Friday 14 May 2010

Investor's Checklist: Telecom Sector

The telecommunication sector is filled with the kinds of companies we love to hate:
  • They earn mediocre (and declining) returns on capital, 
  • economic moats are nonexistent or deteriorating, 
  • their future depends on the whims of regulators, and 
  • they constantly spend boatloads of money just to stay in place.  
Even companies that once boasted wide moats, such as those that control the local phone network, face increasing competition from newer players, such as cable and wireless networks.  Because telecom is fraught with risk, we typically look for a large margin of safety before considering any telecom stock.

Telecom Economics

Building and maintaining a telecom network, whether fixed line or wireless, is an extremely expensive endeavor that requires truckloads of upfront capital.  This requirement provides a substantial barrier to entry and usually protects the established players.  To raise capital, a new entrant must have a great story to tell investors.  The emergence of the Internet, the opening of local networks to competition, and rapid wireless growth during the 1990s gave numerous new players the yarns they needed, which is why the usual barrier provided by huge capital requirements came crumbling down as investors lined up to grab a piece of the action.

While the effects of this massive infusion of capital are still being felt in the industry, ongoing capital needs have sunk many new entrants.  Even a mature telecom firm will need to invest significant capital to maintain its network, meet changing customer demands, and respond to competitive pressures.

Because of the enormous cost to build a network, carriers typically have very low ratios of sales to assets (asset turnover ratios).  Even a mature carrier typically generates only around $1 per year in sales for each $1 of assets invested.  But building a business of ample size to support interest payments and ongoing capital needs is very important.  Because fixed costs are so high, it's imperative for carriers to have enough customers over which to spread the costs.

Squeezing as much profit from the sale as possible is also crucial.  While size again plays a role here, a telecom company must be able to send bills, provide customer service, maintain the network, and market services efficiently.  A mature company, either fixed line or wireless, should expect to earn operating margins between 20 percent and 30 percent.  Short of this level, it is extremely difficult to earn an attractive return on invested capital, given the slow pace at which assets turn over.

With so many companies raising money and building networks in the late 1990s, the volume of business needed to support all these huge investments never materialised.

Conclusion:

The telecom sector of tomorrow will look nothing like the sector of the past.  Competition is far greater throughout the industry and economic moats exceedingly difficult to come by.  The future of the industry will be shaped by regulatory and technological changes, which means that financial strength and flexibility are likely to be what separate successful firms from unsuccessful ones over the next few years.

Investor's Checklist:  Telecom
  • Shifting regulations and new technologies have made the telecom industry far more competitive.  Though some areas are more stable than others, look for a wide margin of safety to any estimate of value before investing.
  • Telecom is a capital-intensive business.  Having the resources to maintain and improve the network is critical to success.
  • Telecom is high fixed-cost business.  Keeping an eye on margins is very important.
  • Watching debt is also important.  Firms can easily overextend themselves as they build networks.
  • The price of wireless airtime is plummeting. Carriers continue to compete primarily on price.


The Five Rules for Successful Stock Investing
by Pat Dorsey

A quick look at Green Packet (14.5.2010)



A quick look at Green Packet (14.5.2010)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tV-54uu4_jzVGfNlURI6rhg&output=html

Business Prospects (Extracted from its Quarterly Report)
The Group's main revenue contributor, the broadband and voice business segment is projected to be competitive even with all the major service providers challenging for better market share by way of intensive awareness events and aggressive marketing campaigns. The broadband market in Malaysia is however projected to see further strong growth in demand over the next few years. The Group projects to achieve better market traction with focus on improving service quality. The Group also expects improvement in the software and application business in line with the growth of more WiMAX Networks globally. Accordingly, the Board expects the performance of the Group to improve for the financial year ending 31 December 2010.

Financial Crisis, Round II: Is it coming soon?

Financial Crisis, Round II: Is it coming soon?
March 26, 2010

Several successful entrepreneurs have recently told me they're keeping their investments locked up in cash, fearful the financial crisis is set to return very soon, only this time it'll be worse. Much worse. And with banking reform in the US almost non-existent and countries like Greece keeping the world on edge, they might be right. So, I asked seven financial thinkers for their forecasts.

Harry S. Dent, Jr. is the author of The Great Depression Ahead. He believes the US government's debt of $12 trillion is just the tip of the iceberg. When private debt and unfunded liabilities are added, "the total US debt is more like $102 trillion or seven times GDP, more than triple that at the top of the Roaring 20s which led to the Great Depression." He's expecting stocks to crash sometime between July and September - only this time China will not be immune. He's convinced it'll "collapse when the Western world falls again," and predicts a global depression that will last well into 2012.

Investment expert, Noel Whittaker, is optimistic. He told me he's spent 50 years in the finance industry, "and there wasn't once in that period that some 'guru' wasn't forecasting financial Armageddon. Obviously, there is concern about the level of debt around the world but the economies of many countries are starting to pick up and the private sector is taking over the spending that was done by governments as part of their stimulus packages. Furthermore, the rise of the Asian countries is continuing and will continue to do so."

But Canadian economic commentator, Sheldon Filger, disagrees. He predicted the global financial crisis two years before it occurred. "Policymakers in major advanced economies have made a gamble; absorbing massive levels of public debt to backstop insolvent banks and fund stimulus spending... They will lose this gamble, I am convinced, sparking a massive sovereign debt crisis in these economies, especially the US and UK, unleashing a synchronised global depression. What is unfolding now in Greece and the other PIIGS is but a harbinger of what is to come. I predict that round two will unfold by 2012."

Phil Ruthven is an economic forecaster and Chairman of IBISWorld. He's not really worried. "There's no doubt there's a second dip coming, but not a second crisis. Governments around the world have pumped $9 trillion into the finance system. That's roughly 3 per cent of the world's finances, which is what we lost during the GFC. Also, the PIIGS group is a small part of Europe and I really cannot see that being a great danger. There is a risk there will be another decline as distinct from a recession, but that's likely to be in two to three years' time rather than in the foreseeable future."

Professor Todd Knoop from the Department of Economics and Business at Cornell College concurs. "I am not worried that another financial crisis is around the corner. History has shown us that crashes are always proceeded by booms, and while leverage ratios and lending are above where they were a year ago, they are not at the historic levels they were at before the 2009 crisis."

Margaret Lomas, the head of Destiny Financial Services and the Property Investment Professionals of Australia, has a different view. "I am of the definite opinion that the US has only just felt the beginning of what is to become a more major crisis for them. Confidence in the President is low and the sheer amount of national debt is simply a bigger version of the subprime crisis - there is little hope of them being able to even meet the interest bill on such a debt and the fallout may well be similar to that of Argentina - formerly an economically strong country now in the grips of severe financial depression."

Economist Professor Ian Harper said that deleveraging across the economy could result in a second dip or delay the recovery from the first one. There's a similar risk involved with excessive government debt but he cautioned that, "Whether the second round is more severe than the first is more difficult to predict. Governments tend to have more room to move compared with the private sector, given their powers to tax and print money. So while rising public indebtedness is certainly an issue, it need not precipitate a deeper crisis, even though it will slow recovery from the first dip, especially in the most affected countries."

Well, that's what the economic gurus foresee. What do you think? Is the global financial crisis set to return, only with more ferocity than before?

-------------------------------
http://blogs.theage.com.au/small-business/workinprogress/2010/03/26/financialcrisi.html

Uni degrees: who needs 'em?

Uni degrees: who needs 'em?
May 14, 2010

140uni.jpgA lot of fellows nowadays have a B.A., M.D., or Ph.D. Unfortunately, they don't have a J.O.B." So said American singer-songwriter, Fats Domino. He had a point. Putting aside professions such as medicine and law where a degree is essential, much of what is taught at university today isn't useful in the workplace.

A British survey conducted in March by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development revealed 60 per cent of graduates are working in a field unrelated to the degree they studied. And roughly one-in-four said their degree didn't equip them with the skills they needed to thrive at work. The results in Australia would probably be similar, with thousands of people thinking the completion of a degree is the finish line, when in reality it only entitles them to stand at the starting blocks. The real work starts at work.

The most talented senior manager I've ever had was a lady who hadn't spent a day on a university campus. The most hopelessly incompetent executives were those who'd completed not only a degree but also an MBA.

This doesn't imply a degree leads to poor performance. Rather, it just doesn't guarantee success. Not all masterful trainers have a degree in Adult Education. Many of the finest journalists don't have a degree in Communication. And some of the best musicians haven't studied at the Conservatorium.

People will argue the value lies not necessarily in the curriculum but with what a person becomes as a result of completing the degree. It'll prove they can solve problems! It'll show they can work under pressure! It'll demonstrate they can organise and prioritise! All of that may be true (or not), but those same attributes can be gleaned from other areas, such as the candidates' work experience, the adversities they've overcome, and their character in general.

I asked Shayne Herriott, the president of the National Association of Australian University Colleges, for his thoughts. "Obtaining a university degree is a lot more than what is learnt within a classroom or lecture theatre," he said. "A university degree is a series of challenges testing our ability to learn new and challenging subjects in a new environment surrounded by many distractions that are greatly different from school."

Admittedly, I'm a uni drop out. I had one year left of a Business degree when I realised it was no longer beneficial. I started it when I was in the corporate world. Eager to progress up the career ladder, I was very aware of the preference decision-makers had for resumes that contained a pithy reference to the applicant's degree. Despite being a student with a distinction average, I didn't learn a thing I could apply at work. Instead, I was forced to remember a bunch of management theories developed in the 1970s, all of which I've since forgotten.

These days, many job advertisements list a degree as a prerequisite. Check out the graduate section of the MyCareer site and you'll find job vacancies for a Recruitment Assistant, a Junior Marketing Coordinator, and another in Media Sales. It's uncertain why the lack of a degree is such a deal-breaker for roles where all the learning would presumably be on the job. It seems a degree merely qualifies you for the interview. It gets you in the door. Actually being able to do the job is an altogether separate and unrelated matter.

Rising in prominence is the Mickey Mouse degree, which is a term that disparagingly refers to qualifications of little relevance in the working world. Golf management and surf science are two such obscure examples, as are more common ones such as English Literature and History. How many job vacancies do you see advertised for a historian? Currently on MyCareer: none.

And then there's the aspirational MBA. There was a time when it was regarded as a unique accomplishment. But currently it seems like every ambitious worker's got one, or is at least contemplating the endeavour. A few years ago, I was recruiting for entry-level call centre positions and was floored by the flood of resumes from MBA graduates. It used to guarantee you a job in middle management. Now it guarantees you a period of muddle management.

People who undertake a degree should be applauded. It's a huge commitment, and the intention here isn't to denigrate their achievement. It's more a reflection on the perception of degrees and their supposed relevance in the workplace. Are they really supporting business? I don't think so. Not to a large degree.

http://blogs.theage.com.au/small-business/workinprogress/2010/05/14/unidegreeswho.html

A quick look at Transmile (14.5.2010)

Stock Performance Chart for Transmile Group Berhad





A quick look at Transmile (14.5.2010)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=t3UYetvUUuc1vbXWvCaAOTw&output=html

AVOID!!!
The company is still losing money.  It has a lot of debts.  


It's cash and cash equivalent is declining, presently at MR 86.43 million.  It is struggling using cash generated from working capital (account receivables' day decreased from 73 days to 27.5 days, and account payables' days increased from 22.3 days to 37.9 days).


At 50c per share, its market capitalisation is MR 135.06 million.  Its total equity in its balance sheet at 31.12.2009 was MR 22.26 million.  It's assets are in the planes.



Click also:
Lessons From Transmile

Thursday 13 May 2010

Cooking the Books: Investors, be warned.

This discussion should make you better able to see the clues of fraud and remind you to be vigilant.

Managers most often cook the books for personal financial gain - to justify a bonus, to keep stock prices high and options valuable or to hide a business's poor performance.  Companies most likely to cook their books have weak internal controls and have a management of questionable character facing extreme pressure to perform.

All fast-growing companies must eventually slow down.  Managers may be tempted to use accounting gimmicks to give the appearances of continued growth.  Managers at weak companies may want to mask how bad things really are.  Managers may want that last bonus before bailing out.  Maybe there are unpleasant loan covenants that would be triggered but can be avoided by cooking the books.  A company can just be sloppy and have poor internal controls.

One key to watch for is management changing from a conservative accounting policy to a less-conservative one, for example, changing from LIFO to FIFO methods of inventory valuation or from expensing to capitalizing certain marketing expenses, easing of revenue recognition rules, lengthening amortization or depreciation periods.

Changes like these should be a red flag.  There may be valid reasons for these accounting policy changes, but not many.  Be warned.

Related:



Cooking the Books: The Auditor's Job

Just as some people cheat on their tax returns, thinking they will not be caught, some companies "cook the books" hoping auditors and regulators will not catch them either.

Like "borrowing" $20 from the till until payday, and then not being able to repay the "loan," small illegalities can snowball into major fraud.

Remember, an auditor's job is only to review systematically the company's accounting and control procedures and then sample its business transaction to see whether appropriate policies and procedures are being followed in practice. But it is quite possible for a dedicated and corrupt management to mask transactions and deceive these auditors.


Related:

Cooking the Books: Sweetening the Balance Sheet

Most often both the Balance Sheet and the Income Statement are involved in cooking the books.  A convenient cooking is exchanging assets with the purpose of inflating the Balance Sheet and showing a profit on the Income Statement as well!

For example, a company owns an old warehouse, valued on the company books at $500,000, its original cost minus years of accumulated depreciation.  In fact, the present value of the warehouse if sold would be 10 times its book value, or $5 million.  The company sells the warehouse, books a $4.5 million profit and then buys a similar warehouse next door for $5 million.

Nothing has really changed.  The company still has a warehouse, but the new one is valued on the books at its purchase price of $5 million instead of the lower depreciated cost of the original warehouse.  The company has booked a $4.5 million gain, yet it has less cash on hand than it had before this sell-buy transaction.

Why would a company exchange one asset for a very similar one ... especially if it cost them cash and an unnecessary tax payment?  The only "real" effect of this transaction is the sale of an undervalued asset and booking of a one-time gain.  If the company reports this gain as part of "operating income,": the books have been cooked - income has been deceptively inflated.  If the company purports that this one-time capital gain is reoccurring operating income, it has misrepresented the earning capacity of the enterprise.


Related:

Cooking the Books: Puffing up the Income Statement

Puffing up the Income Statement most often involves some form of bogus sales revenue that results in increased profit.

One of the simplest methods of cooking the books is padding the revenue; that is, recording sales before all the conditions required to complete a sale have occurred.  The purpose of this action is to inflate sales and associated profits.  A particularly creative technique is self-dealings such as increasing revenue by selling something to yourself.

Revenue is appropriately recorded ONLY after all these conditions are met:

  1. An order has been received.
  2. The actual product has been shipped.
  3. There is little risk the customer will not accept the product.
  4. No significant additional actions are required by the company.
  5. Title has transferred and the purchaser recognizes his responsibility to pay.
The other common route to illegal reporting of increased profit is to lower expenses or to fiddle with costs.  A simple method to accomplish this deception involves shifting expenses from one period into another with the objective of reporting increased profits in the earlier period and hoping for the best in the later period.

Cooking the Books: This is very different from "Creative Accounting."

The vast majority of audited financial statements are prepared fairly.  They are assembled in accordance with GAAP and evidence sound fiscal controls and integrity of management.  However, sometimes this is not the case and financial fraud is committed:  illegal payments made, assets misused, losses concealed, expenses under-reported, revenue over-recorded and so forth.

Cooking the books is very different from "creative accounting."

It is creative to use accounting rules to best present your company in a favourable financial light.  It is legal and accepted.

"Cooking the books" means intentionally hiding or distorting the real financial performance and/or financial condition of a company.  Cooking the books is done for a deceptive purpose and is meant to defraud.


Related:

Cooking the Books: Why do managers cook the books?

Managers most often cook the books for personal financial gain -
  • to justify a bonus, 
  • to keep stock prices high and options valuable or 
  • to hide a business's poor performance.
Companies most likely to cook their books have weak internal controls and have a management of questionable character facing extreme pressure to perform.

"Cooking the books" means intentionally hiding or distorting the real financial performance or actual financial condition of a company.

Cooking is most often accomplished by moving items that should be on the Income Statement onto the Balance Sheet and sometimes vice versa.

A variety of specific techniques can be used to raise or lower income, raise or lower revenue, raise or lower assets and liabilities, and thereby reach whatever felonious objective the businessperson desires.  A simple method is outright lying by making fictitious transactions or ignoring required ones.


Related:

Cooking the Books: Techniques to Sweeten the Balance Sheet

C. Improperly increased or shifted period income.
D. Improperly increased assets and equity.


C.  Improperly increased or shifted period income

C1.  Current expenses shifted into later period
  • C1a.  Improperly capitalized costs as inventory.
  • C1b.  Assets depreciated or amortized too slowly.
  • C1c.  Worthless asset not written off immediately.
C2.  Shift revenue and income into later periods with reserves.


D.  Improperly increased assets and equity.

D1.  Increased equity through one-time gains
  • D1a.  Report gains on exchange of similar assets
  • D1b.  Report gains by selling undervalued assets
  • D1c.  Retire debt.
D2.  Report revenue rather than liability on receipt of cash.



"Cooking the books" means intentionally hiding or distorting the real financial performance or actual financial condition of a company.

Related:

Cooking the Books: Techniques to Puff Up the Income Statement

A.  Improperly increased revenue
B.  Improperly lowered cost or expenses.

A.  Improperly increased revenue

A1.  Sales recorded before completed and final

  • A1a.  Goods shipped before sale final
  • A1b.  Revenue recorded while future services still due

A2.  Bogus revenue recorded

  • A2a.  Supplier refunds recorded as revenue
  • A2b.  Revenue recorded from self-dealing
  • A2c.  Revenue recorded from asset exchanges.

B.  Improperly lowered costs or expenses

B1.  Current expenses shifted into later periods
  • B1a.  Period expenses capitalised onto Balance Sheet
  • B1b.  Assets depreciated too slowly.
  • B1c.  Probable liabilities not accrued.
B2.  Operating losses masked in discontinued operations


"Cooking the books" means intentionally hiding or distorting the real financial performance or actual financial condition of a company.


A quick look at Maybank (13.5.2010)


















A quick look at Maybank (13.5.2010)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tfMoQtAgU30SEiVrx-hXdHw&output=html

A quick look at JTI (13.5.2010)



A quick look at JTI (13.5.2010)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tOLRl0VcERSZUqz0FX99q3g&output=html

Prospects for This Financial Year
JT International Berhad expects the challenging operating environment to continue for the remainder of the year. The key challenge that will have a significant impact on its business will be the impending prohibition on the sales of cigarette packs containing less than 20 sticks that will be fully effective on June 1, 2010.

Illicit cigarettes, which now account for one out of three cigarette packs in the market, continue to present a major challenge to the legal tobacco industry. As the growth of the illicit cigarette trade is fuelled by significant excise tax increases implemented over the years, JT International Berhad is appreciative of the Government’s cognisance of this issue, which culminated in a more moderate excise tax increase in 2009. Moving forward, JT International Berhad hopes that moderate tax increases will continue to be implemented to curb the growth of the illicit cigarettes trade. JT International Berhad is also encouraged by the increased and integrated activities of the various Government enforcement agencies to combat this alarming issue. In addition to broadening their enforcement scope to the retail level, the Government agencies are now detaining and charging illicit cigarette traders in court as an effective deterrent measure. JT International Berhad will continue to cooperate fully with the authorities in the ongoing fight against the illicit cigarette trade and is hopeful that moderate increases in excise taxes, together with the current enforcement efforts by the Government agencies will curb the growth of the illicit cigarette trade.

Amidst these challenges, JT International Berhad is committed to maintain its competitiveness and aims to deliver a satisfactory overall performance for the current financial year through continued effective investment behind its global flagship brands - Winston, Mild Seven and Camel.

A quick look at Berjaya Sports Toto (13.5.2010)

Stock Performance Chart for Berjaya Sports Toto Berhad

A quick look at Berjaya Sports Toto (13.5.2010)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tar1l7PRo-VcfUWjN2NE-1Q&output=html

Wilmar's Q1 net beats forecast, upbeat on Asia

Wilmar's Q1 net beats forecast, upbeat on Asia



2010/05/13

SINGAPORE: Wilmar International, the world's largest listed palm oil firm, said it is positive on growth in Asian markets such as China and Indonesia after posting a better-than-expected 6 per cent rise in first quarter profits.

Wilmar, whose operations span from palm oil plantations in Malaysia to processing plants for soya and rice in China, generates around half of its revenue from China and is expected to benefit from strong Asian consumer demand growth.

"The group is positive on the prospects of Asian economies, especially China, India and Indonesia, and will continue to leverage on its well-established presence in these markets for growth," said Wilmar chairman and chief executive officer Kuok Khoon Hong.

Wilmar said late last year it wanted to invest at least US$1 billion in Indonesia, China and Africa, including starting up a sugar plantation in Indonesia, the world's fourth most populous country, this year.

The company, which has a market value of US$30 billion (US$1 = RM3.22), earned US$401 million in January-March, up from US$380 million made a year ago. The earnings were higher than the average forecast of US$385 million provided by three analysts surveyed by Reuters.

The profit rise was the smallest in years after Wilmar's string of double-digit earnings gains even during the financial crisis.

Its first quarter revenue climbed 36 per cent to US$6.8 billion.

The company said its palm and laurics business recorded a 30 per cent drop in pre-tax profit, despite a 29 per cent rise in sales volume, as margins fell due to tight supply and relatively less competitive pricing of palm oil compared to other edible oils.

Its oilseeds and grains business also recorded slightly lower margins but registered an 8 per cent rise in pre-tax profit as sales volumes rose by 12 per cent.

Wilmar's integrated China operations account for 44.7 per cent of its US$10.3 billion assets, and it competes with China Agri Industries and China Foods in a market with more than 1 billion people.

It also has plantation assets in Southeast Asia, competing with regional players such as Malaysia's Sime Darby, IOI Group and Indonesia's Astra Agro Lestari.

Malaysia's benchmark palm oil price declined by nearly 6 per cent since the start of the year, after soaring 57 per cent in 2009 as the global economy started to recover from the recession.

Wilmar shares have risen 1.7 per cent since the start of the year, outperforming a 1.4 per cent fall in the Singapore's Straits Times Index. - Reuters