesses will be more difficult to evaluate, because of certain "information risks" that can also result in lower valuations. These include:

•Lack of externally generated information, including analyst coverage, resulting in a lack of forecasts.
•Lack of adequate press coverage and other avenues to disseminate company- generated information.
•Lack of internal controls.
•Possible lack of internal reporting.


Smaller companies may also be more difficult to evaluate for firm-specific reasons, such as:

•Inability to obtain any financing or reasonably priced financing.
•Lack of product, industry, and geographic diversification.
•Inability to expand into new markets.
•Lack of management expertise.
•Higher sensitivity to macro- and microeconomic movements.
•Lack of dividend history.
•More sensitivity to business risks, supply squeezes, and demand lulls.
•Inability to control or influence regulatory and union activity.
•Lack of economies of scale or cost disadvantages.
•Lack of access to distribution channels.
•Lack of relationships with suppliers and customers.
•Lack of product differentiation or brand name recognition.
•Lack of deep pockets necessary for staying power.
Using a Professional Business Appraiser

To arrive at a valuation for the seller's company, self-evaluation or studying comparable companies and transactions may be used, but the means most widely accepted by both buyers and sellers considering a merger or acquisition is the use of a professional business appraiser. A professional appraiser can ensure that the starting point for negotiations is a valid one and that there is a strong and clear justification for the valuation. An appraiser is trained to look at a company and its assets, management, employees, financials, future projections, etc. as objectively as possible and turn this assessment into a range of values that are valid for the selling price of the company.

The target company will have to cooperate with the appraiser in order for the appraiser to arrive at a reasonable range of prices. Managers often feel threatened by the appraiser's detailed scrutiny of every aspect of the company's operations and management, but this access is important to the appraiser's ability to arrive at a fair valuation. An appraiser will probably request access to various offices and/or work sites run by the company, as well as approval to interview key personnel from both management and employee ranks. And, of course, the appraiser will ask to see complete financial records from recent years.

It is essential to define clearly the terms under which a professional business appraiser will be working when he or she is initially hired, in order to avoid problems down the road. First, the expected time frame for completion of the appraisal must be set forth in advance and must be reasonable. A proper appraisal takes a minimum of several weeks to complete. Also, be sure to clearly explain whether the finished product should be delivered as an oral or a written report.

Be careful to lay out exactly the amount of the appraiser's fee and when that fee will be paid. Beware of fee structures that could give rise to a conflict of interest. For example, a fee that is a percentage of the end value stated for the company, or payment only upon completion of the merger or acquisition transaction, gives the appraiser an apparent incentive to alter the value of the company to fit his or her best interests, and such appraisals may lack credibility as a negotiating tool.

Determining Strategic Value

In the context of a proposed acquisition, a veteran appraiser will create a strategic model of a proforma, showing what the seller's business would look like under the umbrella of the prospective buyer's company. The first step is to normalize current operating results to establish "net free cash flow." Next, the appraiser examines several "what-if" scenarios to determine how specific line items would change under various circumstances. This exercise allows the appraiser to identify a range of strategic values based on the projected earnings stream of the seller's company under its proposed new ownership. The higher this earnings stream, the higher the purchase price.

To arrive at this "strategic value," the appraiser obtains a great deal of financial data and general information on many aspects of the seller's business, such as the quality of management or the company's reputation in the marketplace. The appraiser must be alert throughout this process in order to capture bits of information that will be useful in the final determination of the company's strategic value. In addition, other elements are considered that may not be apparent without further probing. The appraiser attempts to assess how the value of the target company will be affected by any changes to the operations or foundation of the company as a result of the proposed transaction, such as a loss of key customers or key managers.

The professional business appraiser should also examine the seller's intangible assets when determining strategic value. The inventory of intangible assets includes such items as customer lists, intellectual property, patents, license and distributorship agreements, regulatory approvals, leasehold interests and employment contracts. Since certain intangibles may not be readily apparent, the more specifics the seller can supply, the more likely it is that they will enhance the valuation.

Finally, the appraiser conducts an analysis of the seller's financial procedures and accounting practices and evaluates the appropriateness and accuracy of these procedures. The appraiser also looks at the expected effect that credit ratings have on the company's value. The company's reputation in the business community, while difficult to define precisely, will affect its future value as well. And the appraiser may learn much about a company's potential from the management's own future plans and projections.

http://www.entrepreneurship.org/basics-of-company-valuation.html

Private Company Valuation

Private Company Valuation
Aswath Damodaran
 
Slides presentation
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/eqnotes/pvt.pdf

How To Value A Young Company

How To Value A Young Company
Martin Zwilling 09.23.09, 6:35 PM ET


Say you're lucky enough to find a willing investor in your young company. At some point (sooner rather than later), the guy will want to know: "How much do I have to pay for a slice of the pie--and how big a slice can I get?"

Placing a valuation on young companies is a tricky, subjective game, but it's one small-business owners have to know how to play, especially when investment capital remains stubbornly scarce. Quote too low a figure, and you'll give away the store; shoot too high, and the investor may blanch at your grasp of the underlying economics of the business.

Here are three techniques, some broken into parts, to help you put a value on your company. Your best bet is an amalgam of all of them. When it comes to impressing investors, the more ways you can speak their language, the better.

Technique No. 1: Asset Valuation

Of all valuation approaches, the asset approach--placing dollar values on all the assets on a company's balance sheet and adding them up--is the most concrete.

Start with physical assets, including machinery, office furniture, computers, inventory, prototypes (and the cost to develop them). Young companies tend not to have much in the way of physical assets, but add up what you do have.

Then move on to intellectual property. This includes patents, trademarks and even incorporation papers (because the company's name is protected). This approach may seem squishy, but the dollar amounts are real. A (rough) rule of thumb often used by investors is that each patent filed might justify $1 million increase in valuation.

Next up are all principals and employees. The value of most companies is in their people. In the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, it was not uncommon to see valuations rise by $1 million for every paid full-time programmer, engineer or designer. Don't forget to include the value of sweat equity--as in the theoretical salaries that would have been paid to founders and executives who didn't take them.

Also, don't forget the customer relationships. Every customer contract is worth something, even those still in negotiation. Assign probabilities to active customer sales efforts, just as sales managers do in quantifying their teams' forecasts. Particularly valuable are recurring revenues, like subscriptions, that don't have to be resold every period.

Technique No. 2: The Market Approach

Another way to look at valuation is by estimating a company's earning potential based on theoretical demand in the market.

Start by estimating the size and growth of your addressable market. The bigger the market, and the higher the growth projections (ginned up by independent analysts), the more your start-up is potentially worth. For a young, asset-light company looking to attract deep-pocketed investors, the target market should be at least $500 million in potential sales; if your business requires plenty of property, plants and equipment, the addressable market should be at least $1 billion.

Next, assess the competition and determine the barriers to entry. The stiffer the competition, the lower your valuation. On the flip side, the more fortified your company against new challengers (based on factors such as location, contracts with key customers, first-mover advantage, etc.), the more it's worth. These intangibles translate into what's known as goodwill--the amount a buyer might pay for your company above the value of the assets on your balance sheet. Goodwill can well bump up a valuation by a few million dollars.

Third, look at other similar companies that have managed to raise money--an exercise not unlike appraising the value of your house by comparing it to similar homes recently sold in your area. A thorough news search on Google might get you pretty far when looking for comparable deals. There are also professional valuation consultants who can pitch in--for a price, of course.

Technique No. 3: Income Valuation

The method, used extensively by financial analysts, involves projecting a company's future cash flows and discounting them, at some rate, to arrive at their value in present dollars. The discount rate applied to start-ups is typically steep--from 30% to 60%. The younger the company, and the greater the uncertainty of its future earning power, the larger the discount rate should be. (Note: In the case of very young, pre-revenue companies, this technique may not prove very useful.)

A variation on this approach involves tallying your company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA, to finance types) and multiplying that figure by some reasonable factor. Calculating typical EBITDA multiples for publicly traded companies in your industry is easy: Just take their market capitalizations (easily found online) and divide by EBITDA.

If running all these numbers sounds like a bit of work, well, that's true. But, then, would you rather give away the store?

Martin Zwilling is the founder and chief executive officer of Startup Professionals, a company that provides products and services to start-up founders and small-business owners. He can be reached at marty@startupprofessionals.com, and for his daily dose of practical advice, see blog.startupprofessionals.com.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/23/small-business-valuation-entrepreneurs-finance-zwilling.html

National Income Accounting

National Income Accounting

What Does National Income Accounting Mean?
A term used in economics to refer to the bookkeeping system that a national government uses to measure the level of the country's economic activity in a given time period. National income accounting records the level of activity in accounts such as total revenues earned by domestic corporations, wages paid to foreign and domestic workers, and the amount spent on sales and income taxes by corporations and individuals residing in the country.

Investopedia explains National Income Accounting
National income accounting provides economists and statisticians with detailed information that can be used to track the health of an economy and to forecast future growth and development. Although national income accounting is not an exact science, it provides useful insight into how well an economy is functioning, and where monies are being generated and spent.

Some of the metrics calculated by using national income accounting include gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP) and gross national income (GNI).

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/national_income_accounting.asp

How are a company's financial statements connected?

How are a company's financial statements connected?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


When you do research on different companies by looking at their annual reports, you will typically come across two separate financial statements: the balance sheet and the income statement (also known as the statement of profit and loss). These two statements are very significant for companies as they can be used to describe the company's health and effectiveness of management.

Balance Sheet - B/S
The balance sheet gives investors a general overview of a company's financial situation. That is, it tells investors exactly what a company owns (assets) and who it owes (liabilities).

Assets and liabilities are listed in order of liquidity (relative ease of convertibility to cash), from most liquid to least liquid. Assets appear on the left hand side of the balance sheet and liabilities on the right hand side. For simplicity's sake, think of a B/S as an indicator of net worth: that is, how much a company is worth "on the books."

Income Statement – I/S
The income statement tells investors about the company's profits and losses for a specific time period. Expenses are subtracted from income to determine a firm's profit or loss. Unlike the B/S, the I/S doesn't look at the company's financial health (total net worth). Instead, it looks at how much revenue a company is able to create. If you were to think of the B/S as an indicator of net worth, you can think of the I/S as a company's profitability: that is, how much it can make in a given time frame.

These two statements are intertwined and should be looked at by all people who are considering investing their hard earned money in a particular company. You should look at a company's B/S to see exactly how much it is worth (remember, this is a book value representation rather than market capitalization), and look at the I/S to see how profitable the company is. Obviously, if it has a negative net worth (its liabilities are greater than its assets) or if it has a negative income, then the company might not be the best place to invest your money.


http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/03/061603.asp

8 Ways To Help Family Members In Financial Trouble

8 Ways To Help Family Members In Financial Trouble

by Katie Adams

What do you do when a family member becomes unemployed? Or suffers an unexpected injury and can't work or has insufficient insurance to cover mounting medical bills? How do you respond when you learn a loved one can't pay their bills? Let's take a look at a few options you can consider to help your family members in trouble - without hurting yourself financially.

1. Give a cash gift.
If your loved one is having a short-term cash flow problem, you may want to give an outright financial gift. Decide how much you can afford to give, without putting yourself in financial jeopardy, and then either give the maximum amount you can afford all at once (and let your loved one know that's the case) or perhaps give smaller gifts on a periodic or regular basis until the situation is resolved. Make sure it's clearly understood that the money is a gift, not a loan to be repaid, so you don't create an awkward situation for the gift recipient. If you're considering giving them a substantial sum of money, you'll need to keep an eye on the annual gift exclusion set each year by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

2. Make a personal loan.
Your family member may approach you and ask for a short-term loan. Talk frankly, clearly write out the terms of the loan on paper, and have both parties sign it. This helps both parties be clear on the financial arrangement they're entering into. Some loan details you'll want to include are:

•the amount of the loan
•whether the loan will be one lump-sum payment, or if it will be divided and paid out in installments upon meeting certain conditions (i.e. securing another job, paying down existing debt, etc.)
•the interest rate you will charge for making the loan and how it will be calculated (i.e. compound or simple interest)
•payment due dates (including the date of full repayment or final installment due)
•a recourse if he or she doesn't make loan payments on time or in full (i.e. increasing interest charges, ceasing any further loan payments, taking legal action, etc.)

If you are going to lend more than $10,000 and/or you're going to charge an interest rate that is substantially different than the going rate for most borrowers, you may want to talk to a tax professional. There can be unique tax implications for low interest loans among family members.

If you're worried about potentially straining your relationship by having to administer the loan (i.e. collect payments or call when the payment is late), consider using a service, such as Prosper.com or VirginMoney.com. These companies can draw up the contracts and even collect automatic payments from your loved one's bank account. (To read more on this subject, see Outfox The Debt Collector's Hounds and Negotiating A Debt Settlement.)

3. Co-sign on a bank loan.
Your loved one may be interested in obtaining a loan or line of credit (LOC) to help with short-term financial needs but what if his or her credit requires getting a co-signer? Would you be willing to co-sign on a bank or credit union loan or LOC?

Before simply saying "yes" and essentially lending a family member your good credit, it's important to realize that there are legal and financial implications to co-signing on a loan. The most critical thing to understand is that you are legally binding yourself to repay the loan if the other borrower fails to do so. The lender can take legal action against you and require that you pay the full amount, even if you had an agreement between you and your family member that you would not have to make payments. This delinquent loan will also now affect your personal credit. So if your sister/brother/uncle fails to make payments on the loan on time and in full the lender can report the negative account activity to the credit bureaus to file on your credit report which, in turn, can lower your credit score. (Keep reading about debt and credit in The Importance Of Your Credit Rating, Debt Consolidation Made Easy and Expert Tips For Cutting Credit Card Debt.)

Co-signing a loan is serious business. The fact that your family members need a loan co-signer means that the lender considers them too great of a risk for the bank to take alone. If the bank isn't sure they'll repay the loan, what guarantees do you have that they will? It may also mean that you could have more difficulty getting a loan for yourself down the road, since you are technically taking on this loan and its payment as well.

Before co-signing for a loan, make sure you:

•Ask for a copy of your family member's credit report, credit score, and monthly budget so you'll have an accurate picture of his or her finances and ability to repay the loan.
•Meet with the lender in person (if possible) and be sure that you understand all the terms of the loan.
•Get copies of all documents related to the loan including the repayment schedule.
•Ask the lender to notify you in writing if your family member misses a payment or makes a late payment.

Finding out about potential repayment problems sooner rather than later can help you take quick action and protect your own credit score.

4. Create a budget and help create a bill-paying system.
Often, people in a financial crisis simply aren't aware where their money is going. If you have experience using a budget to manage your own money, you may be able to help your family in creating and using a budget as well. To break the ice you may want to offer to show them your budget and your bill-paying system and explain to them how it helps you make financial decisions. As you work together to help them get a handle on their financial situation, the process will point out places where they can cut back on expenses or try to increase their income to better meet their financial obligations. (To learn more, read Expert Tips For Cutting Credit Card Debt and A Guide To Debt Settlement.)

5. Provide employment.
If you're not comfortable making a loan or giving a cash gift, consider hiring your family member to assist with needed tasks at an agreed-upon rate. This side job may go a long way towards helping them earn the money they need to pay their bills, and help you finish up any jobs that you've been putting off. Treat the arrangement like you would any other employee - spell out clearly the work that needs to be done, the deadlines and the rate of pay. Be sure to include a provision about how you'll deal with poor or incomplete work.

6. Give non-cash financial assistance.
If you're uncomfortable or unwilling to give your family member cash, consider giving non-cash financial assistance, such as gift cards or gift certificates. You'll have more control over what your money will be used for and you can easily buy gift cards in varying amounts at most stores.

7. Prepay bills.
You may want to consider prepaying one or more regular bills your loved one receives (i.e. rent/mortgage, utility bills, insurance premiums, etc.) to help them during their current financial crunch. Offering to do something, such as paying their car payment may help them avoid a short-term crisis and give them the little extra time they need to work out of their situation.

8. Help them find professional assistance and local resources.
You simply may not wish or be able to provide your family member with financial assistance or hands-on help. But you can still play a key role by helping them find local professionals that can steer them in the right direction, such as:

•Career counselor and employment agencies
•Welfare agencies and similar services
•Credit and debt counselors
•Lenders who can provide short-term solutions


Conclusion
As always, the most important step is sitting down with your loved one and asking specifically what help they need to work their way out of their current situation. From there you'll have a better idea of the type of information and assistance they need. For example, if they need to make more money you could help them look for jobs and update their resume. If they need help repaying credit card debt, you could call local credit counseling agencies to learn what services they offer, how much it costs and how it could benefit your family member.

Family members and money aren't always a good mix. But, in tough economic times or when faced with unexpected emergencies, your loved ones may truly need your financial assistance. Before you commit to helping, be sure to think through what you can and can't afford to do. Remember, if your own resources are limited, there are meaningful, effective, and creative ways to help your family member(s).

Some debt just seems to keep coming back, to learn how to stop it read Dawn Of The Zombie Debt.





by Katie Adams, (Contact Author | Biography)

Katie Adams is a freelance commercial writer, marketing and public relations professional with 18 years experience. She has written extensively about financial issues and was previously Director of Regional Communications for Fannie Mae. Adams earned a B.A. from the College of William and Mary and lives with her family in Virginia Beach, Virginia. She is actively involved in international philanthropic work to improve orphan care and accelerate sustainable development in Central America. Visit her website at www.katieadams.homestead.com.

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/09/help-family-members-trouble.asp

Increase Your Disposable Income

Increase Your Disposable Income

by Andrew Beattie


Although it is not the only factor in deciding how wealthy an individual is, disposable income does have a significant influence. If you have little or no money after taxes and expenses, then it is hard to save and invest for the future. In this article, we'll look at four ways you can increase your disposable income.

1. Get a Raise - or a Second Job
There is no shortage of books and articles that give advice about getting more money out of your employer. They provide counsel on everything from dressing well to taking a pay cut in exchange for performance bonuses. One of the most highly touted techniques is to go for further training or education. This can cost you money now, but it will hopefully translate into higher wages and a more secure position in the company. (To read more, see Invest In Yourself With A College Education.)

Regardless of how you go about it, getting a raise is the most obvious way to increase your income. Along the same lines is the possibility of having another job on the side. Working two jobs in tandem can be physically and mentally draining, but it will bring more money in when you need it.

The problem with increasing your income through your job is that you expose yourself to increased income taxes. The tax loss resulting from entering a higher income bracket is not prohibitive, but it is discouraging. You are working harder and often longer hours, but the returns on your effort are diminishing as your income tax rate increases. Basically, you have to work harder just to add a little more to your pocket. This is compounded by the fact that most people never see the extra wages because their lifestyles adjust to absorb it. For example, you may notice that your taxes have increased so, in order to minimize your tax bill, you decide to move into a bigger house to get more of a homeowner's deduction on the mortgage. Although you can technically afford it, the larger mortgage payment leaves you with the same disposable income as before.

2. Start a Business
Starting a business, even a small one, is a legitimate way to bolster your income. Much like a raise or second job, running a business will put more demands on your time and require more effort. The difference is that you will see more of the income from your labor because taxation for business owners is a small pinch when compared to the slap that the IRS gives to employees. Some of your business write-offs can even be claimed against other income sources, but you have to follow the rules carefully. (To find out more about this subject, see Tax Credit For Plan Expenses Incurred By Small Businesses, Plans The Small-Business Owner Can Establish and Capital Gains Tax Cuts For Middle Income Investors.)

The major drawback of starting a business is that there is no guarantee of success or income like there is with a raise or a second job. Starting a business takes a certain type of person, one with the motivation and the ability to handle the details involved in implementing an idea. The time, effort and nerves that it takes to run a business (that has no certainty of success) means that very few people will take this route.

3. Investing Income
Investing income is considered a form of passive income. This is a misnomer because it does take active effort to create income from investing - you have to research investments, build and maintain your portfolio, etc. - but it is generally considered to take less effort than, let's say, shoveling concrete day in and day out. Investing income can come from stocks, bonds, real estate, or many other forms. The common theme is that they ideally produce a return on the money you put into them. (To find out more, see Investing With A Purpose and A Guide To Portfolio Construction.)

Creating income through investing is a process of accumulation. Even if you consistently get a return on investments (ROI) of 20%, if you only have $1,000 in the investment, you will add a little less than $200 to your yearly income after any fees and taxes have been paid (and there is no guarantee of consistent returns of even 10%). Searching for stocks with a history of dividends, sometimes called income stocks, can help create some income now, but it will still not be as rapid in results as a second job. As you put more money in, however, more money comes out in the form of returns. Investing is a great way to increase your disposable income in the long run, but it won't do wonders for your immediate situation unless you have a huge chunk of capital just sitting around. Investing takes patience, time and discipline (it is also subject to taxation). That said, it is one of the surest ways to gradually add to your disposable income without exerting yourself too much.

4. Spend Less
The best way to increase your disposable income is to protect the money you earn by spending less. Tightening your budget will take some effort in the form of sacrificing a few luxuries, but the increase to your disposable income will not require longer hours or incur any extra tax. The more after-tax dollars you hold onto, the easier it is to do things like investing to secure more income in the future.

You don't have to scour the classifieds or create a business model or subscribe to a bunch of financial magazines, you just have to spend less than you are currently making. Earning more may help you, but spending less is the only iron-clad solution to the problem of living paycheck to paycheck and never having enough. (Keep reading about this subject in The Indiana Jones Guide To Getting Ahead, Downsize Your Home To Downsize Expenses and Enjoy Life Now And Still Save For Later.)

Conclusion
Of all the ways to increase your disposable income, the simplest one is by far the best. Spending less and saving more can be used in conjunction with any of the other strategies as well as being the only one that isn't going to affect your taxes or require more of your time. In the words of Benjamin Franklin, "If you know how to spend less than you get, then you have the philosopher's stone."

To read more, see Three Simple Steps To Building Wealth, Starting Early With Financial Planning and Understanding The Time Value Of Money.
by Andrew Beattie, (Contact Author | Biography)

Andrew Beattie is a freelance writer and self-educated investor. He worked for Investopedia as an editor and staff writer before moving to Japan in 2003. Andrew still lives in Japan with his wife, Rie. Since leaving Investopedia, he has continued to study and write about the financial world's tics and charms. Although his interests have been necessarily broad while learning and writing at the same time, perennial favorites include economic history, index funds, Warren Buffett and personal finance. He may also be the only financial writer who can claim to have read "The Encyclopedia of Business and Finance" cover to cover.

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/07/disposable_income.asp?viewed=1

How much life insurance should I have?

How much life insurance should I have?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The main purpose of life insurance is to provide the same standard of living for your family and cover your financial responsibilities in the event of your death.


The two most common methods for determining insurance needs are the following:


Rule of Thumb Method - Most commonly used, and easy to calculate. Simply calculate your annual income and multiply this figure by five- to 10-times your annual income. It's a quick method, but not the most precise nor situation-specific.

Actual Needs Method - Here you'll need to compute all of your debts, expenses and inflows in a similar budget and balance sheet format. Once you've done this, you'll want to make sure that you obtain enough insurance to payoff all of the debts (current and future-college for the kids), next you'll want to add a yearly expense cushion (maybe cover five- to 10-years of expenses). When you have these figures, add them together and this is how much insurance you should obtain.

Standard of Living Method - Determine the amount of money the survivors would need to maintain their standard of living if the insured person died. Multiply that amount by 20. The thought process here is that the survivors can take a 5% withdrawal from the death benefit each year (which is equivalent to the standard of living amount) where at the same time the survivors should be able to invest the death benefit principal and earn 5% or better. (For more, see What To Expect When Applying For Life Insurance.)


(This question was answered by Steven Merkel.)

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/how-much-life-insurance.asp

5 Costs Of Financial Procrastination

5 Costs Of Financial Procrastination

 
by Investopedia Staff, (Investopedia.com)

 

 
As long-time procrastinators will attest, this deferral of something that needs to be done is rarely an isolated instance, and it usually occurs habitually and for trivial reasons.

 
Procrastination can have a number of undesirable consequences, such as
  • missed deadlines,
  • wasted opportunities and
  • sub-standard work as a result of insufficient time.
The costs of procrastination, while substantial, are not easy to quantify.

 
But what can be quantified – at least to some extent – are the costs associated with putting off decisions and actions when it comes to personal finances and investments. Beware of such "financial procrastination," because the price tag of needless delay in this crucial area can be steep.

 
Five Costs of Financial Procrastination
Broadly speaking, we can classify the costs of financial procrastination in five main areas: 
  • Delays in investing
  • Putting off routine investment decisions
  • Tardiness in organizing personal finances
  • Late filing of taxes
  • Procrastinating on major financial decisions

 

 
1. Investing Delays
Delays in putting your money to work through investments can eventually end up costing you a lot.

Consider the case of two hypothetical investors, Ms. A. Lacrity and Mr. D. Lay, who begin investing $2,000 annually at ages 30 and 40 respectively in a tax-deferred account such as an individual retirement account (IRA).
  • Let's assume that the long-term average annual rate of return earned by both investors on their investments is 5%.
  • By the time they turn 60, A. Lacrity's IRA would have grown to about $132,878, twice the size of D. Lay's IRA, as Table 1 shows.

 
Annual Rate of Return
5.00%
5.00%

 
Period (years)
30
20

 
Annual Investment
$2,000
$2,000

 
Total Investment (I)
$60,000
$40,000

 
Total Value (V)
$132,878
$66,132

 
Growth (V – I)
$72,878
$26,132

 
Cost Of Procrastination
$26,746

 

 
Of course, the fact that A. Lacrity invested an additional $20,000 over 10 years accounts for part of the difference in the two portfolios.
  • But a substantial part of the difference – or $26,746 – can also be attributed to the compounding effect of the $20,000 for the additional 10 years that A. Lacrity has been investing.
  • Another way of looking at this from D. Lay's viewpoint is that this $26,746 in incremental growth represents his "cost of procrastination" for the 10-year period (recall that he commenced investing at age 40, rather than at 30). (Learn more in Accelerating Returns With Continuous Compounding.)

 
Two points need to be noted here:

 
•The higher the rate of return, the higher the cost of procrastination – According to Ibbotson Associates, the compound annualized return for the S&P 500 for the 30-year period from July 1979 to July 2009 was 10.75%; for the 20-year period from July 1989 to July 2009, it was 7.76%. Long-term government bonds returned 9.46% annually for the 30-year period beginning July 1979, and 8.55% for the 20-year period commencing July 1989.

 
•If we therefore assume an 8% annual rate of return in the previous example instead of 5%, the cost of procrastination rises dramatically. As can be seen in Table 2, this cost increases to over $95,000.
Annual Rate of Return
8.00%
8.00%

 
Period (years)
30
20

 
Annual Investment
$2,000
$2,000

 
Total Investment
$60,000
$40,000

 
Total Value
$226,566
$91,524

 
Growth
$166,566
$51,524

 
Cost of Procrastination

 
$95,042

 

 
2. Putting Off Investment Decisions
Putting off investment decisions until the market "improves," or consciously delaying investing in a bid to "time the market," can also cost thousands of dollars over the long term. Many professionals view market timing as an exercise in futility, primarily because missing the market's best days can erode returns significantly.

 
One study shows that $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 on January 1, 1980, would have grown to $121,029 on June 30, 2008. But if the investment missed just the 10 best-performing days for the index over this period, it would have only grown to $70,745 or about 42% lower.

 
Another study shows that $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 for a 30-year period from January 1, 1979 would have grown to about $229,000 by December 31, 2008, or an 11.0% annual rate of return. Missing the best 20 months over this timeframe would erode the value of the investment to approximately $42,000, or 4.9% annually.

 
An investor who invested $100,000 in the S&P 500 at the beginning of March 2009 would have obtained total returns (including dividends) of 51% by mid-November of that year. Had that investor procrastinated for a couple of months and invested at the beginning of May, total returns by mid-November 2009 would have shrunk by half, to about 26%. The cost of procrastination in this case would be 25%, or $25,000 on a $100,000 portfolio.

 
The best way to avoid missing out on days when financial markets are on a red-hot streak is to ensure that you stay fully invested in it. In case you are concerned about investing "at the top," one solution would be to make periodic investments through an automatic plan rather than through a lump sum. (To learn more, read Dollar Cost Averaging Pays.)

 
3. Tardiness in Organizing Personal Finances
Getting your financial house in order is a vital area that may tend to get overlooked in the hustle and bustle of daily life. In some cases, this tardiness may have a direct opportunity cost - for example,
  • a $50 gift card that you delayed using for two or three years until it was well past expiry.
  • In other cases, procrastination may have a relatively minor effect at first, but may have a cascading impact that gets magnified over time.

 
For example, tardiness in depositing checks may lead to an overdrawn account, while putting off paying bills may lead to missed due dates. While financial penalties in the form of overdraft fees, late charges and interest costs are an inevitable consequence of such procrastination, the bigger impact may arise from negative revisions to one's credit profile and credit score. (For more, check out 5 Keys To Unlocking A Better Credit Score.)

 
A couple of minor bills that you never got around to paying can eventually end up as a red flag on your credit report. Lenders who view your credit report may then view you as a higher-risk borrower, and charge you a higher interest rate to compensate for this perceived greater risk. This can result in thousands of dollars in higher interest costs for big-ticket items such as a house or a car, a steep price to pay for procrastinating on a couple of bill payments.

 
4. Late Filing of Taxes
Since the tendency to procrastinate is directly proportional to the unpleasantness of the task, it is not surprising to note the large number of people who miss the deadline for filing their tax returns every year. By that token, April 15 must probably rank as one of the most dreaded dates for procrastinators in the U.S. But it makes sense to file taxes by the due date, because penalties and interest can make late filing an expensive proposition.

 
The IRS charges a monthly penalty of 5% of the tax payable for failure to file income tax returns by their due date, up to a maximum penalty of 25%. So if you were unable to get your paperwork together in time to meet the tax filing deadline, and ended up filing six months late with a tax balance payable of $5,000, your failure-to-file penalty (excluding interest) would be $1,250. Your total cost of procrastination in this case would be $1,250 plus any interest or other penalties assessed by the IRS. That should be sufficient inducement to avoid procrastinating on your taxes in future years. (For more, check out Next Season, File Taxes On Your Own.)

 
5. Procrastinating on Major Financial Decisions
While the preceding cases can cost in the thousands, procrastinating on major financial decisions can ultimately cost you the most.

 
For most people, the necessity to make major financial decisions – the ones that involve relatively large sums of money – tends to coincide with personal milestones such as buying a residential property or saving up for retirement. It is highly advisable in such cases to begin learning at the earliest opportunity about the finer details of the upcoming financial milestone and the factors that need to be considered in making a decision concerning it. As an example, when buying a residential property, the prospective buyer needs to evaluate numerous factors, including:
  • the mortgage amount that can be comfortably serviced,
  • arranging for the down payment,
  • deciding on whether to opt for a fixed-rate or adjustable-rate mortgage,
  • deciding how much to bid for a desirable property etc.
(To learn more, see Get Personal With Your Portfolio.)

 
Procrastinating on major financial decisions may lead to a number of pitfalls such as:

 
•Making hasty decisions without adequate research
•Having insufficient time to read and analyze the "fine print" in contracts
•Not having adequate insurance coverage or assets in times of need

Buying an overpriced condo without assessing its investment merits; being unaware that one's adjustable-rate mortgage will reset to an interest rate that is twice the teaser rate; being struck down with a debilitating illness when one does not have long-term disability insurance. These are all examples of unfortunate financial situations that can wipe out a massive chunk of one's bank balance and net worth. However, doing one's homework and taking prompt action can help avert or at least mitigate these losses. (For more, see Are You Living Too Close To The Edge?)

 
Conclusion

Time is indeed money when decisions have to be made and actions taken with regard to your personal finances and investments. In this regard, prompt action needs to replace financial procrastination, since the costs associated with the latter can be very steep.

 

 
by Investopedia Staff, (Contact Author | Biography)

 
Investopedia.com believes that individuals can excel at managing their financial affairs. As such, we strive to provide free educational content and tools to empower individual investors, including thousands of original and objective articles and tutorials on a wide variety of financial topics.

 
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/09/costs-of-financial-procrastination.asp?viewed=1

What do people mean when they say debt is a relatively cheaper form of finance than equity?

What do people mean when they say debt is a relatively cheaper form of finance than equity?

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this case, the "cost" being referred to is the measurable cost of obtaining capital.
  • With debt, this is the interest expense a company pays on its debt.
  • With equity, the cost of capital refers to the claim on earnings which must be afforded to shareholders for their ownership stake in the business.

 
For example, if you run a small business and need $40,000 of financing, you can either take out a $40,000 bank loan at a 10% interest rate or you can sell a 25% stake in your business to your neighbor for $40,000.

 
  • Suppose your business earns $20,000 profits during the next year. If you took the bank loan, your interest expense (cost of debt financing) would be $4,000, leaving you with $16,000 in profit.
  • Conversely, had you used equity financing, you would have zero debt (and thus no interest expense), but would keep only 75% of your profit (the other 25% being owned by your neighbor). Thus, your personal profit would only be $15,000 (75% x $20,000).
  • From this example, you can see how it is less expensive for you, as the original shareholder of your company, to issue debt as opposed to equity.
  • Taxes make the situation even better if you had debt, since interest expense is deducted from earnings before income taxes are levied, thus acting as a tax shield (although we have ignored taxes in this example for the sake of simplicity).

 
Of course, the advantage of the fixed-interest nature of debt can also be a disadvantage, as it presents a fixed expense, thus increasing a company's risk.
  • Going back to our example, suppose your company only earned $5,000 during the next year.
  • With debt financing, you would still have the same $4,000 of interest to pay, so you would be left with only $1,000 of profit ($5,000 - $4,000).
  • With equity, you again have no interest expense, but only keep 75% of your profits, thus leaving you with $3,750 of profits (75% x $5,000).
  • So, as you can see, provided a company is expected to perform well, debt financing can usually be obtained at a lower effective cost.
  • However, if a company fails to generate enough cash, the fixed-cost nature of debt can prove too burdensome. This basic idea represents the risk associated with debt financing.

 
Companies are never 100% certain what their earnings will amount to in the future (although they can make reasonable estimates), and the more uncertain their future earnings, the more risk presented.
  • Thus, companies in very stable industries with consistent cash flows generally make heavier use of debt than companies in risky industries or companies who are very small and just beginning operations.
  • New businesses with high uncertainty may have a difficult time obtaining debt financing, and thus finance their operations largely through equity.

 
(For more on the costs of capital, see Investors Need A Good WACC.)

 
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/debtcheaperthanequity.asp

What is GDP and why is it so important?

 
What is GDP and why is it so important?

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 
The gross domestic product (GDP) is one the primary indicators used to gauge the health of a country's economy.
  • It represents the total dollar value of all goods and services produced over a specific time period - you can think of it as the size of the economy.
  • Usually, GDP is expressed as a comparison to the previous quarter or year.
  • For example, if the year-to-year GDP is up 3%, this is thought to mean that the economy has grown by 3% over the last year.

 
Measuring GDP is complicated (which is why we leave it to the economists), but at its most basic, the calculation can be done in one of two ways:
  • either by adding up what everyone earned in a year (income approach), or
  • by adding up what everyone spent (expenditure method).
Logically, both measures should arrive at roughly the same total.

 
The income approach, which is sometimes referred to as GDP(I), is calculated by adding up total compensation to employees, gross profits for incorporated and non incorporated firms, and taxes less any subsidies.

The expenditure method is the more common approach and is calculated by adding total consumption, investment, government spending and net exports.

 
As one can imagine, economic production and growth, what GDP represents, has a large impact on nearly everyone within that economy.
  • For example, when the economy is healthy, you will typically see low unemployment and wage increases as businesses demand labor to meet the growing economy.
  • A significant change in GDP, whether up or down, usually has a significant effect on the stock market.
  • It's not hard to understand why: a bad economy usually means lower profits for companies, which in turn means lower stock prices.
  • Investors really worry about negative GDP growth, which is one of the factors economists use to determine whether an economy is in a recession.

 
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/199.asp