Tuesday 25 May 2010

What are the Risks of Investing in Real Estate Investment Trusts?

What are the Risks of Investing in Real Estate Investment Trusts?

Of course, nothing in this life is guaranteed, and that includes real estate investment trusts.

REITs are more than just a pile of properties, they are active businesses, and subject to business risks. It's a testimony to the industry, however, that over the years only a handful have gotten into deep financial trouble.

According to Ralph L. Block in Investing in REITs, those real estate trusts that have gotten into trouble have done so primarily due to 
  • excessive debt leverage, 
  • poor allocation of capital resources, and 
  • questionable transactions with directors or major stockholders.
That's for individual REITs. As an industry, their businesses are subject to two particular risks no matter how well managed they are (though good management can succeed despite these dangers).

1.  Overbuilding or excess capacity, or overdevelopment.

Real estate property typically goes through a boom to bust cycle. When demand for offices/apartments/malls is going up, developers rush in to build more of these properties. It's difficult to know when enough is enough, and within a few years, too many offices/apartments/malls are on the market, and rents go up and occupancy rates go down.

Sometimes the problem is not with the amount of new properties put on the market, it's with the local economy. When it goes bust, for whatever reason, the local commercial real estate market goes down.

One good example is the San Francisco Bay Area during the late 1990s. During the dot com/high tech bubble, people in Silicon Valley were renting out their couches to computer programmers for hundreds of dollars a month. After the dot bomb crash of March 2001, when many high tech companies closed their doors, the market for office space in that area went downhill with it.

Such periods are known as renters markets, and are therefore bad for property owners.

It's simple economics. When supply goes up too much and/or demand goes down too much, the price of the product must go down.

2.  High interest rates

Interest rate increases affect REITs in a number of ways.

Since their value as an investment is for their income, higher interest rates in the overall economy makes bond yields higher, driving some money from REITs to bonds and preferred stocks.

In operating their businesses, higher interests rates makes it harder and more expensive for Real Estate Investment Trusts to borrow the money they need to expand.

Also, higher interest rates put pressure on the businesses they're renting to (by increasing their cost of borrowing money, and from reducing consumer income to spend), making it harder for those businesses to pay rent, or to pay higher rents.

Also, reduced sales in stores reduces the amount of overage rents that mall REITs can collect from the stores.

There is a risk in using current rental income to value a REIT. What current tenants are paying may be more or less than current market rents. When the current leases expire, the company will have to negotiate current market rents.

When current rents are below market rents, that's known as embedded rent growth or loss to lease, because when the lease is renewed, rents will have to go up.

When current rents are below market rents, that's known as rental roll-down, because when the lease is renewed, rental income will have to go down.

In a commercial lease, one year is used as a reference against which revenues or expenses are measured in later years. This is known as the base year.

The total leasable space in a commercial property is known as the Gross Leasable Area or GLA

http://www.incomeinvesthome.com/growth/reit/equity/risks.htm

Boy's RM8mil gambling losses!!!!

Tuesday May 25, 2010

Boy's RM8mil gambling losses
By EDWARD R. HENRY
edward@thestar.com.my


PORT KLANG: A boy who went into high-stakes gambling at the age of 16 accumulated losses amounting to about RM8mil by the time he was 19.

The boy, a millionaire’s son, had allegedly followed in his father’s footsteps by gambling and ended up losing millions in foreign football bets over the Internet.


His compulsion for betting was so great that he came to be known as the Little Dragon.

Yesterday, Klang Barisan Nasional chairman Datuk Teh Kim Poo (pic) who was unable to coax the teenager to come forward to relate his gambling spree, said the youth’s gambling habit stemmed from his father, a compulsive gambler.

“This teenager grew up watching his father gamble and at the age of 16, he began to gamble after gambling agents gave him a credit line of RM100,000. Each time he was buried in debt, his father would bail him out. Over these three years, there have been several bail-outs,” he said.

Teh added when the accumulated losses came to RM8mil, it was the last straw for the father. The man, in his 50s, barred him from gambling and stopped his son from attending college. He now works with his father.

According to Teh, the teenager who was pursuing an Australian degree programme at a college in Petaling Jaya had on several occasions used college fees to settle his debts and extend his credit line.

He would lie to his father that college fees needed to be paid and use the money to pay the gambling agents.

On occasions when he could not settle the debt, the agents would send Ah Long to collect from the father.

Teh said gambling agents were the culprits who went after teenagers from rich families.

“Most times, these agents would go to ‘high-end colleges’ and look for these rich kids. ”

Teh added that Pandamaran New Village had become a hot place for such gambling and simple wooden houses were equipped with Internet facilities for the activity.

On Sunday, Klang and Kapar MCA held an “Anti-Gambling at Internet Cafes” signature campaign at the Taman Eng Ann morning market.

It got more than 2,000 signatures from parents in two hours.

Klang OCPD Asst Comm Moha-mad Mat Yusop urged the public to provide information on gambling dens that existed in Internet cafes so swift action can be taken.


http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/5/25/nation/6332739&sec=nation

AIA bosses predict ‘disastrous’ Pru takeover

May 25, 2010

AIA bosses predict ‘disastrous’ Pru takeover

Christine Seib in New York and Leo Lewis in Hong Kong


Prudential’s $35.5 billion takeover of AIG’s Asian insurance business will be a disaster, according to senior executives at AIA, the Hong Kong-based company that the Pru is struggling to acquire.

One source at AIA in Hong Kong told The Times that there was a “tangible undercurrent” of concern over the takeover and that several executives had questioned Prudential’s ability to manage AIA effectively.

The executives’ comments came as it was reported that Mark Wilson, AIA’s chief executive, had told friends and industry executives that he planned to quit if the deal went through.

According to press reports last night, Mr Wilson said that he would step down because the combination of AIA and the Pru’s Asian business was “unworkable”.

Two senior executives, Steve Roder, AIA’s finance director, and Peter Cashin, its legal head, have already quit the company.

The timing of the comments are inconvenient for Prudential, coming just hours before it debuts its dual listing in Hong Kong, with a secondary listing in Singapore.

Traders arriving early at their desks in Asia on Tuesday said that rumours over possible executive quittings would have a “definite negative” impact on today’s dual listing of the Prudential in Hong Kong and Singapore.

Prudential had said earlier this month that the 43-year-old American, who joined AIA in 2002 from AXA, the French insurer, would remain as chief executive under the new ownership.

AIG, which must extract maximum value from AIA in order to repay its giant US government bailout, scrapped a plan to float AIA in favour of a sale to Prudential, which was announced in March.

Mr Wilson had stood to make a fortune out of the float and would have been chief executive of the independent listed company.

Other top AIA executives are expected to follow him out the door, if the deal closes. One person at the company told The Times that a number of workers, also annoyed by the fact that AIA’s float was scuppered, were watching how Mark Wilson responds and intend to take their lead from him.

But the source also suggested that Mr Wilson may be allowing rumours of his intention to quit to try to get an early sense of his worth to Prudential, and that his decision to quit or stay would actually depend on how “hands on” Prudential intends to be in a region it has only limited experience in.

The Pru said on May 17 when it published its prospectus that Mr Wilson would remain as chief executive of AIA, suggesting he had given at least an informal commitment to stay on.

The timing couldn’t be more inconvenient for the Pru, coming just hours before its shares are due to start trading in hong kong and singapore.

The Pru declined to comment.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article7135625.ece

A quick look at QL Resources (25.5.2010)

Stock Performance Chart for QL Resources Bhd



A quick look at QL Resources (25.5.2010)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=t8Bl00tf5MqO-9a41aIDekA&output=html

Investment myths


Investment myths

Tags: Ang Kok Heng | Buy low | Buy the best | Complicated | dividend | gambling | Long-term | market direction | October | Only for the rich | Risk of losing money | sell high | Sell in May | Short memories

Written by Ang Kok Heng
Monday, 24 May 2010 10:37


There are several investment myths that are uttered among the investing public. Some of them are true, while others may only apply in certain circumstances. Some investors or punters who have experienced similar situations believe that this is the investment maxim. There are so many versions of good investment practice, so much so that investors may just get more confused after hearing all these investment myths. Further explanations could help to clear some of these myths.


Buy low, sell high
Buy low and sell high is a common advice to investors. Many know this, but few actually know how to do it or do it well. When market is falling, it is always surrounded by various negative news and investors are fearful that the worst is not over and market can fall further. As such, it is difficult to “buy low”. As long as the market did not hit the bottom, there is always a chance that it may go down further after a purchase. Similarly, selling high is also difficult to practise. In a bull market when prices keep going up, chances are stock prices will continue to go up after the disposal.

Investors must remember “buy low, sell high” is not the same as “buy lowest, sell highest”. Low is relative. It means that prices are relatively low, though not the lowest. As long as prices have fallen substantially, it poses an opportunity for the buyer. Staggered purchase is recommended in a falling market, instead of a bullet investment. If the market has fallen by a substantial amount say 20%, it poses an opportunity to invest and investors can put in some money. If the market falls further and becomes even cheaper, investors can then buy more.

The “buy low, sell high” strategy must only be used when the overall fundamentals have not deteriorated substantially. In a crisis, this strategy must be used with care. If the market descends because of changes in sentiment, then this strategy will work well.


Buy the best, and ignore the rest
For savvy investors, buying a few good stocks and ignoring the rest of the noise is a good strategy. Different investors have different criteria as to what constitutes a “best” stock. Some will focus on pure fundamentals, which may also vary from person to person. Some of the fundamentals required by investors include prudent management, business model, business prospects, cash flow, dividend yield and valuation.

The problem with this method is that some stocks with strong fundamentals may not be the favourites among fund managers; thus, these stocks remain undervalued for years. Investors buying into these types of stocks must have lots of patience for the stocks to realise their true values.


Companies that pay regular dividends are safer investments
A bird in hand is better than two in the bushes. Companies that do well must also reward investors. Dividend is a proof of cash flow and the ability of the management to manage the company’s finances. An investor who invests in a stock is seeking a return which comes in two forms — dividend and capital gain. If the expected return is 10% and dividend yield is 4%, then the expected capital gain of 6% will depend on the market. This is better than hoping purely for capital gains of a non-dividend paying stock.


Don’t believe everything you hear
In a market full of various news and hearsay, it is difficult to differentiate between facts and rumours. There are many instances where owners and syndicates who want to see higher stock prices purposely fabricate various news on potential contracts, corporate exercise, etc to analysts and reporters with the intention to mislead investors. Every piece of news must be scrutinised to determine the authenticity and its impact on the earnings. Although this could be difficult in many cases, effort is still needed to avoid falling prey to unwarranted predators.

One advice for investors is to only believe events which are more likely to happen, and only on those stocks where the management can be trusted.


Don’t try to catch a falling knife
This is a different strategy from “buy low, sell high” which postulates buying on the way downwards. In a bear market, there are also many cases where the market continues to fall like a knife. A fundamentally-cheap buy can still go cheaper due to deteriorating market sentiment. Technical chartists will advise against buying downwards, as they will prefer to see the market hitting a bottom and start to show some confidence from buyers. Each method has its merits and demerits. “Buy low, sell high” is suitable for fundamental investors aiming for long term investment, whereas the “Don’t try to catch a falling knife” strategy is normally used by shorter term traders who do not want to tie up their money in the market.



Investors have very short memories

Some believe that investors are now smarter and they have learnt their lessons, but others think that investors have very short memories and they will continue to repeat the same mistakes again and again. The fear of losing money in a bear market and greed of making quick money in a bull market come and go when market progresses from boom to bust cycle. Investors, being human, are subjected to the psychological hurdle every time the market moves into the bear or bull phase. So long as investors cannot overcome the temptation of their peers to make a killing in the market, they could fall into the same trap again. When the market plunges the unwillingness to cut and take losses will get them “stuck” with some stocks.


Investing in stocks is like gambling
Certain people believe that the stock market is like a casino. Punters will buy a four-digit stock hoping for the share price to appreciate. Some will chase after hot news and look for stocks which are actively traded recently. Fundamentals are less important. What is more crucial is that the price must go up. A good stock is defined as one where the price will soar regardless of the fundamentals. The priority of a punter is to find the next winning horse and avoid the limping horse. This strategy was popular in the past. Some may make money from good tips, but many had experienced huge losses gambling this way, and they are still licking their wounds as many of these stocks have not seem to recover at all even though the market has recovered by 50% over the past one year.


Investing is complicated
Other than relying on tips to pick the favourite stock, some investors do not have a clue as to how to select the right stock. Although experts have advised them to do their homework, study annual reports, read research reports produced by analysts, buy on fundamentals, go for prudent management, etc, they find the process too tedious. Not only do they see contradictory recommendations from different research houses, they also do not know how to decide which stock is still undervalued. Some analysts say a stock is cheap but not exciting as the growth is low. Other analysts will recommend a stock based on the net present value of its discounted future cash flow. Some use price/book ratio, price-earnings ratio, price over enterprise value, PE over growth ratio, etc. As there is no single method to judge which is a best stock to buy, investors get more confused when they start to do some research. They realised even the so-called “gurus” could be wrong too.

No doubt, investment is not easy. If it is so easy, everyone will be rich and nobody will need to work. Doing some homework may not guarantee profit but it can only help to avoid some of the investment pitfalls. Knowing what you are investing in is better than investing blindly. The additional knowledge accumulated over the years will help to reduce the risk of investment and hopefully it will lead to a wiser choice of selection.


Investing is too risky
Besides the hard work needed to commence investing, the risk of losing money may deter would-be investors. Seeing how some of their friends lose large sums of money dabbling in the stock market may imply that investing in the stock market is risky. The only safe way is to avoid this type of investment. Some have resorted to investing in unit trusts to grow their money. However, investing in unit trusts still requires certain forms of investment knowledge such as the timing of investment, type of funds and manager’s investment styles.

There is no doubt that investing in the stock market has risks. Those who do not know how to invest and do not have the discipline to follow an investment policy will continue to fail. There are also many who have invested successfully for years. Investors should follow the footsteps of successful investors who are able to grow their wealth via investment rather than be deterred by the unsuccessful dabblers who rely on luck instead to make money.


October is a bad stock month
Although Halloween falls in October, it is not a curse for the stock market. However, for whatever reason, many investment mishaps so happened occurred in September/October — the Wall Street Crash of 1929, Black Monday in 1987, 1997’s South American market crash, the Sept 11 (2001) terrorist attack, subprime crisis in US causing a black week where the US market fell by 18% in September 2008, etc. Historically, October is a bad month in terms of stock performance and it also denotes the bottom of the market for investors looking to buy for the medium term of 3-5 months.

Out of the 10 biggest one-day falls in the US, seven falls were in October. This could be a coincidence. There is no assurance that the next crash will be in October, but when it does come, it also poses an opportunity for those who believe in long term investment.


‘Predicting’ the stock market is impossible
Nobody can predict the market direction — how high it can go and how low it can fall. The general trend of the stock market is upward bias due to corporate earnings growth. Market moves in a cycle similar to the economic cycle. But it is also very much influenced by market sentiment and the flow of global funds seeking maximum returns. From time to time, it follows market fundamentals on PE valuation and earnings growth. There are also times when the market is driven by fear of changes in policies.


Sell in May, go away
This is a seasonal indicator for investors who think that summer holidays are bad for the market. If buying fund managers were on leave during this period, the market may come down. On the other hand, if selling fund managers were on summer holidays, then it may not be a bad news.

“Sell in May, go away” also denotes the six-month period from May to October where the market generally performs poorer than the other six-month period from November to April. Between May and October, the worst months were September and October. The month of May appears to be a reasonable month as far as stock performance is concerned.


Stock markets are only for the rich
Some investors believe the rich have the upper hand when it comes to investments as they have deep pockets to average down in a falling market. The rich definitely have that advantage. The limited resources of the “poor” suggest that they adopt a bullet investment style by putting all their investments in a single stock in a single day. In this way, there is no time diversification for the “poor” who have limited resources to invest. The bullet investment style is definitely riskier. For those who can afford, time diversification is preferred. One does not need to be a multi-millionaire to dabble in the stock market. In fact, small investors also have an advantage over large institutional investors who may have several hundreds of millions to invest. For one, small investors can invest in a wider range of stock without fear of liquidity constraint when it comes to selling.


The long-term always pays off
This statement seems to suggest long-term (LT) investors perform better than short-term (ST) investors. Other than the duration of investment, the strategies of LT and ST investment, may not be the same. LT investors tend to invest in low beta, fundamentally-sound investment grade stocks, whereas ST investors tend to look for higher beta, volatile and high-liquidity situational stocks. In a bullish market, ST investors could make more provided appropriate cut loss strategies are put in place. There are also many LT investors who kept a portfolio of non-performing stocks where prices continue to decline due to deteriorating earnings.

What is required is the right strategy regardless of short-term or long-term investment.


What goes up must come down
Like Newton’s Law of Gravity, “what goes up must come down”, this investment myth describes the volatile pattern of stock prices. While the price of a trading stock may fluctuate within a certain range from the mean, the price of a growth stock will continue to go up in the long run. Even if the price of a growth stock goes down, it is only temporary. Having said this, in the


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, May 24, 2010.

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/in-the-financial-daily/166634-investment-myths.html

Monday 24 May 2010

Stocks that won't fall in market meltdown. Do such stocks exist?

Stocks that won't fall in market meltdown
24 May 2010, 0218 hrs
IST,Ramkrishna Kashelkar,ET Bureau

After the skeletons popped out of the closets of the world’s largest economy in 2008, it's the time for the weak members of Europe to put their soft belly on display. The fiscal problems that surfaced in some of the Euro zone countries as much capable of disrupting the global economy as the US's financial system fiasco in 2008.

As the international economist Nouriel Roubini puts it, first came rescue of private firms, and now comes the rescue of the rescuers - ie, the governments. Rumours abound that problems are much worse than what meets the eye.

There is no doubt that what investors have seen in the US sub-prime mortgage crisis makes them more susceptible to such rumours. And as a result the volatility continues. At a time when the markets are gloomy and the media is abuzz with talks on things like fiscal crises, double-dip recession, overheating, debt burdens et al one just can’t be overcautious.

Retail investors, in particular, are cursed to fail in such markets. 

  • Firstly they are always late to react - be it a rally or a fall. 
  • And secondly, the doubts ‘what if I sell out today and markets rebound tomorrow?’ or vice-versa never leave them at peace. 
It, therefore, pays to build a portfolio that has inherent shock absorbers.

However, if you haven’t installed these shock absorbers already, it is not too late to act. But the end to the current volatility is nowhere in sight and investors can rightly be scared of making fresh investments. Wouldn’t it, therefore, be just wonderful, if we had a handful of companies that won’t buckle, if the markets were to fall further, but will bounce back, if the stability were to return? Do such stocks exist?

Yes, they do. In fact, ET Intelligence Group has unearthed a few such investment ideas, which fit the bill - they are available at attractive valuations and hold the potential to reward investors once the market sentiment turns positive. And the list contains companies from various industries apart from just FMCG and Pharmaceuticals - the traditional friends in the times of volatility.

We have mainly five types of companies here.

  • Firstly there are large brand driven FMCG businesses with large cash generating capacities. 
  • Then we have companies commanding almost monopolistic leadership in their respective industries. 
  • There are companies that have recently completed major capex and are going to reap its benefits in FY11.
  • A couple of companies that have seen their business models evolve into becoming more robust also figure in the list. 
  • At the end, we have chosen two companies that have taken a disproportionately bigger hit in the weak market and are now available at attractive valuation compared to their peers.

Brand driven businesses

FMCG and pharma industries have always been well regarded as recession-busters. So much so that in market rallies, when these sectors start picking pace, market observers start predicting a correction. Most of these stocks are slow gainers, but they hold the capacity to make a new all-time high in every bull-run. One main problem, however, is that owing to their market credibility and a long-history of superior performance, they don’t come in cheap.

Despite rising food inflation pressuring the profit margins of the company, Nestle India remains one of the priciest FMCG company on the Dalal Street with a price-to-earning (P/E) multiple of 42. Its market leadership in the niche product category of ready-to-eat food and dairy product has enabled its revenues and profits to grow at a strong pace. Despite the stretched valuations, it remains a classic defensive stock.

The diversified nature of ITC makes its business model de-risked. A stronger growth in its non-cigarette businesses is reducing its dependence on tobacco business for forging its future growth. Valued at little over six times its annual revenues and a (P/E) ratio of 26, the scrip appears reasonably valued with limited downside risk. Its ability to raise dividends year-after-year adds to its attractiveness.

Similarly, Dabur India’s non-cyclical product-mix in consumer care, healthcare, food and retail with strong brand recall and international presence makes it an attractive consumer business. The company has outperformed its peers in the past several quarters justifying its premium valuations at P/E of 32.

GSK Consumer Healthcare (GSKCH) is a market leader in niche category of malt based health drinks with a portfolio of OTC drugs. Although its margins were affected by rising food prices, it has successfully kept competition at bay. Despite trading at high valuations, this company has limited downside risk given its niche product category and non-cyclical nature of its business.

GlaxoSmithKline Pharma is the third largest player in the domestic pharma market. Its established international lineage, consistent growth, market leadership in many therapeutic areas and strong brand equity work in its favour. The company is aggressively increasing its presence in various therapeutic areas and expanding its field force. Its stock is trading at a P/E of 33. While these are relatively high valuations, the company is a promising long-term buy - offering limited down side.

Monopolistic Business Model

The country’s largest paints company, Asian Paints, has enjoyed almost a monopolistic leadership in the decorative paints segment. The company has greatly benefited from increasing consumer spending in the domestic market over the past few years. While the domestic market is the key driver for the company’s growth, Asian Paints has been consolidating its portfolio in the international market.

The company has divested its four loss making units in the South Asian region in order to mitigate the erosion of profitability in its international operations. Unless there is a significant drop in the consumer demand, the company’s business has limited downside risk. Trading at a consolidated P/E of 27, the company offers a good defensive bet to the long-term investors.

Another company, which is assured of its revenues by nature of its monopolistic business, is Gail - India’s largest transporter of natural gas. In the years to come, a vast majority of gas consumers will continue to depend on Gail’s pipeline for a seamless supply of natural gas, which will be a preferred fuel for the coming generations.

Gail has long been a cash-rich company, with very low debt. It will be spending nearly Rs 50,000 crore in the next four years to lay new pipeline and expand its polymer capacity. Defying the overall weakness in the market, Gail’s shares have gained 5.6% last week despite Sensex losing over 3.2%.

Crisil enjoys a similarly dominating position in a highly-competitive industry. Its business of providing rating, research and advisory services is far more insulated than other businesses in financial services domain. Firstly, this is not a fund-based business like lending. Since the asset base is low, return on capital employed is much higher. Secondly, even in a case of stock market downturn, the demand remains for research and advisory services making it a sustainable business model.

Crisil has always been a zero-debt company with strong dividend paying record. Its current price-to-earning multiple (P/E) of 28 is lower compared to what it commanded in 2005, 2006 and 2007. This shows that the stock has scope to move up further from here.

Container Corporation of India (Concor) is almost an indispensable company when it comes to transporting goods across the country by rail. Concor has always enjoyed a dominant position in the domestic container rail freight segment. The company is debt-free and cash-rich, which has enabled it to fund its expansion plans of the past few years entirely from internal accruals. A detailed write-up on page 2 gives a better perspective on the company.

The country’s largest auto component maker Bosch enjoys a similar position in its industry. Its product range is such that every vehicle on the road carry some of the Bosch component right from fuel injection systems to spark plugs to wipers to batteries. Besides, the company is also a market leader non-automotive segments such as hand tools, compact packaging equipment and automotive audio systems. Its continues to introduce latest products in the market thanks to its German parent, Robert Bosch

Its German parent, Robert Bosch is the largest auto component maker and an technology leader. The company is debt-free and has a history of strong operating cash with ever rising dividend payments. Not surprisingly, at the height of the market meltdown in 2008, Bosch market capitalisation exceeded most of its customers except Maruti Suzuki and Hero Honda. At its current market price, the stock is trading at just 21 times its trailing 12-months earnings and is a good buy.

Completed Capex

In the second category of companies that have completed major capex plans, we have companies like Petronet LNG. Petronet doubled its LNG capacity in the second half of last year with the additional 2.5 MTPA LNG supply starting in January. Its March 2010 quarterly numbers failed to show its benefits as RIL’s cheaper gas flooded the markets.

Completion of Gail’s pipelines in the North India will allow it to increase sales volumes as more customers get connected to the gas pipeline grid. Considering the company’s secured income source by way of regassification charges and its expanded capacities, a P/E of 15 appears attractive.

The pharma major Cipla may not have done well on the bourses in the past few years, but it has been busy building up capacities. In the past three years up to FY09, the company spent nearly Rs 1,700 crore on building its fixed assets. It is preparing to launch its robust product line in overseas markets including asthma inhalers. The company’s current valuations do not fully reflect these upsides.

JSW Energy is another such example, where the market has failed to reward capacity addition due to the weak sentiments. The company had a very impressive growth in the fourth quarter of FY10, with sales and profit going up almost three times over last year, aided by commissioning of 600 MW of generation capacity.

The company will be nearly doubling its total generation capacity in FY11, based on the current status of its various projects, which will give a significant boost to its financials. The stock currently trades at a P/E of 22 times, which provides huge upside potential.

The buoyancy in real estate industry is set to do good for Mahindra Lifespaces, which currently has almost 8 million square feet of properties at various stages of launch or under construction. The company predominantly operates in the mid and high-end residential segment in Mumbai, Pune, Nashik, NCR, Chennai and Nagpur. It recently launched its mass housing project in Gurgaon.

It currently has two SEZ’s in Chennai and Jaipur, both of which are seeing a strong traction in the recent past. The company is debt light, which is the main differentiating factor between other players. On an annualised EPS of Rs 23.2, it is trading at a price to earnings multiple of 18, that appears reasonable considering the growth prospects.

Delhi-based Anant Raj Industries continues to monetise assets where it is able to get lucrative prices. In December 2009 quarter, it sold its commercial property of 0.11 million sq ft at Rs 6,500 per sq ft. Net revenue booked during the quarter was Rs 6 crore from this project. The company has been increasing its rental income on a quarter-on-quarter basis, as it booked rental Rs 13.6 crore in December 2009 as against Rs 11.3 crore in the previous quarter. In another mall, the company has been continuously leasing space.

Going ahead, it will be launching two residential projects at premium locations, an IT Park, and also rentals will start coming from its malls. The stock is currently trading at 16 times its trailing 12 months earnings, leaving enough scope to gain in the coming months.

Changing business model:

A focused management can gradually change the business model of a company to bring in better efficiencies or integration that can take it to its inflexion point -a point beyond which the growth will speed up. The first departmental store retailer Shoppers Stop and textile major Alok Industries appear to have reached such inflexion points.

Shoppers Stop has evolved its business model over a period of last decade that will enable it now to scale up faster in the coming years. It has been derisking its merchandise model with a higher share of consignment as against the bought-out share, while its cost-cutting exercise has started paying off as visible in better margins in the two quarters.

Most of its subsidiaries have already turned profitable with a turnaround in the home solutions and international airport retail venture expected in near future. Its footfalls to sales conversion ratio came down in the March 2010 quarter, but a significant increase in average transaction size and average sales price have kept the like-to-like store growth up.

Going ahead, the company has aggressive growth plans to open 8 stores in FY11, and another 10-12 stores in the next financial year. This will cumulatively add about 1 million sq ft to the existing 20.4 million sq ft of space. These factors enable the company to justify its P/E above 27 and P/BV above 4.7, which are unlikely to weaken in market turmoil.

Alok Industries has emerged as a vertically integrated textile company with five core business divisions viz. cotton spinning, polyester yarn, garments, apparel fabric and home textiles. Its subsidiary, Alok Retail operates its branded stores ‘H&A’ having 216 stores across the country. It plans to expand to 450 shops by 2011.

Over the past 4-5 years, the company has invested heavily to create large production capacities. These capacities plus its integrated business model put it in a unique position to control the raw material costs while producing high-value-added products.

This has enabled it to expand its operating profits at a CAGR of 38% in the past five years, against a 22% growth in the topline. Galloping interest costs has so far eroded its profits, but its plans to monetise its real estate assets in near future can address the problem squarely. Considering the huge entry, the company has erected against its integrated business model, the downside appears limited at a P/E multiple of 6x.

Changed valuations

Going out of market’s favour can bring down the valuations significantly. However, if the business model is robust, it doesn’t take long to win back the favour. Pursuing the tariff wars and stringent regulatory recommendations, the telecom industry has been facing a lot of heat and has fallen out of market’s favour.

A steeper fall compared to its peers has made the valuations of Reliance Communications highly attractive, where a further weakness appears unlikely.

RCom lost over 50% since last October as a sharp drop in telecom fares lowered its profitability. The future, however, appears bright.

The company has domestic and global assets in the form of telecom infrastructure in India and under-sea fibre optic network overseas. Its telecom towers are fast gaining tenancy from other operators, which is likely to support its revenue in future. It’s 3G licences win in 13 circles including Mumbai and Delhi gives a better balance between the initial capex fees and revenue prospects. Given its low valuations and asset base, the stock looks attractive at the current levels.

The cement industry also has been worrying over the price realisations and the dampened demand in the upcoming monsoon season could keep it unattractive for a while. However, there is no reason a company like JK Lakshmi Cement should trade at half its book value and a P/E of 3.3x. The company is focusing on northern markets where demand is strong and provides the necessary growth momentum over the medium term. Its cement capacity will grow to 5.3 million tonne from current 4.7 MT during FY11.

One of the key assumptions that have gone in preparing this list is that the current debt crisis in the Europe can be contained and tackled reasonably within the next few weeks. No stock market investments will remain safe if the crisis blows out of proportions into what we saw in 2008.

(With inputs from Amrit Mathur, Ashish Agrawal, Karan Sehgal, Kiran Somvanshi, Ranjit Shinde and Supriya Verma)

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5966128.cms

Take a long shot in such choppy markets. Investors tend to forget that equities deliver only in the long term

Take a long shot in such choppy markets
24 May 2010, 0501 hrs
IST,Nikhil Walavalkar & Prashant Mahesh,ET Bureau

Increased volatility in markets has made life difficult for equity investors in India. The risk that some European governments may default has thrown a scare into equity markets globally. Though domestic economic fundamentals are sound, flight of some foreign funds has eroded value of companies on Indian exchanges.

A look at indices’ movement shows that S&P CNX Nifty has lost 5.43% since January 2010 whereas Nifty Mid-cap 50 index lost 2.21%. But this is rather deceptive. If one looks at the fall from the highest point, the indices (the Nifty level of 5374) in the current calendar year, the Nifty lost 7.94% in 30 sessions and Nifty Mid-cap lost 7.32% in 14 sessions, as on May 20, 2010. This has confused retail investors. Now, the million-dollar question that haunts all of them is — “What should I do with my equity investments?”

QUICK ACTIONS

Though often repeated, investors tend to forget that equities deliver only in the long term. So, if you are there with your short-term resources for some quick buck, just follow the classical advice and get out of equities. This applies to even the best of the conviction ideas you have. “Though there is some global uncertainty, there is no crisis. The current correction is a good buying opportunity, as markets have corrected 10-15%, and we are positive on mid-cap stocks as valuations there are at a discount to large caps,” says K Ramanathan, chief investment officer, ING Mutual Fund.

Leverage can be disastrous when equities obey the laws of gravity. In volatile times, futures, too, may emerge as the weapons of mass destruction, as envisaged by legendary investor Warren Buffett. Given the circumstances, it’s better to cut down naked derivative exposures and avoid taking any positions using borrowed money.

If you are not sure of the equity markets’ future in the near term, change all your lump-sum investments in mutual funds and other vehicles into systematic investment plans (SIP) to ensure that you don’t commit the mistake of trying to time the market. If you need some time to think before you act, you can consider buying insurance by way of purchasing index ‘put’ options. Of course, there is a cost attached to it.

THINK BEFORE YOU JUMP

Equity investing is an art as well as science. Especially in cases, where you decide it on your own, it becomes a tight-rope walk. “One should stick to strong conviction ideas with strong fundamentals. Fundamentally, strong companies are last to fall and first to bounce back when the environment changes,” asserts Vinod Ohri, president-equity, Gupta Equities. It makes sense to revisit the portfolio with a single question in mind — If I am given money, will I buy the share I am holding now? If the answer to this question comes positive, your investment deserves a place in your portfolio. If you are not sure if you will buy it at the current price, probably, it’s the time to bid adieu to that stock.

“Retail investors need to at least check business performance of companies in which they have invested, by going to the exchange website,” says Sunil Shah, director-equities, Indsec Securities & Finance. This is even more important in case of small-, and mid-cap companies, where there is no or limited research coverage. “As a broad rule, one can decide to stay with mid-cap stocks, enjoying single-digit price earning multiples and book profits, where the mid-cap stocks quote at price multiple of more than 20,” adds Mr Shah.

If you are not sure as to how the global crisis will unfold, you can choose to convert some of your equities into short-term fixed income instruments to earn decent ‘return on capital’ without compromising on ‘return of capital’.

Strategies

As of now, the domestic economy is in shape. Some experts prefer to restrict their equity exposure to ideas that revolve around domestic themes such as consumption and infrastructure. One can cut his exposure on export-oriented companies.

There is another advice to stick to companies with least leverage. This may come handy if the credit crisis spread beyond European countries. Look at only those companies with no or nominal debt on books. To play safe, one can avoid companies that are still in the capital expenditure mode and are expected to guzzle a good amount of cash.

Looking for price supports is a very much a normal act of savvy equity investors. Some call it special situations-investing. Investing in fundamentally strong companies where due to open offer or some other corporate action there exists a safety net is a good bet in weak markets. Delisting offers also can be considered here.

Ultra-conservative investors looking at equity can resort to a capital protection strategy. If you have, say Rs 5 lakh, to invest with a three-year time-frame, invest Rs 4 lakh in fixed deposits, earning an 8% return and invest the rest in diversified equity funds with a good track record using systematic investment plans. Here, your investments in fixed deposits will ensure that you get Rs 5 lakh back at the end of three years. At the same time, your equity investments will earn superior returns for you.

Ultimately, investors will be better off sticking to their asset allocation. Of course, one can take tactical calls of moving from one type of equities (such as mid-caps) to another type (large-cap). One should never forget that all bear markets start with correction. Greed leads to investors throwing good money after bad ideas. It is time to have some conviction in the Indian growth story and buy quality businesses at attractive prices slowly and steadily.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5966749.cms

Stockmarket: what should investors do now?

Stockmarket: what should investors do now?
The FTSE100 dropped below the 5,000 barrier in the aftermath of the naked short-selling ban in Germany and the ongoing euro crisis.

By Paul Farrow
Published: 3:07PM BST 21 May 2010

Investors had been enjoying a market revival since shares hit their March 2009 lows. Markets had become more volatile in recent weeks but many fund managers had ruled out any possibility of a full-blown stock market crash.

However, the eurozone crisis is worsening and many analysts are predicting a double-dip recession and further market falls.

Paul Niven, head of asset Allocation at F&C, said: "Equity markets have entered into a technical correction, with major indices, such as the US S&P 500 falling more than 10pc from recent peaks. The VIX index of 'fear and greed' (which measures the volatility of the S&P500) has hit 13-month highs and is back trading at levels only seen during the 2008 meltdown.

"The way that markets are now behaving is suggestive of a move to pricing in renewed and significant economic weakness and the danger for investors is that market action will begin to negatively permeate economic fundamentals. It may be that capitulation is required in the near term to mark a short term trough in risk assets."

Financial advisers admit that no one can predict what will happen and suggest the best way to avoid boom-and-bust cycles is to make objective investment decisions that ignore fashions. What's more there will be some fund managers who argue that the volatility will trigger buying opportunities, although it is understandable that caution is the operative word for many investors at this juncture.

The advice from the great and the good, more often than not, is not to panic. There is the well-trodden argument from Fidelity that "it's about the time in the market, not out of it that counts''. But that can seem flippant when it comes to the prospect of losing your hard-earned cash.

Experts say that if you haven't already, it would be well worth reviewing your holdings to see if you are overexposed to any asset class or classes. Diversification and getting the balance right are vital.

Patrick Connolly at AWD Chase de Vere said that most people don't appreciate the risk they are taking when stock markets are going up. They only realise when markets are going down or are more volatile and then can panic and sell out at entirely the wrong time, he said.

"Too often investors buy at the top of the market when they are feeling bullish and sell out at the bottom when they are feeling negative. They should not allow short-term sentiment to influence their decision," said Connolly.

"The right approach is to hold a level of cash and then a diversified portfolio including shares, fixed interest and commercial property. These different investments need to be held in the right proportion to meet the requirements and risk profile of individual investors."

AWD Chase de Vere suggest that a diversified portfolio could include investment funds such as, PSigma Income, M&G Global Leaders, Cazenove European, Threadneedle American, JPM Emerging Markets, M&G Property Portfolio, Fidelity Moneybuilder Income and Schroder Strategic Bond.

Connolly added: "While panicking and selling is likely to be the wrong approach, for those who are concerned it is sensible to review their existing holdings and ensure they have the right level of diversification in their portfolios."

Adrian Lowcock at Bestinvest said that investors should look to have exposure to other asset classes, such as bonds, commercial property and absolute return funds.

His favoured funds in each of these sectors include Invesco Perpetual Tactical Bond, Henderson UK Property, Standard Life Global Absolute Return Strategies. He added: "The EU/IMF bail-out package will struggle to contain the issue and markets have responded accordingly. Investors should look to diversify their portfolios to reduce volatility but it is likely to be a bumpy ride in the short term."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/7749761/Stockmarket-what-should-investors-do-now.html

Nouriel Roubini said the bubble would burst and it did. So what next?

Nouriel Roubini said the bubble would burst and it did. So what next?
The dismal science? Don't believe a word of it. If Nouriel Roubini's New Year's Eve invitations were anything to go by, economics is far from the dour affair it once was.


By Jonathan Sibun
Published: 5:51PM BST 23 May 2010



Holed up in the Caribbean island of St Bart's, Roubini was forced to choose between two parties. The first hosted by Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich, the second by Colonel Gaddafi's son Hannibal.
While dancing the night away with a Russian oligarch or the son of a Libyan dictator might not be everyone's glass of Cristal, the invitations show just how far the New York university professor has come in the celebrity stakes.
Just three years earlier, Roubini had been the object of derision in the economics community as he prophesied a US housing market crash, financial crisis and partial collapse of the banking sector. Today, as an adviser to governments and central bankers and much feted in the media, he's well aware of the power of being right.
"In my line of business your reputation is based on being right," he says. "The publicity is just noise. Certainly with a global crisis, the dismal scientists are having some prominence, even if most of the economics profession actually failed to predict it."
The 51-year-old, widely known as Dr Doom, is in town to publicise his new book Crisis Economics, a crash course in the financial crisis and what can be done to avoid another.
The book does little to suggest he is uncomfortable with his nickname. Where Roubini is concerned, the great recession has some way to run.
"The crisis is not over; we are just at the next stage. This is where we move from a private to a public debt problem," he says, his speech the mongrel drawl of a man who was born in Turkey to Iranian parents, raised in Israel and Italy and lives in New York. "We socialised part of the private losses by bailing out financial institutions and providing fiscal stimulus to avoid the great recession from turning into a depression. But rising public debt is never a free lunch, eventually you have to pay for it."
As eurozone leaders panic and markets continue to dive, Roubini believes Greece will prove to be just the first of a series of countries standing on the brink.
"We have to start to worry about the solvency of governments. What is happening today in Greece is the tip of the iceberg of rising sovereign debt problems in the eurozone, in the UK, in Japan and in the US. This... is going to be the next issue in the global financial crisis."
It already is. And Roubini claims to have foreseen it as far back as 2006.
"I was writing about the PIGS [Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain] six to nine months before everyone else, I was worried about the future of the monetary union back in 2006," he says. "At the World Economic Forum I outraged a policy official by suggesting the monetary union might break up."
Roubini has sandwiched a visit to the The Daily Telegraph's offices between a private meeting with Bank of England Governor Mervyn King – "I regularly meet with policy makers. I don't know if it's even worth mentioning" – and a talk at the London School of Economics. I ask him if I can see his LSE speech.
"I haven't written one. I never prepare a speech, I don't even have notes. I usually just speak out of my own thoughts; stream of consciousness."
It's a manner he adopts when we meet. Looking over my shoulder, declining eye contact, he moves seamlessly between what he describes as the economist's usual suspects – "the US, eurozone, Japan, China, emerging markets, inflation, deflation, markets" – as he must when teaching his 400 students in New York.
The prognosis for all the suspects save China and the emerging markets is grim, little wonder given the backdrop of a 3.8pc drop in the FTSE last week and panic among investors spooked by German chancellor Angela Merkel's short-selling ban. The ban has been dismissed as fiddling while Rome, or rather the eurozone, burns.
Roubini believes Greece's problems will see the country forced to restructure its debt and raises the longer term prospect of a breakdown of the union with the potential exits of Greece, Spain and Portugal.
Could it survive such a blow? "Well you could think of a world where there is a eurozone with only a core of really strong economies around Germany," he says. "But the process that would lead to one or more countries leaving the union would be so disruptive that the euro as a major reserve currency would be severely damaged."
Like many economists, Roubini does not talk in absolute predictions. It is all about what could happen in worse case scenarios.
But he argues they are only becoming more likely under current political leadership, the UK's new Conservative-Liberal coalition included. "I am worried about the hung parliament. Whenever you have divided, weak or multi-party governments, budget deficits tend to be higher. It is harder to make the necessary sacrifices."
He dismisses the £6bn of cuts announced by the coalition as "small compared to what is needed", but rejects the idea that the UK is worse off than many of its peers.
"In the US there is a lack of bipartisanship between Democrats and Republicans, in Germany Merkel has just lost the majority in her legislature, in Japan you have a weak and ineffective government, in Greece you have riots and strikes," he says. "The point is that a lot of sacrifices will have to be made in these countries but many of the governments are weak or divided. It is that political strain that markets are worried about. The view is: you can announce anything, we'll see whether you're going to implement it."
This, he explains, is the ultimate challenge facing governments.
"If you're pushing through austerity while there is growth that's one thing, but if you're pushing it through while the recession is deepening, politically that is harder to sell. And the eurozone doesn't just need fiscal consolidation but also structural reform to increase productivity and restore competitiveness," he says.
Germany is the blueprint, Roubini points out, but "it took a decade for them to see the benefits of structural reform and corporate restructuring".
"If Spain and Portugal start today, you'll see the short-term cost without the long-term benefit and they might run out of political time," he says. "That's why I worry about several eurozone members having to restructure their debt, or deciding that the benefits of staying in the monetary union are less than the cost of it."
The prognosis for the UK is, at least, a little less alarming. An independent currency gives it a few more levers to pull – quantitative easing means default is unlikely to be an issue. But that comes with its own challenges.
"Eventually inflation will go up and that erodes the real value of public debt," Roubini says. "In that scenario the value of the pound will fall sharply. It could even become disorderly and that could damage the economy, the financial markets and also the role of the pound as a reserve currency."
Yet another challenge for Government then. Whether the coalition can live up to it remains to be seen. And whether it thinks it has to.
Roubini is adamant that the great recession is not over. But a temporary economic pick-up, which would convince governments that reform is unnecessary, could bring its own problems.
"People asked me why I saw there was a bubble and my question was why others didn't. During the bubble everybody was benefiting and losing a sense of reality," he says. "And now, since there is the beginning of economic recovery – however bumpy that might be – in some sense people are already starting to forget what happened two years ago. Banks are going back to business as usual and bonuses are back to levels that are outrageous by any standards. There is actually a backlash against even moderate reforms that governments are trying to pass."
Reform, Roubini insists, is necessary, recovery or not. "We are still in the middle of this crisis and there is more trouble ahead of us, even if there is a recovery. During the great depression the economy contracted between 1929 and 1933, there was the beginning of a recovery, but then a second recession from 1937 to 1939. If you don't address the issues, you risk having a double-dip recession and one which is at least as severe as the first one."
Roubini has built his reputation on such forecasts. So, given the real reputation builder was forecasting the crisis, has he been one of the few to enjoy the troubled times of the past few years?
"We are witnessing the worst global economic crisis in the last 60 to 70 years and for an economist that offers an opportunity," he says. "So it has been interesting, but the damage financially and economically has been so severe and so many people have suffered. Anybody involved has to bear that in mind."

The housing affordability flaw

The affordability flaw
MARIKA DOBBIN
May 24, 2010
This time last year, houses were at their most affordable in eight years, but things are different now: affordability in Melbourne has crashed.

A SHEET of paper posted outside a shop in Victoria Street, Abbotsford, says a lot about the housing market.

''I buy houses and pay $20,000 more,'' it reads.

The words, scrawled and underlined in black texta, speak to the edge of panic about rising prices that has pushed buyers to extremes in the past year.

Affordability in Melbourne's housing market has crashed in spectacular fashion, according to the HIA-CBA First Home Buyer Affordability Report last week.

Although in the first quarter of 2009, houses were at their most affordable in eight years, things are very different this time around.

Melbourne led a national deterioration in affordability in the March quarter, with a 16 per cent decline in just three months and a 33 per cent drop overall since last year's purple patch for buyers. The index is calculated by taking into account house prices, interest rates and factors such as the removal of the first home buyers boost.

Senior economist Ben Phillips said further interest rate rises in April and May would probably mean affordability would plummet further in the June quarter, to match the record lows seen in 2007 when interest rates were above 9 per cent.

''Housing affordability will once again be a key issue in the mortgage-belt regions of Australia,'' he said.

''We are yet to see the required level of co-operation between all levels of government to deliver critical housing infrastructure.''

Making things worse for first home buyers is that most of Australia's lenders show no signs of easing strict criteria that have made it difficult to get a sizeable loan.

As prices have gone up, so have loan-to-value ratios.

The loan-to-value ratio refers to the amount of money borrowed for a property compared to what the property is worth. For example, if a property is valued at $300,000 and a buyer borrows $270,000, the ratio is 90 per cent.

Adjustments to maximum ratios are one of the main devices financial institutions use to increase or decrease the amount they lend, alongside interest rates and fees.

In May, there were 31 less loans available of, or above, a 95 per cent loan-to-value ratio than in February, according to financial comparison website RateCity.

But it is not just in the mortgage belt that the high expense of housing is making life difficult. The ripples extend far and wide, even to those outside the market.

Victorian Housing Minister Richard Wynne last week was called before a public accounts and estimates committee to explain why the wait-list for public housing blew out to almost 40,000 people in March, having increased by 1013 in just three months.

There are now almost as many people waiting for government accommodation as there were in 1999, at the end of the Kennett government era.

Mr Wynne told the hearing that for the past few years the private rental market was the tightest the state had seen.

''And whilst the market has eased a little bit … there's a direct correlation between vacancies in the private rental market and the public housing waiting list,'' he said.

Mr Wynne said government interventions, including the expected delivery of 3800 new dwellings under federal social housing and economic stimulus money, and thousands more affordable rental properties thanks to the National Rental Affordability Scheme, would make a difference to supply.

Whether or not those goals are realised, conditions for those at the margins do not appear likely to improve any time soon.

However, it is not all bad news.

There are signs that Melbourne's property market may become a friendlier place for some buyers as winter approaches.

Auction clearance rates before Anzac Day were as high as 87 per cent, but have tapered off slightly since then. Last weekend it was 75 per cent, the lowest since the opening auction weekend of 2009 on March 21, according to the Real Estate Institute of Victoria.

Sales results have been the most patchy at the very top, a price segment that set the market on fire with a series of record-breaking results late last year.

Of course, there is no point mentioning clearance rates without taking into account the level of stock, and May is set to become the busiest auction month on record outside of the traditional spring selling season.

But even when the extra listings are taken into account, it seems clear that higher interest rates have finally tempered demand and will eventually slow price growth in other market sectors.

REIV communications manager Robert Larocca says the auction market at the moment has shades of autumn 2008, when vendors' confidence was still soaring from the 2007 price peak and listings were unseasonably high.

''Interest rates started to escalate and clearance rates dropped to the mid-60s,'' he says. ''This autumn, many of those same factors are in play but we haven't seen quite the same reaction. The market certainly has not crashed.''

Although affordability is yet to improve, it seems the market might finally be shifting back towards buyers, and sellers' reserves are not as likely to be exceeded as they were prior to Anzac Day.

In that context, a sign on the street offering $20,000 more than market value for houses appears even more out of place.

For the record, this columnist called the number on Friday, and was told that ''Sue'' would phone back. She hasn't yet.



Source: The Age

http://www.watoday.com.au/business/property/the-affordability-flaw-20100523-w41c.html

Rise in middle-class bankrupts in Australia

Rise in middle-class bankrupts
DANIELLA MILETIC
May 24, 2010
PROFESSIONALS and people on high incomes are declaring bankruptcy faster than ever in Australia, according to a study that reveals bankruptcies have risen by more than a third in the past four years.

The report contradicts the common belief that most people who file for bankruptcy are either chronically poor with no other options or the hugely wealthy avoiding debt obligations.

Bankruptcy is increasingly becoming a ''middle class phenomenon'' in Australia, says the report from the University of Melbourne Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation.

Professor Ian Ramsay, an author of the report, which will be published later this year, said the number of personal bankruptcy filings jumped by 6 per cent in 2008-09, after rising steadily over the past four years. There were 27,520 in 2008-09, an increase of 34 per cent since 2004-05, when there were 20,501 cases of bankruptcy. In 2009 the number of personal insolvency cases (which mainly involves bankruptcy but includes debt agreements) shot up to 36,487.

In an earlier study Professor Ramsay and his co-author, Cameron Sim, found that since 1990 there had been a 300 per cent increase in the number of personal insolvencies in Australia, far exceeding population growth and indicating a strong middle-class presence.

In their recent report Personal Insolvency in Australia, they have focused on middle class bankruptcy profiles. ''There are so many urban myths about bankrupts … students skipping on credit card bills, wealthy hiding assets who prefer to go into bankruptcy,'' Professor Ramsay said. ''They exist but are not indicative of the typical bankrupt.

''One of the biggest findings was that more and more of the middle class are being claimed by bankruptcy and, to us, it seems a social problem that has escaped notice.''

Because the phenomenon of the middle class bankrupt is so unheard of, Professor Ramsay said that Australians were largely unaware of the social costs to those affected, which includes 

  • tarnished credit ratings, 
  • difficulty in the workforce, 
  • cost to personal relationships and 
  • the still-prevalent stigma attached to becoming bankrupt.


He said insolvents are increasingly from higher-status occupations, have higher levels of personal and household income, and have rising asset and property ownership levels.

A major cause of rises in bankruptcy among the middle class, said Professor Ramsay, has been due to unsustainable home loans. Excessive use of credit as a cause of bankruptcy has jumped significantly in recent years, he added.



Source: The Sydney Morning Herald

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/rise-in-middleclass-bankrupts-20100523-w41p.html