Showing posts with label savings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label savings. Show all posts

Thursday 6 October 2011

Investment Calculator: How much am I going to get if I invest a certain amount?

The pressure to be money savvy is heavier than ever in the current economic climate, with the majority of Brits feeling the pinch. This Investment Calculator can help those keen to save some cash, either for a specific purchase or for a long term goal, understand either how long this will take, or at what growth rate they will need to receive to achieve a specific goal in a certain time frame. Another option for potential investors is to calculate the total amount they are likely to receive from an investment, to analyse its worth.




How much do I need to save to hit a target amount?

£ 
 Years
 %



What growth rate do I need to hit a target amount?

£ 
£ 
 Years



How much am I going to get if I invest a certain amount?

£ 
£ 
 Years
 %





Tuesday 9 August 2011

Saving for studies and taking the right financial decisions

Meghna Khanna has just got her first job after graduation. She plans to work for a few years before going back to school to get a management degree. She likes spending, but is equally keen to save for her studies. Though her parents live comfortably, they are not wealthy enough to fully fund her education. Allocating a large sum towards higher studies will compromise their other goals, but they will help her as much as they can. Meghna is tempted to leave home and fend for herself now that she is employed. She likes her financial independence, but wants to be sure that she does not take wrong decisions when it comes to money matters. What should she do?

Meghna's key goal is to fund her higher education, but she must first ascertain whether her saving would be adequate to cover the cost. She should clock a conservative rate of return by using a bank deposit rate on her investments in which she will deploy her savings. For the balance amount, she can seek a bank loan. She should choose a management school that has a good placement record, so she can hope to repay the loan without any difficulty. Since her parents are willing to support her routine needs, Meghna should use this to increase her monthly savings. She should not move out on an impulse as it would significantly increase her expenses and reduce her ability to save. For her parents, this arrangement would seem a much better proposition compared with funding a large sum towards her higher education.

Since Meghna knows that she will need an education loan in the future, she should work on building a good relationship with her bank. She should ensure that she builds her deposits in one bank account and also have a clean record. She should avoid taking a credit card at this point of time and also not take personal loans. If she does take a loan, she should repay it on time and have a good credit record. Since the money that is not saved invariably ends up being spent, Meghna should begin a systematic investment plan that debits her account towards the chosen investment.

Friday 17 December 2010

UK: Investors told forget savings accounts, think of shares

Investors told forget savings accounts, think of shares

Britain's 38 million savers have been urged to invest their money in the stock market after being warned that for many of them it is now a "waste of time" putting their cash into a savings account.


The FTSE 100 is yielding a better rate of return than most savings accounts Photo: AFP

By Harry Wallop, Consumer Affairs Editor, and Garry White 10:00PM GMT 14 Dec 2010

The warning came after official figures indicated that the cost of living had increased once again in November, making it nearly impossible to earn a real rate of return on any bank or building society savings product.

As the London stock market closed at a two-and-a-half-year high, experts said that for many savers taking the risk of abandoning a deposit account and placing it in a high-yielding collection of shares was a more sensible option.

The dearth of decent savings products was laid bare by figures from the personal finance website Moneyfacts which showed that there were just three accounts – out of a total of 2,203 on the market – that paid a real rate of return, and only one for higher-rate taxpayers.

Darius McDermott, the managing director of Chelsea Financial Services, an independent financial adviser, said: "The simple fact is if you have £1 and you invest in cash, you will lose out once you take into account tax and inflation. Most savings accounts are just a waste of time.

"But if you put that £1 into to a good high-yielding fund you will make a return. Of course your capital could increase or it could fall. That's the risk, but I would put my £1 into equities every single time."

RELATED ARTICLES



The Consumer Prices Index climbed from 3.2 per cent to 3.3 per cent, the Office for National Statistics said, while inflation, as measured by the Retail Prices Index jumped from 4.5 per cent in March to 4.7 per cent in November. The RPI is widely accepted as the truest measure of the cost of living because it includes housing costs.

A sharp jump in the price of clothing and food was blamed, taking economists by surprise, many of whom expected many retailers to cut prices in the run up to Christmas. There are fears inflation will carry on climbing next year because of the incresase in VAT from 17.5 per cent to 20 per cent and higher gas and electricity bills.

Just one account, an Independent Savings Account from Santander, can beat the RPI level of 4.7 per cent, offering a return of 5.5 per cent, but this is only for customers prepared to adhere to strict conditions.

Just two further bonds – a type of fixed-term savings product – offered by the Yorkshire Building Society and Barnsley Building Society offered a real rate of return for basic rate taxpayers, with a rate of 6 per cent.

Two months ago Which?, the consumer watchdog, calculated that the average saver in Britain is missing out on as much as £322 a year because of "pitiful interest" paid by the majority of accounts.

For any investor prepared to take a risk on their capital, the stock market looked a far better option, many experts said.

Mark Dampier, head of research at stockbroker Hargreaves Lansdowne, said: “You need to keep emergency money in the bank, but it’s self-evident that UK income funds are yielding more than bank accounts and these funds look good value at the moment. I am upbeat on prospects for the stock market.”
The yield on the FTSE 100 index of leading shares – the annual rate of return that investors can receive in the form of dividend payments – is 2.9 per cent, with many individual blue chips paying a far higher rate. For example, shares in oil giant Royal Dutch Shell are currently providing a yield of 5.1 per cent, with insurance giant Aviva yielding 6.2 per cent.

If the shares are held in an Individual Savings Account, the income is almost entirely tax-free.

Mr McDermott said: "Savers have to face the truth at the moment. If they have built up a pool of capital over their lifetime and they want to live off the income, putting it cash is the wrong decision."

Last night the FTSE 100 index closed up 30.36 at 5,891.21, the highest level for two and half years, as investors good economic data from America, raising hopes the world's largest economy might avoid a double-dip recession.

Many experts, however, warned that the rising levels of inflation would eat into consumers' disposable income making it far harder to put money aside as savings, be it a bank account or in shares.

The average family will be more than £300 worse off next year, even after receiving a pay rise, because of the impact of rising inflation, a surge in energy bills and a jump in VAT, according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), a think tank.

However, even allowing for a 2.4 per cent pay rise, they will have only £176 to spare each week from January 2011 due to the rising cost of living, the CEBR says, down from £182 at the start of this year. The difference equates to shortfall of £312 a year.

This means that over the course of the year families will be £312 a year worse off, even though the recession has ended and experts forecast the economy to grow steadily.

Official data from the Bank of England has already indicated that savers are putting less money aside each month. The so-called savings ratio – a measure of what proportion of a family's monthly income they save – has fallen from 7.7 per cent a year ago to just 3.2 per cent.

Victoria Mayo, spokesperson for Moneyfacts, said: "Inflation continues to antagonise prudent savers who are already struggling to achieve a competitive return on their money.

"Those who rely on their savings to supplement their income have been hardest hit, many of whom are pensioners."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/8202251/Investors-told-forget-savings-accounts-think-of-shares.html

Is it time to take a chance on shares?

Is it time to take a chance on shares?

With the banks offering pitifully low interest rates, more investors are switching their attention to the stock market, says Ian Cowie.

F&C dropped out of the FTSE 250 earlier this year Photo: AFP

By Ian Cowie 8:27PM GMT 15 Dec 2010

Most people regard inflation as a bad thing, and many may be puzzled about why the stock market is hitting new highs at the same time that inflation is accelerating. The explanation is that while inflation robs savers in bank and building society deposits by reducing the real value or purchasing power of the money they set aside, investors in shares can point to more than a century of evidence that this way of storing wealth can cope with rising inflation by increasing dividends and capital growth.

Savers have good reason to resent being punished for their thrift. Some may feel even worse when they realise that the Government is one of the beneficiaries of inflation, because it not only reduces the real value of savings but also of debts – and the Government is the biggest debtor in Britain.

With a massive deficit in public finances, gradually debauching the currency appears to offer a relatively painless way to float off the rocks of debt. Pensioners are less likely to protest about the stealthy erosion of their savings than younger people are to riot about reduced state handouts or higher interest rates. The problem is that trying to have a little bit of inflation is like trying to get a little bit pregnant; things soon get out of hand.

For example, just over a year ago – in October 2009 – the Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation was actually negative. The annual rate of change was minus 0.8 per cent and had been minus 1.4 per cent the month before. By contrast, the RPI is now rising at 4.7 per cent.

If that sounds like small beer compared with inflation seen in the 1970s, then beware: even today's rate of erosion would be enough to halve the purchasing power of money in little more than 15 years. That's much less than the 22 years and six months the average man can now expect to spend in retirement, according to the Office for National Statistics. Or the 24 years and eight months that awaits the average woman at retirement. So there is nothing theoretical about the problem inflation presents to pensioners.


RELATED ARTICLES


Worse still, the Government plans to reduce the indexation – or statutory protection against inflation – that pensioners receive in future. From next April, all public sector pensions will be uprated in line with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI). This produces a lower measure of inflation by excluding mortgage costs and council tax and is currently rising at 3.3 per cent. From April 2012, the Basic State Pension will also switch to CPI.

Cynics argue that rising inflation should come as no surprise, since the Government's main tool for fighting the global credit crunch has been quantitative easing – akin to printing more money. The signs were also there when the Bank of England switched most of its staff pension fund into index-linked or inflation-proofed government gilt-edged stock, as reported by the Telegraph in April last year. And when National Savings & Investments abruptly ceased selling index-linked certificates in July, that removed the only risk-free way for individuals to protect their savings from inflation. Talk about taking the umbrella away, just as it started to rain.

Fortunately, history offers some comfort for those willing to accept varying degrees of risk in order to preserve the purchasing power of their money. According to Barclays Capital, shares reflecting the broad composition of the London Stock Exchange have provided greater real returns than deposits over three quarters of the periods of five consecutive years since 1899. Shares also beat fixed-interest bonds in 75 per cent of all those five-year periods during a century which, remember, included the Great Depression and two World Wars.

While the past is not a guide to the future, the historical evidence shows that the probability of shares doing better than bonds and deposits increased over longer periods. For example, over all the 10-year periods, shares delivered higher returns than deposits 92 per cent of the time, and beat bonds 80 per cent of the time. But shorter term stock market speculators took bigger risks – for example, deposits did better than shares in a third of the periods of two consecutive years.

Against all that, perennial pessimism remains the easiest way to simulate wisdom about stock markets. That's why many experts have been calling the top of this market all the way up. Despite having missed the start of this bull run, they argue that shares are now too high – even though they do not look expensive on some tried-and-tested means of assessing value. The average price of the shares that constitute the FTSE 100 index is now 12 times their average earnings per share. By contrast, the same price/earnings ratio exceeded 31 by the time the FTSE hit its all-time peak of 6,930 in December 1999.

More importantly for income-seeking savers, the average yield – or the dividends paid by shares expressed as a percentage of their price – is now slightly above 3 per cent. But, when prices soared to unsustainable levels a decade ago, the yield on the FTSE 100 slumped to less than 2 per cent.

It's worth stressing that the yield on shares is quoted net of basic rate tax, so 3 per cent net is even more attractive than it may at first appear by comparison with bank deposits, which are quoted before tax. The FTSE 100 yield is also six times Bank of England base rate and, while returns on deposits remain frozen and inflation continues to rise, there is every chance that the FTSE 100 could hit 6,000 soon.

If that sounds far-fetched, here's what I wrote in The Daily Telegraph in August 2009, while the index still languished below 5,000: "After all the worldly-wise men's warnings of a double-dip recession, it should be no surprise to see the FTSE 100 soar. If anything, the continued consensus among most market observers that this remarkable rally has 'gone too far, too fast' should boost our hopes the index will breach 5,000 soon.
"The reason is that economies tend to grow over time and shareholders own the companies that create this wealth. So, medium to long-term savers – like those of us saving toward paying off the mortgage or funding retirement – need not worry too much if share prices fall next month. That might be a problem for fund managers, who must answer to a board of directors every few weeks, and an opportunity for the rest of us.

"Finally, it is worth considering the personal anxiety of many professionals who are now 'short of the market' or holding cash rather than shares. They can only afford to sit and watch prices rise for so long before they feel compelled to join the fun and keep their jobs."

Shares and share-based funds are not as cheap as they were in August last year. But, as more people have come to feel that the credit crunch is not the end of the world after all, the penny has dropped and inflows of capital from bank deposits into the stock market have pushed prices up.

That raises the risk that buyers today could lose money if prices fall. This is a real danger with shares, which means nobody should invest cash they cannot afford to lose in the stock market – and, as mentioned earlier, the shorter your time horizon, the bigger the risks.

Two ways to diminish these risks are to commit funds for five years or more and to diversify.

By contrast, frozen interest rates and rising inflation mean most supposedly risk-free bank and building society deposits are now a certain way to lose money slowly.

There is little point saving if returns fail to match the rate at which inflation erodes the purchasing power of money. So, while shares and share-based funds offer no capital guarantee, rising numbers of people who must live off their savings or use them to supplement pensions should consider some long-term exposure to shares and share-based funds.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/comment/iancowie/8204914/Is-it-time-to-take-a-chance-on-shares.html

Friday 25 June 2010

UK families saving more money than borrowing for first time in 20 years

Families are banking more money than they are borrowing for the first time in more than 20 years, a Bank of England report shows.

Coins and notes - Rate alert: the best savings accounts
Charities said it was unsurprising that, at a time of high unemployment, households were being more prudent with their budgets Photo: GETTY
Households last year put £24 billion into deposit accounts and took out £20 billion in new loans. It is the first time since 1988, when the current records began, that savings exceeded new borrowing.
The statistics relating to families reflect a culture of austerity that has also dominated public finance policy. The Chancellor unveiled the biggest cuts to public spending for almost a century in this week’s Budget. Combined with £29 billion in annual tax rises, the Government’s own figures suggest that individuals earning £50,000 will be £1,600 worse off within two years, while the average citizen will be £400 worse off.
Leading economists said the recent recession – the worst for 60 years – meant households had become increasingly concerned about paying their debts.
Benjamin Williamson, a senior economist at CEBR, the consultancy, said: “Higher unemployment and increased risk aversion mean we will have higher savings as households rebalance their finances.”
Peter Spencer, the chief economic adviser to the Ernst & Young ITEM Club, said: “People are reducing their borrowings. It’s the combined effect of some families not being able to get credit and other families choosing to pay their debts off.”
Overall savings, including pensions and investments, rose last year from 2 per cent of household income to 7 per cent as families prepared for leaner times, according to the Office for National Statistics. This year, the savings ratio has risen further, to 8 per cent, a level not achieved since 1998.
At the same time borrowing has fallen dramatically.
With cheap credit readily available, borrowing hit an all-time high of £125 billion in 2004. The debt binge was driven by rising house prices as families remortgaged to release equity for holidays and other luxuries. At its peak, in 2007, net mortgage lending hit £108 billion.
Last year, by contrast, households borrowed just £20 billion, the lowest level since 1993.
David Hollingworth, of mortgage brokers London & Country, said: “There’s been a complete turnaround in the approach of borrowers. Rather than using mortgages as a cheap way of borrowing – effectively using their home as a piggy bank to fund their luxury purchases – they are now looking to pay down debt more quickly. They are tightening their belts amid concerns about higher interest rates in the future and questions over the employment market.”
The shift from loans to deposits has occurred despite the relatively low rates on offer in traditional savings accounts, which are now offering up to 3 per cent compared with 5 per cent before the crisis.
However, the Bank of England pointed out that savers were getting a good deal compared with the Bank Rate, which remains at a historic low of 0.5 per cent.
Charities said it was unsurprising that, at a time of high unemployment, households were being more prudent with their budgets.
But they warned that families still faced tough times ahead with the prospect of rising interest rates. Delroy Corinaldi, a director at the charity Consumer Credit Counselling Service, said: “Unemployment and pressures on the public purse will ensure the problem of over-indebtedness continues. The crux of the problem will not be about levels of debt but ability to repay, particularly if and when interest rates go up.”
Household finances are likely to be squeezed further because of George Osborne’s Emergency Budget. VAT will rise from 17.5 per cent to 20 per cent, while up to 700,000 more workers are to pay higher rate income tax after the threshold was lowered.
In April, ONS figures showed the average person’s wealth fell by £16,000 in the first part of the recession, a drop of 15 per cent.

Saturday 23 January 2010

Short-term investments: Savings Accounts, Money-Market Funds, Treasury Bills and Certificate of Deposits

The Pros and Cons of some Basic Investments

Savings Accounts, Money-Market Funds, Treasury Bills and Certificate of Deposits

All of the above are known as short-term investments.

They pay you interest.  You get your money back in a relatively short time.

In savings accounts, Treasury bills, and CDs, your money is insured against losses, so you're guaranteed to get it back.

Money markets lack the guarantee, bu the chances of losing money in a money market are remote.

One big disadvantage:  They pay you a low rate of interest.

Sometimes, the interest rate you get in a money-market account or a savings account can't even keep up with inflationLooking at it that way, a savings account may be a losing proposition.

Inflation is a fancy way of saying that prices of things are going up.  Another way to look at inflation is that the buying power of the dollar is going down.

The first goal of saving and investing is to keep ahead of inflation.  Your money's on a threadmill that's constantly going backward.  In recent years, you had to make 3 % on your investments just to stay even.

That's the problem with leaving money in a bank or a savings and loan.  The money is safe in the short run, because it's insured against loss, but in the long run, it is likely to lose ground against taxes and inflation. 

Here's a tip - when the inflation rate is higher than the interest rate you're getting from a CD, Treasury bill, money-market account, or savings account, you're investing in a lost cause.

  • Savings accounts are great places to park money so you can get at it quickly, whenever you need to pay bills. 
  • They are great places to store cash until you've got a big enough pile to invest elsewhere. 
  • But over long periods of time, they won't do you much good.

Invest Now! What are you waiting for?

Many people wait until they are in their thirties, fourties, and fifties to start saving money.

The trouble is, by the time they realize they ought to be investing, they've lost valuable years when stocks could have been working in their favour.

One of the best way to avoid this fate is to begin saving money as early as possible, while you're living at home.  When else are your expenses going to be this low?  You have no children to feed - your parents are probably feeding you.

Money is a great friend, once you send it off to work.  It puts extra cash in your pocket without your having to lift a finger.

If you invest $500 a year in stocks instead of putting it in the bank, the money gets a chance to do you an even bigger favour, while you're off someplace living your life.  On average, you will double your money every 7 or 8 years if you leave it in stocks. 

A lot of smart investors have learned to take advantage of this.  They realise that capital (money) is as important to their future as their own jobs (labour).

Warren Buffett, America's second richest man, got there by saving money and later putting it into stocks.  To him, a $400 TV set he saw in the store wasn't really a $400 purchase.  He always thought about how much that $400 would be worth twenty years later, if he invested it instead of spending it.  This sort of thinking kept him from wasting his money on items he didn't need.

If you start saving and investing early enough, you'll get to the point where your money is supporting you.  This is what most people hope for, a chance to have financial independence where they're free to go places and do what they want, while their money stays home and goes to work.  But it will never happen unless you get in the habit of saving and investing and putting aside a certain amount every month, at a young age.

In the past people felt great pride when they worked hard and made certain sacrifices in order to pay for something all at once.  It made them nervous to owe money to the banks, and when they paid off their home mortgages, they had parties and invited all the neighbours to help them celebrate.

It wasn't until the 1960s that Americans got into the habit of using credit cards, and it wasn't until the 1980s that average families were hocked to the limit on mortgages, car loans, home equity loans, and the unpaid balances on their cards.

It is OK to pay interest on a house or an apartment, which will increase in value, but not on cars, appliances, clothes, or TV sets, which are worth less and less as you use them.

Debt is saving  in reverse.  The more it builds up, the worse off you are.  We see this in households across America, people struggling to make the payments, and in the government itself, which at the moment is hopelessly in debt.

America was once a nation of savers.

People of all income levels put aside as much money as they could, mostly in savings accounts at the local bank.  They made money on this money as it grew with interest, so eventually they could use it for a down payment on a house, or  to buy things, or to draw on in family emergencies.  In the meantime, the bank could take people's savings and lend them out to home buyers, or home builders, or businesses of all kinds.

Save as much as you can!  YOU'll be helping yourself and helping the country.

Friday 27 November 2009

CDs, Savings and Money Market Accounts

The big attraction of the choices in this group is their safety of principal.  In fact, they are considered so safe that they are generally lumped together as an asset class called "Cash/Cash Equivalents."  For the purpose of this article, let's call them all "cash".

The main attraction of cash is simple - the value of the principal does not fluctuate and may even be guaranteed depending on the amount of the investment.  Put a dollar in, and you'll get a dollar back, plus interest.  In addition, the assets in cash group can generally be "cashed in" at full value on short notice (although CDs may have meaningful early surrender penalties).  No matter what gyrations the stock market or interest rates are going through , the value of these assets stays the same.  Most financial planners will recommend that you have enough money salted away in cash/cash equivalents to cover three to six months' living expenses, plus an amount to cover any known major outlays you'll have to make in the next year or two.  This group of assets can also add stability to your portfolio because their value is stable.  All in all, cash plays a key role in building a portfolio as a sound foundation for funding emergencies or contingent expenses - but not for income!

Sunday 12 July 2009

The more important issue is saving, then investing.


While there is a great deal of hype and interest in investing, the more important issue is saving. Without systematic and increasing savings, investing programs will get you nowhere. Spending less than you are making is the key tactic.

Sunday 29 March 2009

Savings mean the road to financial freedom


2009/01/10

YourMoney: Savings mean the road to financial freedom
By : Yap Ming Hui


THE discipline of being able to save consistently and on target would make or break our financial freedom journey. There are three main reasons why is saving important.

- The more we save, the more we accumulate

The first reason is simple and obvious. The more we save, the more we can accumulate. Obviously, we would have more resources to invest to grow our assets.

- The more we save, the less we spend

When we force ourselves to save more, we would definitely have less to spend. As such, we are able to control the standard of living and live below the mean.

Throughout my practice, I have come across clients who are able to accumulate substantial amount of assets through prudent spending and disciplined saving.

When we do not have too high a standard of living, it makes our job of maintaining a living standard during our retirement easier to attain.

On one hand, I have seen people who do not make much but save a lot. On the other hand, I have also met people who earn high income but save very little.

Many years ago, when I had just started my profession, I met Eugene, a chief executive officer of an American multi-national corporation, who earned more than RM50,000 a month.

At that time, he was the highest income-earner person I had ever met.

In my heart, I was overjoyed as I believed that I would have a big case on which to do financial and investment planning.

However, after the fact-finding process, I discovered that Eugene had assets worth only about RM2 million.

And about RM1 million of this asset was his forced savings in the Employees' Provident Fund.

The balance was the worth of the house he was staying in.

I was very surprised to find out that he had so little assets despite his high income.

So, I asked him: "Eugene, how much do you save every month?"

Eugene said: "Well, I did want to save every month. However, at the end of the month, there is always not much left."

So, if you just want to wait till you have more income to save more, you might as well forget it.

It is never about how much you make. It is always about how much you save.

- How best can we solve this problem?

Yes, you are right. Before you start spending and paying bills every month, pay yourself first.

Determine how much is the right amount of saving for you and save that amount first. It is even better if you can have a regular and automatic saving scheme.

- The more we save, the less rate of investment return we need

In fact, the more we save, the less risk we need to take in financial freedom planning.

Let's take an example of RM5,000,000 accumulation goal.

Let's assume that you are 45 years old, and planning to retire at 60.

If you can save RM50,000 per annum, you need to achieve 23.9 per cent of rate of interest (ROI) for RM5,000,000 goal.

If you can save RM120,000 per annum,you need to achieve 13.4 per cent of ROI.

If you can save RM180,000 per annum, you need to achieve only 8.3 per cent of ROI.

Of course, RM5,000,000 is only the example.

The lesson to be learnt is that the more we save, the less ROI is required to achieve the same accumulation goal.

When we do not need to achieve a high ROI, we do not need to stomach too much risk and volatility.

The less risks we take, the more peaceful life will be.

- How much to save?

I believe most of us understand the importance of saving. In fact, almost every time I was interviewed by the media, I would always be asked, "How much of their income should Malaysians save?"

To some financial planner, it is not a very difficult question for them to answer. Some would say 20 per cent. Some would say 30 per cent. Some would even say 40 per cent.

However, this is quite a tough and tricky question for me to answer.

Based on my experience of developing many tailor-made financial plans for clients, I know that the right saving rate varies from one person to another.

For example, if you have a monthly income of RM3,000, the right savings rate for you may be 20 per cent.

This is because you need to spend majority of your income to sustain your standard of living.

However, if you have a monthly income of RM50,000, the right savings rate for you may be 50 per cent.

This is because you don't need to spend the majority of your income to sustain your standard of living.

Of course, this is just one of many examples, but it shows that there is no standard "right saving" rate for every one.

Therefore, each of us should have a tailor-made financial plan to determine the right savings rate for us.

Only then, would we know that we are saving enough to meet our future commitments.

- What if your saving is under target?

If the savings and contributions are less than target planned, you may fail to achieve your financial freedom.

If the gap continues, chances are that you may not be able to achieve your original financial goals set.

In the situation whereby the actual saving is less than planned, we must review our cash flow statement to identify the discrepancy and take necessary recovery measures.

If we have confirmed that the planned saving target is unrealistic, it is important that we readjust some of our financial goals and asset allocation strategies.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yap Ming Hui is the managing director of Whitman Independent Advisors Sdn Bhd, the first multi-client family office in Malaysia

Danger of excessive spending

BUSINESS/YAP MING HUI: Danger of excessive spending
By Yap Ming Hui

2008/03/16

THE founder of one of the largest investment fund in the world, Sir John M. Templeton, once said: “Those who are thrifty will grow wealthy, and those who are spendthrifts will become poor. During my first 15 years after college, I made a game of adhering to a budget that included saving 50 cents out of every earnings.” In fact, the discipline of being able to control our spending and save consistently would make or break our wealth maximisation success.


Case study


Many years ago, I met Joshua in a business seminar. He was then the managing director of a multinational corporation. He was in his late 40s. Over a conversation, he shared with me that he was earning RM600,000 per year. I must admit that I was impressed. I was still new to the industry then.


RM600,000 annual income was really big.


I expected him to have accumulated a substantial amount of wealth over the years. However, when I added up all his assets, I found that his total asset was less than RM2 million. His net worth was less than RM1 million. More than 70 per cent of his net worth was from his EPF saving.


Iwas really shocked.I asked him where all his income has gone to.


He told me that he didn’t know.


Every month, his family and he spent the income to maintain their life style. At the end of the month, there was nothing much left to accumulate and invest. Every time there was an income increment, he just increased his spending accordingly. This is a classic example of excessive spending.


The problem Joshua is definitely the classic victim of Parkinson’s Law. The law states that your expenditures rise to meet your income.


Remember the time when we started working, we earned about RM1,500 per month. Then, we barely had enough money to sustain our monthly expenses.


However, we were not worried.


We knew that when our income increased later, we would have some saving. After a few years, our income rose to RM3,000 per month. Did you really end up having a lot of saving? The answer, of course, is no. You discovered that your expenditures actually went up to meet your income. As a result, you didn’t have much to save. To most people, the same thing happens when their income increases to RM5,000, RM10,000 or RM15,000. In the case of my friend, Joshua, his expenditures rose to meet his income of RM50,000 per month.


When you suffer from excessive spending disease, it will cause the following problems to your wealth maximisation:


•The more we spend, the less we save
The first problem is simple and obvious. The more we spend, the less we can save. As a result, we would have less resource to invest.


•The more we spend, the more we need to sustain during retirement
When you spend the majority of your income to maintain your current life style, you create a huge challenge to maintain your life style in the event that your active income stops.


We can see the picture better by using Joshua as an example. He spent almost all of his income almost every month to maintain his RM30,000 life style. Should he retire, he would have to maintain a retirement life style of RM30,000 per month without his active income.


This would present a very huge challenge. However, if he were to control his living expenses to RM20,000 per month, not only would he have extra RM10,000 to save, also he would need only maintain a life style of RM20,000 per month during his retirement.


•The more we spend, the higher rate of investment return we need The more we spend and the less we save, the more risk we will need to take in wealth accumulation planning.


Lets take an example of RM5 million accumulation goal in Table 1. Assume that your are 45 and plan to retire at 60. If you can save RM180,000 per annum, you need to achieve only 8.3 per cent of return on investment (ROI). If you can save less at RM120,000 per annum, you need to achieve a higher ROI at 13.4 per cent. If you can only save RM50,000 per annum, you need to achieve 23.9 per cent of ROI for RM5 million goal.


Therefore, the lesser you save, the higher ROI is required to achieve your accumulation target.


As a result, you will need to take higher investment risk to achieve the same goal. When we do not need to achieve a high ROI, we do not need to take too much risk and volatility. The less risk we take, the more peaceful our life will be.


Alternative solutions


•Acknowledge the danger of Parkinson ’s Law
To avoid the problem of excessive spending, you must be aware of the impact of Parkinson’s Law. You need to know that saving would not come naturally unless you make it an effort to control your spending. Unless you acknowledge the danger of Parkinson ’s Law, it is very difficult for you to tackle excessive spending

•Spend after you save
The most effective practice to avoid excessive spending is to spend after you have provided for saving (Income –Savings = Expenses. NOT Income –Expenses = Savings). By forcing yourself to save more, you would definitely have less to spend. As a result, you are able to control your living expenses and live within your means.


• Conduct a life-long cash-flow plan
In order for you to know your optimum life style (living expenses) and savings required to support that life style without active income, it is important that you conduct a life-long cash-flow plan.


This cash-flow plan will project your annual income and expenses until the last day of your life.


By doing this exercise, you can find out what living standards yo u can afford and determine the savings needed during your active income years.


As a result, you can appreciate how challenging it is to sustain high living expenses without active income.


Hopefully, you can also recognise the urgency and importance to start saving now.


Yap Ming Hui is the managing director of Whitman Independent Advisors Sdn Bhd, the first multi-family office in Malaysia


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© Copyright 2009 The New Straits Times Press (M) Berhad. All rights reserved.

http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Sunday/Columns/20080316084555/Article/pppull_index_html